- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:36 am to AlxPin
No they didn’t and the stats have been posted. Just because you keep repeating a lie like a libtard doesn’t make it come true.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:37 am to AlxPin
quote:
Wait, so in your eyes, an alter is anyone that disagrees with your agenda.
Keep in mind, I'm responding and explaining this not for you, but for those reading who may be interested in what's up.
No...you're not an alter because your POV disagrees with my own. You're either an alter or a paid plant because you just joined the largest LSU message board on Earth this past month. Now...that either makes you A) A teenager who is just now old enough to have started an account or B) New to the internet despite being some life long Tiger fan. LSU has been an absolute beast in football for nearly 20 years...a time frame that corresponds nicely with both messages boards as a means to discuss stuff like this AND this message board emerging. And yet...time and time again the newest posters just SOME HOW seem to be the most vocal, the most arrogant, the most argumentative, and seem to have the biggest agendas. Coincidence I guess...
quote:
have a completely different opinion than you, you don't like it, so I'm an alter. Fkn stupid.
Nope...at this point anyone that suddenly shows up out of the blue and is THIS argumentative for any side on this board should be looked at skeptically, and looked into by the admins...if they care to police having alters that is. Has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with me, but simply a way to keep discourse as honest as possible here.
If we are going to start having alters and paid plants posting nonstop all over the board, why have usernames at all? They're becoming meaningless...
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:37 am to Madking
If you take out the overtime outlier, the 2017 offense scored four more TDs in SEC play than the 2018 offense.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:37 am to Madking
quote:
I’m old enough to be your dad
This isn't something I'd brag about if I were you. You act like the biggest spoiled brat on this board.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:38 am to AlxPin
How many threads do they start? Sorry if people call out the polish punk’s minions. Fact is you guys try way too hard and that gives you away every time.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:39 am to Damone
quote:
you take out the overtime outlier, the 2017 offense scored four more TDs in SEC play than the 2018 offense
2018-421
2017-282
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:42 am to bencoleman
Lmao at you thinking what you say about someone matters in the slightest. You’re a lying scumbag, in top of that you start shite with people for no reason, sometimes people you’ve never seen before, then when people witness your disgusting behavior and call you on it you play victim. You’re a despicable human being, the absolute worst of the worst here.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:42 am to bencoleman
Lmfao you're too stupid to realize that you keep attempting to convince people that LSU averaged 52.6 ppg in SEC play last season. Lmfao lmfao you can’t make this shite up.
This post was edited on 7/3/19 at 9:45 am
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:43 am to bencoleman
You’re comparing total to vs conference
The 2018 offense did not score 421 points in regulation in conference. That would be 52 ppg
The 2018 offense did not score 421 points in regulation in conference. That would be 52 ppg
This post was edited on 7/3/19 at 9:44 am
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:44 am to Jaydeaux
quote:
How many threads do they start? Sorry if people call out the polish punk’s minions. Fact is you guys try way too hard and that gives you away every time.
Ree once called me out for...wait for it...not starting enough threads! As if starting a bunch of threads was an indicator of something other than a need to be noticed.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:45 am to bencoleman
Lol so the 2018 LSU average 52.6 points per game in SEC play? Lmfao lmfao
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:47 am to bencoleman
quote:
I posted totals
Then you are still wrong, because 2017 had 354 total points for. But that's a terrible metric because it includes defensive TDs and a field goal percentage. Offensive TDs drive winning no matter how you slice it.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:47 am to Madking
quote:
oach by Madking
Lol so the 2018 LSU average 52.6 points per game in SEC play? Lmfao lmfao
No the 2018 team scored 421 points total.
I posted totals. I didn't subtract for overtime or defensive scores. I didn't think the defensive scores would amount to that much. a couple of scores tops.
This post was edited on 7/3/19 at 9:53 am
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:49 am to GeauxTigerTM
Shhhh. So it's ok to bash the coaches and program, but DO NOT sign up and be positive. If I came in bashing O, like damone, you wouldn't say a word, and that's a fact. Fact is, it annoys you that people are happy and have a positive outlook.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:49 am to Damone
quote:
Why would you take out punt returns in regulation? Oh yeah, to try and balance out the complete outlier of a seven OT scoring opportunity.
If you remove that unquestionable outlier, the 2018 offense had the least amount of total TDs dating back to 2013 and the second to last amount of total TDs in SEC play during the same period. Even if you don't remove the outlier, 2013 and 2015 both had more total TDs and 2013, 2016 and 2015 all had more SEC TDs.
Going back to 2011, the offensive S&P+ rankings are as follows:
2018- 30
2017- 23
2016- 41
2015- 12
2014- 34
2013- 7
2012- 32
2011- 18
Trying to make the 2018 offense into something it clearly wasn't is a fool's errand.
Savage.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:49 am to Damone
quote:
Then you are still wrong, because 2017 had 354 total points for. But that's a terrible metric because it includes defensive TDs and a field goal percentage. Offensive TDs drive winning no matter how you slice
You are correct. It accounts for all points scored.
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:51 am to AlxPin
Lmfao you keep accusing others of pushing a narrative or having an agenda but you’re the only one here:
A- advocating for bans of opinions you disapprove of
B- scolding people for not being active enough or attacking posters you deem unworthy of having a voice here
A- advocating for bans of opinions you disapprove of
B- scolding people for not being active enough or attacking posters you deem unworthy of having a voice here
Popular
Back to top


0





