- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BRPD releasing the Koy Moore bodycam footage this afternoon.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:15 pm to ell_13
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:15 pm to ell_13
Reasonable cause alone means nothing.
I am Giving you an example of what the court upheld as reasonable suspicion.
This is how caselaw works. You don’t just get to sat “reasonable suspicion” and apply it where ever. There are precedents as to what “reasonable suspicion” is.
So 1 acceptable grounds for “reasonable suspicion” that someone is armed is having reasonable suspicion the crime they might be committing is one where people are “likely”
Armed.
Which is why being able to articulate what crime the cop suspects them off is relevant.
I am Giving you an example of what the court upheld as reasonable suspicion.
This is how caselaw works. You don’t just get to sat “reasonable suspicion” and apply it where ever. There are precedents as to what “reasonable suspicion” is.
So 1 acceptable grounds for “reasonable suspicion” that someone is armed is having reasonable suspicion the crime they might be committing is one where people are “likely”
Armed.
Which is why being able to articulate what crime the cop suspects them off is relevant.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:29 pm to ell_13
quote:
All you have to be is be reasonable suspicious that someone is hiding a weapon.
AND
quote:
And in determining whether the officer acted reasonably in such circumstances, due weight must be given, not to his inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or 'hunch,' but to the specific reasonable inferences which he is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his experience.
Same link Paragraph 30
Then you ask “well what facts are the courts looking for?”
And then you use examples of what the court has held as appropriate searches and what facts they thought supported it.
And we’re back to what in said.
It’s not the only grounds, but it’s one big specific one.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:29 pm to SammyTiger
Your pussy is still sore about this, isn't it?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:30 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
Your pussy is still sore about this, isn't it?
Not as sore as you’re a-hole from bending over and taking it from the cops.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:32 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
He was under duress when it happened and got some details wrong. That’s not uncommon
I’m pretty sure in 99% of situations, I will know if someone unzips my pants.
Moore fabricated half of his story to the point the Chief and Mayor made statements as well as LSU. If Moore doesn’t post on Instagram, this probably isn’t even a story.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:32 pm to SammyTiger
quote:I've forgotten more about law enforcement than you've tried to absorb over the last 24 hours.
Not as sore as you’re a-hole from bending over and taking it from the cops.
Legally, the officers did nothing wrong. If they did, they'd have been charged or still under investigation.
All of your crying and griping doesn't change that.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:33 pm to bubbz
quote:
Moore fabricated half of his story to the point the Chief and Mayor made statements as well as LSU. If Moore doesn’t post on Instagram, this probably isn’t even a story.
Half?
He was stopped
He was searched
He reached for his phone and his hand was grabbed
He had guns pointed at him.
He was told they were looking for guns or contraband.
Again. Most of his story is true.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:38 pm to ell_13
quote:
Sammy defended Moore for the tweet and thought the cops deserved being called out. He did, however, think that everyone who posted in the original thread said Moore was totally lying... which, ironically, is another lie from Sammy.
Sammy immediately took Moore at his word, but now says it’s not uncommon for people under duress to get their facts wrong when retelling a story.
It appears to me he’s going to defend Moore no matter what.
Now he does bring up some good questions about his cops are to handle themselves legally and ethically; however, these questions really have nothing to do with the main question st hand, was Moore telling the truth?
He’s thrown out ref herring after red herring and even has admitted Moore lied giving him an excuse, but the fact is for whatever reason Moore lied excuse or no excuse.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:41 pm to doubleb
quote:
Sammy immediately took Moore at his word, but now says it’s not uncommon for people under duress to get their facts wrong when retelling a story.
Minor details yeah.
Which is what happened here
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:45 pm to doubleb
quote:Aside from "being mean", what did those officers do that was either illegal or unethical?
Now he does bring up some good questions about his cops are to handle themselves legally and ethically
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:46 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
Aside from "being mean", what did those officers do that was either illegal or unethical?
Legally they aren’t allowed to go into his pockets unless the feel a gun or obvious contraband.
Second, their reasonable suspicion is very questionable.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:46 pm to SammyTiger
quote:saying cops unzipped your pants when you arent wearing zipper pants is minor details? are you retarded.
Minor details yeah.
Which is what happened here
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:50 pm to SammyTiger
quote:Wonder why they weren't charged? Why didn't Koy's lawyer file suit? Weak sauce.
Legally they aren’t allowed to go into his pockets unless the feel a gun or obvious contraband.
quote:In what way?
Second, their reasonable suspicion is very questionable.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:55 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
Wonder why they weren't charged? Why didn't Koy's lawyer file suit? Weak sauce.
It’s not a criminal act.
They have a year to file suit
quote:
In what way?
The only fact they’re relying on is that they were hiding which is a weak grounds for resonance suspicion.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:00 pm to SammyTiger
quote:It's not a criminal act to violate someone's 4th Amendment rights?
It’s not a criminal act.
quote:Do police need reasonable suspicion or probable cause to make contact with someone? Or both? Or neither?
The only fact they’re relying on is that they were hiding which is a weak grounds for resonance suspicion.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:02 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
It's not a criminal act to violate someone's 4th Amendment rights?
It is not.
quote:
Do police need reasonable suspicion or probable cause to make contact with someone? Or both? Or neither?
To seize them, meaning they aren’t free to go, they need at least reasonable suspicion. This was legally a seizure.
You need probably cause to arrest someone.
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:07 pm to SammyTiger
quote:Ah.
It is not.
quote:So we agree that the officers did nothing criminal?
To seize them, meaning they aren’t free to go, they need at least reasonable suspicion. This was legally a seizure.
You need probably cause to arrest someone.
Excellent.
Now, is it just about them being mean to the football player that has you so emotional?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:09 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
I've forgotten more about law enforcement than you've tried to absorb over the last 24 hours.
You say this
quote:
Legally, the officers did nothing wrong. If they did, they'd have been charged or still under investigation.
Then you say this and I know you’re full of shite.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:12 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
So we agree that the officers did nothing criminal?
Are you simple?
Legally a seizure means it was a seizure by legal definition.
I didn’t say this was a seizure that was legal.
And again, you can break the lw without it being criminal.
Cops violate the 4th amendment all the time, most of them aren’t arrested for it. They courts just throw out evidence.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:12 pm to SammyTiger
I’ve read every page...
And you are by far one of the most idiotic posters I have come across. If you were a cop and used the thought process you exhibit here, you would get trampled (mentally and physically).
Your main arguments aren’t consistent with the video.
Your main retort is to call someone a bootlicker.
For someone who insinuates the cops were scared and had to pull guns, I can only assume (as you’ve done so often) that you would shite bricks if you had a night shift in NBR.
And you are by far one of the most idiotic posters I have come across. If you were a cop and used the thought process you exhibit here, you would get trampled (mentally and physically).
Your main arguments aren’t consistent with the video.
Your main retort is to call someone a bootlicker.
For someone who insinuates the cops were scared and had to pull guns, I can only assume (as you’ve done so often) that you would shite bricks if you had a night shift in NBR.
Popular
Back to top


2




