- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do the umps make this call at Alex Box?
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:36 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:36 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:EXACTLY OUR POINT
That’s irrelevant here because the play is basically over already.
The play of fielding the ball is over. Thus, he can’t be in front of the plate anymore
1
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Look, the ball is so far behind the catcher before contact you can’t even see the freaking ball in the photo anymore
Do you not understand how silly it is to use a still photo to make a point in a play like that?
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Someone posted the rule and it is pretty clear the intent is the throw takes c into the path of the runner and not the c has the ability to just obstruct bc he is fielding the ball. The rule clearly says he is reacting to the throw caused him to be in the way. He made no reaction to the throw. He was standing in the same spot before the OF even caught the ball.
On stop of it all, the runner was sliding (albeit very early in the process) as the rule requires.
On stop of it all, the runner was sliding (albeit very early in the process) as the rule requires.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:38 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The play of fielding the ball is over. Thus, he can’t be in front of the plate anymore
Either he had a right to be there to field the ball at the time the ball got there or he didn’t. What happens to the ball after it comes to him is irrelevant in this argument.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:38 pm to AaronDeTiger
Next time he should duck.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:41 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:What?
Either he had a right to be there to field the ball at the time the ball got there or he didn’t. What happens to the ball after it comes to him is irrelevant in this argument.
So the second basemen is standing on the base to make an out at second. The ball is overthrown into the outfield
It’s cool for second baseman to continue standing on second impeding future runners?
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What about when the ball is over 10 feet behind the catcher?
My man you are trying so hard you are lying. The ball hit his glove as he was getting to his knees. lol.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:42 pm to STEVED00
A good throw to home plate will always force the catcher to “block” the plate in some way. Y’all are expecting the catcher to clear a path for the runner which is not the intent of the rule.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:43 pm to LSUtoBOOT
If college baseball does NOT want catchers blocking the plate then this decision here will end up causing more catchers to block the plate.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:43 pm to lsupride87
quote:
So the second basemen is standing on the base on make an out at second. The ball is overthrown into the outfield
You can not even count to 2 seconds from the time ball hit his mitt to the time the runner hit him. What are you even talking about? IT. HIT. HIS. MITT.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:43 pm to BallChamp00
quote:
My man you are trying so hard you are lying. The ball hit his glove as he was getting to his knees. lol.
Yeah but that 0.001 second after that, the ball was really far away so that’s illegal!
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:44 pm to BallChamp00
quote:My man the ball is completely out of the still frame here. NOT IN HIS glove. Here you go
My man you are trying so hard you are lying. The ball hit his glove as he was getting to his knees. lol.
Heading to his knees. Already missed the ball and he isn’t even on his knees yet
Now on this photo he is on his knees. Ball is so far behind him it’s gone.
You are the greasy liar
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:45 pm to AaronDeTiger
Runner focked up not even trying to slide
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:45 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Yeah but that 0.001 second after that, the ball was really far away so that’s illegal!
I’m legit trying to find out where a 10ft overthrow came from. Another video?
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:45 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
by Mickey GoldmillA good throw to home plate will always force the catcher to “block” the plate in some way. Y’all are expecting the catcher to clear a path for the runner which is not the intent of the rule.
bullshite especially coming from LF. Catcher chose to shorten the distance by several feet. Hell he was several feet up the line before the OF even caught the ball.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:45 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What? So the second basemen is standing on the base to make an out at second. The ball is overthrown into the outfield It’s cool for second baseman to continue standing on second impeding future runners?
We’re talking about milliseconds. You’re talking about 7-10 seconds in your example.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:
My man the ball is completely out of the still frame here. NOT IN HIS glove. Here you go
Right after the ball HIT his mitt and he thought he had it so he tagged him with two hands. lol. That’s not a 10ft overthrow.
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:48 pm to BallChamp00
quote:
Right after the ball HIT his mitt and he thought he had it so he tagged him with two hands. lol. That’s not a 10ft overthrow.
That’s a fancy way to say without the ball he dropped to his knees to block the plate even more
I said the ball was 10 feet last him. Not a 10 foot overthrow. You knew that though
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:50 pm to lsupride87
The fact is this a judgement call that should have been settled on field. No video review. People saying runner should have slid, he watched the catcher miss the ball. He figured he didn’t need too. To the people saying catcher obstructed, he was fielding the ball in baseline. The fact he missed it means nothing. This should have been an umpire meeting only call it live from what you saw.
Posted on 5/31/25 at 1:51 pm to lsupride87
quote:
That’s a fancy way to say without the ball he dropped to his knees to block the plate even more
You never caught or used a catchers mitt. You can see catcher for a sec thought he had ball. Which can happen. It’s not seconds tho. Bang bang.
Page 10 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News