- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/5/25 at 6:44 pm to tiger91
quote:
Funyun lady said that he stopped in the middle of the road
So the woman who was at fault is trying to say that it really wasn't her fault?
Posted on 10/5/25 at 7:10 pm to Adajax
But that’s what she said .. that he braked and then he braked harder and then he stopped in the road. I didn’t see that on the video (that he stopped) and the rest wasn’t able to be seen on video. Again I wish there was another camera angle.
Posted on 10/5/25 at 7:11 pm to tiger91
I will say that she said she saw the green charger … in my mind I can’t see they she saw it if she was behind the truck. Again idk though. Some have said that she lied and that should be a charge against her.
Edit to add — I haven’t been in any awful incidents so I don’t know what my reaction would be but I hope I’d be truthful and clear about it all!
Edit to add — I haven’t been in any awful incidents so I don’t know what my reaction would be but I hope I’d be truthful and clear about it all!
This post was edited on 10/5/25 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:16 pm to Adajax
Agreed.
Point is KL was driving stupidly and illegally into oncoming traffic then moved back into his lane less than 1.5 seconds before impact. The truck slowed & moved to side of road to evade him. The car was was tailgating and moved to left to avoid hitting truck doing evasive maneuver.
A person is dead due to her poor driving. A person is dead because a young man was driving stupidly and illegally causing oncoming traffic to take evasive actions.
Point is KL was driving stupidly and illegally into oncoming traffic then moved back into his lane less than 1.5 seconds before impact. The truck slowed & moved to side of road to evade him. The car was was tailgating and moved to left to avoid hitting truck doing evasive maneuver.
A person is dead due to her poor driving. A person is dead because a young man was driving stupidly and illegally causing oncoming traffic to take evasive actions.
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:18 pm to tiger91
She was tailgating him at 50 mph while he was going 25 mph?
Lawyer didn't provide speed truck prior to accident. It would have hurt his narrative to demonstrate he slowed down to avoid the green charger.
Lawyer didn't provide speed truck prior to accident. It would have hurt his narrative to demonstrate he slowed down to avoid the green charger.
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:34 pm to LSU7096
Even if HE slowed down, SHE did not. And she said she saw him hit his brakes .. and then hit them harder .. and then he “just stopped” in the road. That’s what is typed out.
SO if she saw him slow down, and then brake harder and then stop, that took more than a few seconds and she did t hit her brakes per the report until .5 seconds before she hit them.
Maybe he was going 28 the whole time and being an old fart.
We don’t know.
SO if she saw him slow down, and then brake harder and then stop, that took more than a few seconds and she did t hit her brakes per the report until .5 seconds before she hit them.
Maybe he was going 28 the whole time and being an old fart.
We don’t know.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 2:54 pm to tiger91
quote:
But that’s what she said .. that he braked and then he braked harder and then he stopped in the road.
Please correct me if I have this wrong, but if she saw him brake, then brake harder, then come to a complete stop why did she have to swerve into oncoming traffic. In her scenerio she would have had time to react and at least start slowing down and braking hard herself. However, the black box indicated she didn't step on her brake until 0.5 sec before impact.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 2:57 pm to tiger91
quote:
Maybe he was going 28 the whole time and being an old fart.
We don’t know.
we do know. Attorney is misleading the sheep.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 5:22 pm to tiger91
quote:
I will say that she said she saw the green charger
In which case, her testimony is quite suspicious.
She's behind the gold truck. As they travel northbound and approach what would be the location of the accident, four vehicles pass her in oncoming, southbound traffic: a white SUV, an F150, a small dark SUV, and then another White SUV. She swerves into the other lane and Mr. Hall's dark SUV car hits her. There's another white SUV traveling southbound behind Mr. Hall's SUV. Then, there's KL's Charger. (This setup is indisputable, as it is clear on the video.)
It's not that she couldn't see it, but KL's Charger wasn't clearly threatening her. If she said that, her story doesn't really hold water.
