- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
:peej:
0
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:18 pm to DP40
quote:
You are stupid.
You're this on every board.
quote:
You are JUDGING Lee off of ONE game versus a Top-5 team under difficult circumstances.
Double Penetration 40, he's been at LSU for 3 years and in those 3 years he's been the same guy he was last night - with a moment here and there where he looked pretty good. Shake off the Lee love and admit he had a bad game and hope that he becomes serviceable over the next 2.
Also, did you pick up last night that for most of his career he's been overweight and uncommitted?
quote:
yet you are not calling him good, not even adequate, which means you think he was bad, now can you admit it?
Yeah - I'll admit I thought he was bad last night. I don't hate him. And I think it is possible that he could become serviceable. I don't love or hate Lee - he's just some kid that plays QB at my alma-mater - and so far not very well.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
no you'll see craig krenzell or greg mccelroy
jay barker also
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is typical!!! I want anybody in this thread to tell me what team in college football has a complete team. Every team had weaknesses. Our just so happen to be at the QB position we don't need a super as our QB we need a game manager and one who can make the throws when we need him to. And as far as I see JL is better than JJ. and Mett is not ready. Face it we have to deal
with JL for now he is the best we have We will ride this wave as long as we can. There will come a time in this season when we will JL to make a play but last night we didn't. Please let's just enjoy the good years. How many remember the late 80's and the 90's I think we have the best TEAM in America but the hardest schedule so let's see how we do.
with JL for now he is the best we have We will ride this wave as long as we can. There will come a time in this season when we will JL to make a play but last night we didn't. Please let's just enjoy the good years. How many remember the late 80's and the 90's I think we have the best TEAM in America but the hardest schedule so let's see how we do.
This post was edited on 9/4/11 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:21 pm to chRxis
quote:
hell, most of us fans didn't even know he was on the roster til that year.
WRONG. see 2001!!!!
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:21 pm to Navytiger74
PurpleKnight88:
Did you go to St. Aug?
Did you go to St. Aug?
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:22 pm to cwill
Matt MaucK was not a great QB by any means. Now think if we had someone like Kellen Moore....UNSTOPPABLE!!! That said, we can win with Lee!
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:22 pm to dukke v
quote:
Was he GREAT??/NO.
Right, he was much less than great.
quote:
n the feild before halftime for a score that changed the game??? Even after Oregon had a 16 playt scoring drive???
How do you know that? Were you on the sideline?
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
uh, he was the QB during the 2001 SEC title game, brah
due to Rohan being injured, but point taken...
quote:
not at all. he was a gunslinger
he turned the ball over WAY too much to be a game manager. same with flynn
the way you are talking, and it could be just the way i think you are implying it, you make it seem like the offense went through them no matter what, and that we were screwed if we couldn't throw the ball.... you forget we had good running teams then, as well as very good WR corps as well.... all they had to do was get the ball in the hands of the playmakers... that's what i mean by managing the game.... get the ball to the playmakers, don't turn it over, and make a play if need be....
i see similarities with Lee and Mauck and Flynn, and not just skin color... Lee is not going to be like 2008 Lee.... he just won't... he won't start throwing for insane amounts of yardage and multiple TD's every game either...
i think our disagreement is over semantics, but i could be wrong... and, when it comes down to it, i guess you have to ask yourself if you'd rather look bad and win, or look good and lose... i'll be concerned not so much over how many yards he throws for, but if he starts throwing to the other team again...
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:23 pm to cwill
quote:
Double Penetration 40
When losing an argument, insult the deceased...yeah, you don't know, but neither do you probably care either.
quote:
Also, did you pick up last night that for most of his career he's been overweight and uncommitted?
Flynn?
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:26 pm to chRxis
quote:
and that we were screwed if we couldn't throw the ball.
for the most part this was true
mauck had bad games against UF, Ole Miss, and UGA (1st time) and we lost 1 and almost lose the other 2
flynn was horrible against UK and left way too many points on the board in the firs thalf against arky
quote:
you forget we had good running teams then, as well as very good WR corps as well.
we have both this year
quote:
i guess you have to ask yourself if you'd rather look bad and win, or look good and lose.
there is a 3rd option: look good and win
the point of this thread is that we'd be THAT team if we had a good QB
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:26 pm to rballa19
quote:
Matt MaucK was not a great QB by any means. Now think if we had someone like Kellen Moore....UNSTOPPABLE!!! That said, we can win with Lee!
exactly. he sucked
I mean no way jimbo fisher along with Matt Mauck as his Qb set offensive records that year right?
ETA: that team broke the offensive records set in 2001.....then the 2007 team broke the records set by the 2003 team
This post was edited on 9/4/11 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:27 pm to DP40
quote:
When losing an argument, insult the deceased...yeah, you don't know, but neither do you probably care either.
You've been name calling in your last 3+ posts!
I just made fun of your screen name, and, you're right, I don't know you and don't care about its real meaning. :prayerssent:Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:28 pm to safetyman
quote:
Every team had weaknesses.
I don't really dispute this in general but what were the weaknesses on the 2003 NC team?
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
not at all. he was a gunslinger
Man you are stupid.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:29 pm to cwill
quote:
but what were the weaknesses on the 2003 NC team?
pre-JV, an explosive running game
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:30 pm to dukke v
quote:
Man you are stupid.
didn't mauck set the TD passing record for LSU in 2003?
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:30 pm to cwill
I'm not "name calling" but just telling the truth...
Truth hurts...Lee was good last night, yet some of y'all ARE too stupid to understand that.
Truth hurts...Lee was good last night, yet some of y'all ARE too stupid to understand that.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:30 pm to cwill
quote:
I don't really dispute this in general but what were the weaknesses on the 2003 NC team?
linebacker's ability to cover backs out of the backfield, cost us the Uf game and almost cost us the OU NC game.That is just defensively speaking since you asked for weaknesses. Does not imply the O was great in any of those games. we shoulda blown OU out if not for the TO's we had. 3 i believe. UF game was not Mauck's fault. UF was squatting on short routes all day and that is all jimbo wanted to throw until too late
This post was edited on 9/4/11 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 9/4/11 at 1:31 pm to cwill
quote:
How do you know that? Were you on the sideline?
I didn't have to be on the sideline to see this.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News