- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Don’t Fold
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:20 am
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:20 am
1. A Texas judge already blocked this rule. Bryson Warren’s TRO expressly bars the SEC from enforcing eligibility rules against him or Texas A&M, which was issued the day after the 16-0 vote. The “we weren’t a party to the order” defense died on Aug. 26. LSU’s counsel should ask Judge Jorden for identical language Monday.
2. That order also kills the punishment threat. It bars the Rule of Restitution, which means no retroactive sanctions on the player or the school if the ruling is later reversed. The thing our administration is afraid of is precisely what a court just enjoined.
3. The SEC already set the standard in January, for Alabama. Charles Bediako signed a two-way NBA contract, played three G League seasons, and played five games for Alabama on a TRO. The Tide went 3-2. Sankey personally filed an affidavit against him. Alabama was never punished. Those wins still count.
4. And in February for Ole Miss. Chambliss is quarterbacking on an injunction the NCAA is still appealing.
5. And in July for Texas. Hutson exhausted his eligibility, worked Browns and Cowboys minicamps, sued, won, and rejoined the Longhorns.
6. Seven months of silence, then seven days. The SEC wrote no rule while Alabama, Ole Miss, and Texas benefited. It wrote one within a week of LSU winning. A principle isn’t discovered the moment a rival uses it.
7. Our players had no choice to make. Under the rules in effect last fall their careers were over nothing to withdraw from. They signed with NFL clubs in the SPRING. Then on June 23 the NCAA handed a fifth year to everyone, which was two months after they’d reported to camps.
8. They already paid the price a court demanded. The judge required them to terminate their NFL contracts and repay every dollar earned. They did it “allegedly.” Seven days later the SEC voted them out anyway.
9. A federal judge called the underlying rule likely illegal. Sweeney found no valid procompetitive justification and less restrictive alternatives available.
10. The SEC’s own line is arbitrary. Hutson is at Texas because no NFL team offered him paper. Both our guys were automatically allowed to sign with NFL teams due to no more eligibility. Junior Tuihalamaka never signed either. If Texas keeps its player and we lose ours, that’s not a rule that’s a target.
11. We voted for this 16-0 and abstained on penalties. Abstaining is not a position.
12. Nobody is better positioned. Live court orders, the resources, a coach on record. If LSU won’t test this, every program in this league learns that sixteen votes beat a judge.
TLDR: It’s about principle and you have a ton of ammo to support your fight.
2. That order also kills the punishment threat. It bars the Rule of Restitution, which means no retroactive sanctions on the player or the school if the ruling is later reversed. The thing our administration is afraid of is precisely what a court just enjoined.
3. The SEC already set the standard in January, for Alabama. Charles Bediako signed a two-way NBA contract, played three G League seasons, and played five games for Alabama on a TRO. The Tide went 3-2. Sankey personally filed an affidavit against him. Alabama was never punished. Those wins still count.
4. And in February for Ole Miss. Chambliss is quarterbacking on an injunction the NCAA is still appealing.
5. And in July for Texas. Hutson exhausted his eligibility, worked Browns and Cowboys minicamps, sued, won, and rejoined the Longhorns.
6. Seven months of silence, then seven days. The SEC wrote no rule while Alabama, Ole Miss, and Texas benefited. It wrote one within a week of LSU winning. A principle isn’t discovered the moment a rival uses it.
7. Our players had no choice to make. Under the rules in effect last fall their careers were over nothing to withdraw from. They signed with NFL clubs in the SPRING. Then on June 23 the NCAA handed a fifth year to everyone, which was two months after they’d reported to camps.
8. They already paid the price a court demanded. The judge required them to terminate their NFL contracts and repay every dollar earned. They did it “allegedly.” Seven days later the SEC voted them out anyway.
9. A federal judge called the underlying rule likely illegal. Sweeney found no valid procompetitive justification and less restrictive alternatives available.