ETA: This is why I now have a dash-cam in my truck. I was set up for a scam (my automatic brakes kept me from hitting someone who stopped cold on the interstate with no other traffic.) Next time, I will have the evidence.
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 10/6/25 at 5:30 pm to Thorny
Does anyone actually deny that Lacy was recklessly driving at a high rate of speed in oncoming traffic’s lane of travel? The lady bears some fault—maybe even a lot of the fault—for swerving into the opposite lane of travel but Lacy certainly bears some fault also for his reckless driving. It was reasonably foreseeable that driving at a high rate of speed into oncoming traffic would case a fatal accident, which is why the charge of negligent homicide was appropriate. Even taking Lacy’s attorney’s version of events as true, there seems to be no doubt that Lacy’s reckless driving was a significant cause of this fatal accident.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 5:31 pm to Adajax
quote:
Please correct me if I have this wrong, but if she saw him brake, then brake harder, then come to a complete stop why did she have to swerve into oncoming traffic. In her scenerio she would have had time to react and at least start slowing down and braking hard herself. However, the black box indicated she didn't step on her brake until 0.5 sec before impact.
I can’t explain any of it. I personally think she was too busy eating Funyuns and listening to her music and just not paying attention. But I wasn’t there and am not a forensic expert:traffic expert. And I don’t know the area.
How do we know how fast the gold truck was going? And I want to see another angle of the video and the gold truck black box.
Edit: wonder if anyone she knows posts here or knows of her new nickname? I do know the Kenny Lacy asked on his fb page to not crucify this girl .. that he knows what negativity can do to people.
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 10/6/25 at 5:36 pm to tiger91
Anyone who has ever been in a car accident knows that it happens very, very fast. Drivers sometimes physically cannot react in time to avoid the accident. Sometimes drivers faced with a sudden emergency instinctually make maneuvers that in hindsight are incorrect and ultimately case an accident or make an accident worse because of the speed at which the series of events that causes the accident unfolds. That seems to be what happened here.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:42 am to T1gerNate
Nobody, including the family lawyer, argues that Lacy wasn't driving too fast and illegally passed 4 cars.
The question is how much his actions set the other actions in motion.
The woman's testimony about Lacy's car and how much attention she was giving it doesn't seem to work, as there were several cars that should have gotten more of her attention. Thus, her testimony does not work, which automatically works in Lacy's favor. Add in the video of the truck driver saying that his braking wasn't panicked. Then add the data saying that the woman only braked a half a second before the accident, in conjunction with her turning the wheel aggressively, seem to suggest the woman was distracted in her driving, which was the main and possibly only cause of the accident.
There are some problems:
1) The data is more precise than what I thought was available from auto data collectors at this time.
2) The lawyer does not organize his argument very well, jumping around. For example, he should have had a much better diagram of the scene prepared than to draw if free-hand on the show. I suspect that kind of lack of preparation would not sail in court.
But, even considering these, the video alone implicates the woman at sole fault.
The question is how much his actions set the other actions in motion.
The woman's testimony about Lacy's car and how much attention she was giving it doesn't seem to work, as there were several cars that should have gotten more of her attention. Thus, her testimony does not work, which automatically works in Lacy's favor. Add in the video of the truck driver saying that his braking wasn't panicked. Then add the data saying that the woman only braked a half a second before the accident, in conjunction with her turning the wheel aggressively, seem to suggest the woman was distracted in her driving, which was the main and possibly only cause of the accident.
There are some problems:
1) The data is more precise than what I thought was available from auto data collectors at this time.
2) The lawyer does not organize his argument very well, jumping around. For example, he should have had a much better diagram of the scene prepared than to draw if free-hand on the show. I suspect that kind of lack of preparation would not sail in court.
But, even considering these, the video alone implicates the woman at sole fault.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:44 am to APtiger
Go watch the new video the state police put out and the truck drivers account.
Popular
Back to top

1





