- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Flynn or Mauck
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:33 am to LA007
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:33 am to LA007
quote:
Later, they quoted me as saying that I thought Mauck would be a better pro player than Eli.
FAIL!!!! That's what you get talking to Ole Miss fans. Mauck threw a pick 6 on the first play of the game and they thought he was better?
What did Eli have to work with at Ole Miss? We had how many first and second round players? Ole Miss talent wise should not have been close to us but nearly won.
0
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:39 am to ShermanTxTiger
quote:
Besides the Pass to Green against UGA (After Mauck fumbled 2 minutes earlier) give me a Mauck moment to support your theory?
The fact that Mauck had a much better passer efficiency rating and a much higher completion percentage than Flynn.
The better QB is the one that was more consistent over the whole season. (Mauck with the much higher passer rating and completion percentage)
Mauck didn't have many huge plays, but he was the better QB.
This post was edited on 4/24/09 at 1:43 am
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:42 am to The Boat
quote:
The fact that Mauck had a much better passer efficiency rating and a much higher completion percentage than Flynn
If that is what you want to use I guess your mind is made up. He did all those things and set the TD pass record too I believe.
In the big games, give me Flynn. I want his stats in those games.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:49 am to ShermanTxTiger
quote:
In the big games, give me Flynn. I want his stats in those games.
Ok, I consider Virginia Tech, South Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Auburn, Alabama, and Ohio State our big games from 2007. (That Flynn started)
He played great against an over-matched Ohio State team and pretty well against Virginia Tech and Auburn. But every other big game he played fair to poorly in.
Other than the BCSNGC, which is a big game of course, but other than that game, I don't see where you're getting this notion that Flynn was amazing in big games.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:54 am to The Boat
I want which ever is "whiter" cause he is obviously smarter and a winner. Would make less mistakes also.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:06 am to tduecen
One could argue that Mauck was more valuable because had he gone down LSU had no real back up.
When Flynn went down he had RP to step in and win us a game.
Had Mauck gone down we were screwed, we basically saw a similar team the following year that struggled with Randall as QB.
When Flynn went down he had RP to step in and win us a game.
Had Mauck gone down we were screwed, we basically saw a similar team the following year that struggled with Randall as QB.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:10 am to tduecen
Flynn.
Mad
to them both, though.
Mad
to them both, though.Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:13 am to The Boat
quote:
2003 Oklahoma's defense>>>>>>>>>2007 Ohio State's defense. Not even close.
Wrong.
Ohio State's 2007 Defense was better than OU's 2003 Defense. You're right though..it's not really close.
NCAA:
Ohio State 2007 Defense: Allowed 3.64 yards per play & 233.00 per game
(Defense completed season ranked #1)
Oklahoma 2003 Defense: Allowed 4.13 per play & 259.64 per game
(Defense completed season ranked #3)
Championship Games:
Flynn 2007: 19 of 27 - 4 TDs 1 INT, 174 yards
Mauck 2003: 13 of 22 - 0 TDs, 2 Ints, 124 yards
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:17 am to Sammich
Yeah, because Ohio State really went against those high powered Big 10 offenses that season.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:18 am to Sammich
Now lets compare the teams in conference and see who actually played someone worth a damn
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:20 am to Sammich
In a tied game situation....with a TD pass needed, I want Flynn in the game...That kid is clutch, many great, tough situation passes...Mauck was a great QB also...Flynn and Mauck were two of the best Qbs in LSU history...they both have rings....
Posted on 4/24/09 at 2:21 am to lesticles101
quote:
In a tied game situation....with a TD pass needed, I want Flynn in the game...That kid is clutch, many great, tough situation passes...Mauck was a great QB also...Flynn and Mauck were two of the best Qbs in LSU history...they both have rings....
so much wrong with this statement especially
quote:
Flynn and Mauck were two of the best Qbs in LSU history...they both have rings.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:07 am to Sammich
quote:
Mauck 2003: 13 of 22 - 0 TDs, 2 Ints, 124 yards
these have to be wrong.
mauck was smarter than that!
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:09 am to lesticles101
quote:
Flynn and Mauck were two of the best Qbs in LSU history...they both have rings....
they were both decent QB's, and have rings, but were not the two best in LSU history.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:09 am to The Boat
Your a racist.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:23 am to lesticles101
quote:This I disagree with. But, they both had great character and leadership and that certain "something", that was able to spark their teams. Honestly, I'd take both of em..
Flynn and Mauck were two of the best Qbs in LSU history....
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:54 am to Ole Geauxt
quote:
But, they both had great character and leadership and that certain "something", that was able to spark their teams.
+1
Posted on 4/24/09 at 7:08 am to tduecen
Flynn
The defense let us down in our loses the championship year.
The defense let us down in our loses the championship year.
Posted on 4/24/09 at 7:15 am to tduecen
tough call.
but I'd have to give a very slight edge to Flynn because he seemed to through a prettier pass than Mauck, imho.
but I'd have to give a very slight edge to Flynn because he seemed to through a prettier pass than Mauck, imho.
This post was edited on 4/24/09 at 7:21 am
Posted on 4/24/09 at 7:22 am to Ole Geauxt
quote:
Flynn and Mauck were two of the best Qbs in LSU history....
Depends on one's perspective of "the best QB's in LSU history." Are we talking top 10 starting QB's, any QB to ever play, etc. Just on the top 10 starting QB's point, I think fans would have a hard time keeping both Mauck and Flynn out of the top 10 simply because they have rings. I see them being ranked between 6-10 but I would definitely have a hard time keeping them out of the top 10. So, to say both are two of the best to ever play at LSU is not so far fetched.
This post was edited on 4/24/09 at 7:25 am
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News