- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did You Really Agree With Canada's Offense?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:21 pm to LongTime Tiger
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:21 pm to LongTime Tiger
quote:
agree but not for the reason of no I formation.
Agree, but it was terrible.
His offense is for teams that cannot physically dominate.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:22 pm to STRIPES
i would a liked to a seen what next year could a produced
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
His offense is the epitome of gimmick. What else do you think pre snap movement like we saw is for?
To read defense alignments and reactions. It helps you create mismatches and take advantage of hesitation on defense.
Think about this; defense is purely reactionary. If you create hesitation, the reaction is too late.
I thought Canada did outstanding considering a limited passing game and young online. He found other ways to move the ball.
Can't say that about other OCs we've had.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:25 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What else do you think pre snap movement like we saw is for?
For one it gives you an idea on how the defense will line up against different formations and personnel groupings and how they react to the motion. It can set things up later in the game. And it could also give the QB some clues about their coverage scheme. It's not just a gimmick. There is legitimate strategy involved.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:28 pm to STRIPES
i was looking forward to Canada's offense without a qb that wasnt a full field progression qb. Etling was barely a half field progression qb with zero pocket presence aside from a step up or two.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
His offense is for teams that cannot physically dominate.
you bitched when we had a physically dominating offense.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
His offense is the epitome of gimmick. What else do you think pre snap movement like we saw is for?
thanks for posting this. i shouldnt be surprised though. youre the guy that said Troy has more talent than LSU.
This post was edited on 12/28/17 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:31 pm to SulphursFinest
quote:
His red zone play calling was terrible. No I-Formation at all. Other than that, I liked it.
this. our stats prove how inadequate we were in red zone scoring. tds and fgs.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:31 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
you bitched when we had a physically dominating offense.
We had one, 2011. Offensive lines were underwhelming.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
His offense is geared toward lower tier teams with less talent.
How fricking dumb is this?
"Oh, his offense works when the players are less talented, but on a more talented offense, it doesn't work."
If a fricking offense works with less talented players, it works even better when the players are more talented.
quote:
RogerTheShrubber
But hey, such are the musings of one of the biggest dumbasses on this site.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:32 pm to STRIPES
I could not care less what type of offense they put out there if it works.
This offense eventually could've worked with the right pieces into place. Every offense is going to have growing pains when it is being installed. Just watch, this next season we're going to have a lot of the same struggles we had this past season.
This offense eventually could've worked with the right pieces into place. Every offense is going to have growing pains when it is being installed. Just watch, this next season we're going to have a lot of the same struggles we had this past season.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:33 pm to STRIPES
I would be fine with him staying.
Replacement will determine my happiness with his departure.
Replacement will determine my happiness with his departure.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:34 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
This offense eventually could've worked with the right pieces into place.
This year?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:34 pm to H-Town Tiger
Our runningbacks are powerful running behind a fullback, it’s one reason we have been highly successful in the past.
Miles ran entirely too much I-Formation, but in the redzone, we are hard to stop when we run behind a fullback.
Canada would never do it, and it bothered me. We had very few long runs because of that.
Miles ran entirely too much I-Formation, but in the redzone, we are hard to stop when we run behind a fullback.
Canada would never do it, and it bothered me. We had very few long runs because of that.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We had one, 2011. Offensive lines were underwhelming.
holy shite.
so now all of the sudden we didnt have great rushing games under miles?
also, no one that gets paid to evaluate oline play thinks the majority of our olines were bad.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:36 pm to dcrews
quote:
Below average QB
Etling was at least average. It’s not like he was Jordan Jefferson bad.
This post was edited on 12/28/17 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:37 pm to STRIPES
? He was trying to make chicken salad out of chicken droppings. LSU has had less than a QB for years now. Way less. If Coach A$$wipe doesn't stick his nose in things maybe 'BAma is the only loss. But noooooooooooo....Eaux keauxs offense and had to 'tweak' things resulting in two losses.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:37 pm to STRIPES
I didn’t hire him. And if I interviewed him I would vet him and know his offense before I hired him.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:39 pm to SulphursFinest
quote:
Our runningbacks are powerful running behind a fullback, it’s one reason we have been highly successful in the past.
Miles ran entirely too much I-Formation, but in the redzone, we are hard to stop when we run behind a fullback.
to be fair most running backs are better without having to pick their holes. running behind a fb pretty much takes away the decision making process from the rb(at the los).
quote:
Canada would never do it, and it bothered me.
i would be screaming," we have one of the best rb fullbacks in cfb(Moore),let Guice run behind him" when we would be in inside 5 or 10.
quote:
We had very few long runs because of that.
i never understood why he wouldnt at times use the rb blocking ability of our hback in between the tackles. he would always just use it off tackle and let an unblocked lb meet the rb.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 5:44 pm to Retrograde
quote:
Etling was at least average. It’s not like he was Jordan Jefferson bad.
you do realize that JJ's 2009 season was better than etlings season this year right? and that was with zero run game.
our leading rusher in 2009 had 542 yards
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News