10. The SEC’s own line is arbitrary. Hutson is at Texas because no NFL team offered him paper. Both our guys were automatically allowed to sign with NFL teams due to no more eligibility. Junior Tuihalamaka never signed either. If Texas keeps its player and we lose ours, that’s not a rule that’s a target.
11. We voted for this 16-0 and abstained on penalties. Abstaining is not a position.
12. Nobody is better positioned. Live court orders, the resources, a coach on record. If LSU won’t test this, every program in this league learns that sixteen votes beat a judge.
TLDR: It’s about principle and you have a ton of ammo to support your fight.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:21 am to Raging Tiger
I’m over it- this is honestly creating a major unneeded distraction a week before kick off. Time to move on
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:22 am to Raging Tiger
quote:
It’s about principle and you have a ton of ammo to support your fight.
It would be different if we needed to do this for a starting QB. I don’t think it’s worth it for some former ole Miss players just to add depth
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:25 am to JimTiger72
quote:
It would be different if we needed to do this for a starting QB. I don’t think it’s worth it for some former ole Miss players just to add depth
Until the starters get hurt…you can never have enough depth…
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:29 am to deathvalleyfreak43
Is it really causing a distraction for your players. We have a whole separate division that’s working on this. It’s not like Lane is sitting with lawyers instead of coaching.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:30 am to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:
this is honestly creating a major unneeded distraction a week before kick off. Time to move on
Nah.
Let the lawyers handle it and prepare like it’s not happening.
Worst case they add some depth or upgrade when the dust settles.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:31 am to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:
I’m over it- this is honestly creating a major unneeded distraction a week before kick off. Time to move on
This is more than just these players. The NCAA and SEC have fricked up majorly. They need to be put in their places, and actual clear and enforceable rules need to be in place to save college athletics. Moving on just perpetuates the problems and will lead to endless lawsuits.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:32 am to Slevin7
I am just blown away by the people that just fold at the first sign of resistance.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:37 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
Moving on just perpetuates the problems and will lead to endless lawsuits.
Yeah, and if you tell these players to kick rocks now, they'll sue LSU too.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:40 am to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:
I’m over it- this is honestly creating a major unneeded distraction a week before kick off
No it’s not, this is such a corny thing to say.
You honestly think the players (that are already on the roster) are worried about this shite like you are? I seriously doubt it. The team will be fine
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:40 am to Raging Tiger
quote:
Don’t Fold
It is so easy to be Billy Bad-arse from your computer keyboard when there are real-world administrators who have to make real-world decisions that could have major consequences if the wrong decision is made.
We have 100+ football players. Not picking up these extra players will not mean the death of the program. Time to move on. There is a game in 9 days.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:40 am to Raging Tiger
I too find it odd that LSU is being specifically targeted and not other schools doing similar things.
I think it’s become more about getting Lane than anything else.
I think it’s become more about getting Lane than anything else.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:41 am to JimTiger72
You’re doing it for a starting DT. All-SEC DT and TE.
You’re doing for the right reasons.
You’re doing for the right reasons.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:43 am to Raging Tiger
All this but this eligibility expired while they were still under the older rules. No other courts in the country are finding the 2022 class needs an extra year. The Colorado Federal court rejected it. Come on...this is BS
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 8:49 am
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:44 am to Raging Tiger
quote:
a starting DT.
We already have 2 of those. I am fine moving forward with who we have
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:44 am to LSUGrad9295
Yea I actually think we have an admin with a set of


Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:48 am to Raging Tiger
Dumb hill to die on for depth players. Move on
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:57 am to Raging Tiger
IF Kiffin and LSU coaches colluded/conspired with NFL players to sue the NCAA, he should be terminated immediately.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:57 am to bstew3006
You’re saying ah just let everyone else get away with it but it’s okay for LSU to not.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:58 am to Raging Tiger
I'm sure we will survive without these guys, but the SEC needs to get its' act together or the courts will decide for them.
Popular
Back to top

12










