- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/14/10 at 10:57 am to snatchola
quote:
Do you think LSU has been a basketball powerhouse in the last 50 year?
how many schools can claim more NBA top 50 players than LSU? 0.
how many schools have been to more Final 4's than LSU? A handful.
To call LSU's basketball program over the last 50 years is naive and idiotic. Sure we haven't won a championship, not weak? Nah.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:36 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
how many schools have been to more Final 4's than LSU? A handful.
UNC, Duke, UCLA, Kansas, Kentucky,Ohio State, Louisiville, Indiana, MICH st, Arkansas, Cinnci, Ok State, Georgetown, Mich, Houston, Illinois
If you Houston ranks ahead of us, that says something.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:43 pm to snatchola
quote:yes, yes, and yes.
Would he even start this year for Kansas, Syracuse, or Kentucky?
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:50 pm to snatchola
quote:
you Houston ranks ahead of us, that says something.
do you know anything about college basketball history?
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:53 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
do you know anything about college basketball history?
enough to know LSU hasn't been dominant.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:56 pm to snatchola
quote:fail
enough to know LSU hasn't been dominant.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 1:03 pm to snatchola
LSU has a pretty rich basketball history with lots of great players. Maravich, Pettit, O'Neal, Macklin, Carter, Jackson, Davis....
Posted on 2/14/10 at 1:11 pm to Elleshoe
I guess our definition of "Lots" is different. I give you Petit, Maravich, O'Neal, Carter, Jackson, & Macklin. No doubt elite players. But that is close to where it stops. Sure guys like Davis, Bass, Taz, Henderson, Blanton, etc will go down as good players, but great? Forget about the Final four appearances. How many National Titles have they won. Dominant programs should have won multiple National Titles. LSU cannot claim to be a dominant college basketball program.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 1:12 pm to snatchola
no one said LSU is a domiant program. Rich history with alot of damn good players... Plus I bet LSU has a lot of guys who will turn out to be better pros than say Hansbrough. Just because the media tells us a guy is great doesn't make it so...
This post was edited on 2/14/10 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 2/14/10 at 1:57 pm to cbhughes
it better not be. he's a very good defensive player but he's not a complete player. his offensive game is not on the level to have it retired.
now, if he'd play more 4 or 5, he would've had an argument, but he can't make big buckets when we need them. this team is not completely untalented, they're in every game. blame whoever you want, but if they'd be winning, tasmin would be an unquestioned leader and great player.
garret temple needs his number retired before tasmin. but i love tasmin, glad to have watched him for the last 12 years he played at lsu.
now, if he'd play more 4 or 5, he would've had an argument, but he can't make big buckets when we need them. this team is not completely untalented, they're in every game. blame whoever you want, but if they'd be winning, tasmin would be an unquestioned leader and great player.
garret temple needs his number retired before tasmin. but i love tasmin, glad to have watched him for the last 12 years he played at lsu.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 4:25 pm to jrich11
quote:I understand the love for Temple. But why would Temples number be before Taz??
garret temple needs his number retired before tasmin
They were both 5 year players that both played in the final four, yet Taz had better numbers. Not sure I agree with Temple being ahead of Taz. Not putting Temple down though, dude was a VERY important piece to our final four run. But Taz was more important to the team last year that temple by far.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 9:36 pm to Zilla
quote:
big fan of taz, but I think a prereq is that you have to be able to touch the rim
quote:
Zilla
Stupid comment
Posted on 2/15/10 at 8:26 am to cbhughes
"0" ............Sorry Mr. Mitchell
Posted on 2/15/10 at 11:03 am to cbhughes
0% chance. based on the jerseys hanging, Tas would have to make 1st team All-America this year to be deserving. If you retire Tas then you have to talk about guys like Maurice Carter and Ricky Blanton. Very Good LSU players, just not in the same breath as Pettit, O'Neal, Maravich, and Macklin.
Posted on 2/15/10 at 11:06 am to cbhughes
I think Taz and Lamont Roland's jersey should be retired.
Posted on 2/15/10 at 1:02 pm to cbhughes
quote:I agree. If he hadn't returned, LSU might not have won a conference game.
I think after coming back this year, and given his incredibly hard effort on the court and team play, I think his jersey needs to be retired. I say 60% it will be retired.
Posted on 2/15/10 at 1:36 pm to RedStickCock
All I will say is that he has never been the best player on a good team. This is the only year he's been here where he is arguably the best player. This is also the worst team LSU has fielded in over 10 years, so that doesn't say much.
Tasmin's a solid all-around player, but he's not great at any aspect of the game.
As for players I'd put ahead of him:
Glen Davis
Chris Jackson
Rudy Macklin
Tyrus Thomas
Stromile Swift
Howard Carter
Brandon Bass
Ronald Dupree
Darrell Mitchell
JuMicheal Young
Just to name a few.
Tasmin's a solid all-around player, but he's not great at any aspect of the game.
As for players I'd put ahead of him:
Glen Davis
Chris Jackson
Rudy Macklin
Tyrus Thomas
Stromile Swift
Howard Carter
Brandon Bass
Ronald Dupree
Darrell Mitchell
JuMicheal Young
Just to name a few.
Popular
Back to top

0







