- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can we now admit there should be an open QB battle under the new regime?
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:15 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:15 pm to Lester Earl
quote:we are talking offense, that is where the QB plays
it could not be worse then 0-0 against the best team in the country?
They don't give you negative points, so yes ZERO is as bad as you can do.
quote:
literally could not be worse
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:16 pm to lsupride87
There absolutely should be. We shouldn't be locked into any one guy because non of them have been great.
Let a new coach evaluate them all (Etling, Harris, McMillan, Scott) under a new OC and system.
I'll flat out say, I think Harris has a higher ceiling than Etling. IF he can get his shite together and do the easy things asked of a QB. His strong arm and mobility don't amount to much though if he can't pull it all together.
If we hired Herman, I'd love to see what Harris and particularly Scott Jr could do in that system
Let a new coach evaluate them all (Etling, Harris, McMillan, Scott) under a new OC and system.
I'll flat out say, I think Harris has a higher ceiling than Etling. IF he can get his shite together and do the easy things asked of a QB. His strong arm and mobility don't amount to much though if he can't pull it all together.
If we hired Herman, I'd love to see what Harris and particularly Scott Jr could do in that system
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:20 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
literally could not be worse
It absolutely could have been worse. His back was to their end zone for a large part of the second half and the only turnover he had was when his arm was hit. He didn't do anything to improve our chances of winning, but he also didn't cost us based on bad decisions. The coaches don't have that same confidence in Harris.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:20 pm to RedTigerRulz
[quote]Well I certainly would not blame him for telling us to shove up our azzes.[quote]
Why would HE be mad? 15 starts isn't enough time?
Why would HE be mad? 15 starts isn't enough time?
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:23 pm to GRIZZ
quote:We got ZERO points. Explain.
It absolutely could have been worse
Would you feel better to lose 3-0, 10-0, 21-0, 35-0
quote:Why you think O was chewing his arse out? For a great job?
he also didn't cost us based on bad decisions
His decision to not hit two first down passes was pretty damning.
quote:Shouldn't this be kinda important for the most important position on the field.
He didn't do anything to improve our chances of winning
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:23 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
we are talking offense, that is where the QB plays
They don't give you negative points, so yes ZERO is as bad as you can do.
Let me ask you this;
in a 0-0 game, a turover by our offense, in which they would score off of, wouldnt be worse, in your estimation?
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:24 pm to Lester Earl
quote:why is this the new mantra? the assumption that Harris or anyone else turns it over and not only that, they score........shite we gotta raise the bar on expectations of the offense.
a turover by our offense, in which they would score off of, wouldnt be worse, in your estimation?
We were given great field position in the first half too...did everyone just forget that we turned that into ZERO points too.
There is zero evidence that Harris turns it over more.
I am NOT a Harris fan btw. But Etling was lost as a goose.
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:25 pm to lsupride87
Pretty sure Harris is done taking meaningful snaps at LSU.
Just listening to how Orgeron talks about it, and how he answered a question about Harris playing in his post-game Saturday, it doesn't seem likely.
Just listening to how Orgeron talks about it, and how he answered a question about Harris playing in his post-game Saturday, it doesn't seem likely.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:26 pm to Taurus
Etling was Turrible!!!! Even when he had no pressure He couldn't throw some passes. Let alone being able to move around in the pocket Harris couldn't been any worse.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:27 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Pretty sure Harris is done taking meaningful snaps at LSU.
Just listening to how Orgeron talks about it, and how he answered a question about Harris playing in his post-game Saturday, it doesn't seem likely.
doesn't really matter if Orgeron isn't retained
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:27 pm to PaulT78
quote:this part is all that Etling does above average, don't take that away from him.
Let alone being able to move around in the pocket
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:27 pm to Salmon
Did you hear Danielson say on two of the 5 sacks.... There's just no where to go with the football.
Sometimes taking a sack is better than risking a to.
This is all pointless.
It's just like deal with CEO... Some of you have an agenda against certain players and coaches and you want them gone and replaced with someone else you have no fricking clue if they are any better than what we have.
Change for the sake of change!
Sometimes taking a sack is better than risking a to.
This is all pointless.
It's just like deal with CEO... Some of you have an agenda against certain players and coaches and you want them gone and replaced with someone else you have no fricking clue if they are any better than what we have.
Change for the sake of change!
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:27 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
Etling was lost as a goose.
Have you not seen the same in Harris over and over again?
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:28 pm to GRIZZ
Lol
No shite.
Threads like these should require a bio and pic in order to post.
No shite.
Threads like these should require a bio and pic in order to post.
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:29 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:
Did you hear Danielson say on two of the 5 sacks.... There's just no where to go with the football.
no I was at the game
quote:
Sometimes taking a sack is better than risking a to.
of course, but a lot of those sacks and pressures were because he was holding the ball too long
quote:
This is all pointless.
It's just like deal with CEO... Some of you have an agenda against certain players and coaches and you want them gone and replaced with someone else you have no fricking clue if they are any better than what we have.
Change for the sake of change!
this sounds like an argument to keep Miles
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:30 pm to GRIZZ
quote:yes, of course.
Have you not seen the same in Harris over and over again?
No one is saying that Harris is the long term answer. Just that no one is sacred. And at points in the second half, a series wouldn't hurt anyone....the half where we got 20 yards of offense and zero points.
Harris has never been shut out either....so there is that too.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:31 pm to Salmon
quote:
a lot of those sacks and pressures were because he was holding the ball too long
That's not all on DE. You can thank our O line and OC for that. Quick short to intermediate pass plays were what needed to be called. He wasn't exactly set up to succeed.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:32 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
why is this the new mantra? the assumption that Harris or anyone else turns it over and not only that, they score........shite we gotta raise the bar on expectations of the offense.
Im not saying it's any type of mantra. Im addressing your statement that "it couldnt get any worse".
Popular
Back to top
