- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fumble play vs Kellen Mond play (picture comparison)
Posted on 11/6/22 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 11/6/22 at 3:55 pm
Kellen Mond fumble ruled down
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-dmn.s3.amazonaws.com/public/BP6ZMINDDFKUP2D6OHDNFT4EUA.jpg)
Vs
Mond only had one hand on the ball. Brooks had two.
And they had enough evidence to reverse the Mond play. How was there not enough evidence to uphold the Brooks play?
Completely inconsistent.
Vs
Mond only had one hand on the ball. Brooks had two.
And they had enough evidence to reverse the Mond play. How was there not enough evidence to uphold the Brooks play?
Completely inconsistent.
15
Posted on 11/6/22 at 3:57 pm to WaWaWeeWa
If a player touches the ball while out of bounds, isn't that a penalty?
Posted on 11/6/22 at 3:57 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Guys, You are embarrassing yourselves. He did not have possession, because he didn’t control it long enough to have possession; Mond did. If Mond had bobbled it as he stood up, he would not have been ruled down. It’s like y’all never watched football before.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 3:59 pm to WaWaWeeWa
1 hand on the ball = possession
2 hands on the ball playing against Bama = no possession
2 hands on the ball playing against Bama = no possession
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:01 pm to Penrod
quote:
Guys, You are embarrassing yourselves. He did not have possession, because he didn’t control it long enough to have possession; Mond did. If Mond had bobbled it as he stood up, he would not have been ruled down. It’s like y’all never watched football before.
So Mond only had possession based on what he did after his knee was down and therefore retroactively had possession when his knee was down?
And you think we are stupid?
Fumble rules are different than catch rules. You need to stop embarrassing yourself.
This post was edited on 11/6/22 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:01 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Thanks for posting the brooks pic. Was at the game but couldn’t see what happened and was scratching my head all day with what people were talking about
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:01 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Mond only had one hand on the ball. Brooks had two.
Quantity of hands touching a ball doesn't constitute possession. The ball was rolling around thru the LSU players hand and under his body. The ball never moved around in Monds 1 hand.
IN MY OPINION
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:02 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Brooks was not down, his knees are not on the ground, Mond had knees on the ground.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:02 pm to Penrod
quote:
Penrod
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:02 pm to Geaux Tahel
quote:
Quantity of hands touching a ball doesn't constitute possession. The ball was rolling around thru the LSU players hand and under his body. The ball never moved around in Monds 1 hand.
Yea. After the Bama guy hit it.
Which was after brooks had already established possession with his knee on the ground.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:03 pm to Penrod
quote:
he didn’t control it long enough to have possession;
How long do you have to possess the ball to possess it?
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:03 pm to FreddieMac
quote:
Brooks was not down, his knees are not on the ground, Mond had knees on the ground.
There is another picture with his knee on the ground I just couldn’t find it.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:05 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:Not sure but I think it's longer than the .1 second the LSu player was touching it.
How long do you have to possess the ball to possess it?
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:06 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Need a gif of the play from last night.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:08 pm to Chrome
quote:
If a player touches the ball while out of bounds, isn't that a penalty?
If a wide receiver goes out of bounds (on his own) and is the first to touch the ball it is a penalty.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:10 pm to WaWaWeeWa
The issue for me is, this should have been a ‘play stands as called’ decision. Because that’s exactly what it WOULD have been if the fumble was by LSU and the recovery by the red team.
My opinion - you are free to just let me have it and I’ll continue to brood about it.
My opinion - you are free to just let me have it and I’ll continue to brood about it.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:10 pm to Penrod
How long is long enough. Is it normally timed with a stop watch? Such a stupid comment.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:11 pm to JOJO Hammer
quote:
If a wide receiver goes out of bounds (on his own) and is the first to touch the ball it is a penalty.
He is allowed to reestablish himself inbounds. Think Moss in 2019
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:11 pm to Penrod
quote:
Penrod
Just an absolute fricking moron on every board around TD.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 4:15 pm to Geaux Tahel
From NCAA rule book for definition of possession.
No mention of the amount of time.
They might want to rethink the rule. A player can’t be out of bounds and make a catch without getting completely back on the field but they can impact a loose ball? Weird.
quote:
The ball is in player possession when a player has the ball firmly in their grasp by holding or controlling it with hand(s) or arm(s) while contacting the ground inbounds.
No mention of the amount of time.
They might want to rethink the rule. A player can’t be out of bounds and make a catch without getting completely back on the field but they can impact a loose ball? Weird.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News