- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Both teams looked very beatable
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:54 am to TheSexecutioner
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:54 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:LSU and Alabama both hang 40 on those teams.
But, let me ask, what makes everyone so confident that a team with an adequate defense and awesome passing offense(Boise, Stanford, OU, Oklahoma St) couldn't beat LSU(team with awesome defense but only adequate offense?)
0
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:54 am to MadtownTiger
Can admins just ban stupid people like the OP?
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:54 am to TheSexecutioner
no they didn't
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:54 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
Signed, Steelers vs. Patriots last week.
So since one elite passing attack on the road only threw for 200 yards against an elite difference that is the trend?
Why didn't you sign that Rodgers vs Steelers in the Super Bowl? Wouldn't you agree that is become more of the trend.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:56 am to geaux from largo
quote:
TheSexecutioner
Do you realize you made a boo boo here yet? The problem could be that either you don't know football or you can't differentiate between video games and reality.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:56 am to TheSexecutioner
You are aware that both Offenses were destroying other teams prior to facing each other right?
The avg margin of victory for both teams was insane.
Unless you consider almost 40 points a game as pitiful.
The avg margin of victory for both teams was insane.
Unless you consider almost 40 points a game as pitiful.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:57 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
So since one elite passing attack on the road only threw for 200 yards against an elite difference that is the trend?
Why didn't you sign that Rodgers vs Steelers in the Super Bowl? Wouldn't you agree that is become more of the trend.
I just think you're dumb. Even discussing the NFL is dumb.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:57 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:College isn't the pros, just like high school isn't college.
TheSexecutioner
LSU and Bama have put up about 40 on every other opponent they played. Average defenses allow our offenses to score a lot more while our great defenses shut down other offenses.
This isn't rocket surgery.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:58 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
And don't give me this "great defenses beat good offenses nonsense." If that were the case, the NFL wouldn't be becoming such an offensive game. With a good quarterback, there is just no way to cover all receivers regardless of how great a defense is.
I didnt know we scheduled the Saints this year
These are the two greatest defenses in CFB and they can shut down any offense in the NCAA. Yes both offenses looked terrible because they could barely gain an inch on what was basically two NFL defenses
It was great defense not bad offense. Look at the big plays, Mos interception was a great play on the ball, Reid interception was an insane play on the ball, no defense can get the type of pressure that those two teams did. Both QBs had sbout 2 seconds to throw every time and no open recievers
Just because its not frickin Oklahoma or okie state scoring a thousand ponts doesnt mean its a bad thing, now go learn something about football and STFU
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:58 am to TheSexecutioner
You my friend, are fricking retarded.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 10:59 am to Lester Earl
quote:Urban Meyer said the LSU defense was the best he'd ever seen.
they were bad, but you must understand how the defense and tempo dictated the gameplans you saw.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:00 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
What teams could take advantage of the weaknesses you saw in each team last night? Just because they each looked beatable against the best team each has played all year, what makes you think that there are similarly talented teams elsewhere that could actually take advantage of the perceived shortcomings?
I'll address this, since it's not dripping with homerism. What makes me think that is the fact that the passing offenses were so useless. Regardless of how good a pass defense is, a great quarterback(Luck, Moore, Jones) will be able to complete passes a reasonable amount of times. They can throw receivers open. Both teams passing games were useless. A testament to the defenses, yes. But only the biggest of SEC homers think that those were two top 5 offenses getting shut down.
To quote Dennis Dodd: This sets up a clash of styles. Why can't the SEC recruit quarterbacks. Why can't the Big 12 find a d-tackle to save its life?
I do not argue that we are the
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:01 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
And don't give me this "great defenses beat good offenses nonsense."
Do you remember the first 8 games these teams have played? Scoring 35+ points per game?
Of course it was the great defenses that controlled the game. But, as been proven, against other defenses, these offenses score a lot of points.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:01 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
But, let me ask, what makes everyone so confident that a team with an adequate defense and awesome passing offense(Boise, Stanford, OU, Oklahoma St) couldn't beat LSU(team with awesome defense but only adequate offense?)
I think Bama had alot to do with how LSU'S o looked last night. Could Okie State move the ball on lsu?? Sure, But could Okie st. come close to stopping LSU???? NO.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:02 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
Both teams looked very beatable
By each other
quote:
But, let me ask, what makes everyone so confident that a team with an adequate defense and awesome passing offense(Boise, Stanford, OU, Oklahoma St) couldn't beat LSU(team with awesome defense but only adequate offense?)
Those teams could be LSU, but LSU has better athletes every where. Our offense looked pathetic against far and away the best D we can face. Have you seen the other games we've played?
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:02 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
Both teams looked very beatable
Yeah, by an NFL team, that's about it.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:03 am to NC_Tigah
Here's an interesting question for the OP.
Did Ohio State and Michigan both look very beatable in 2006 after that 42-39 game?
Did Ohio State and Michigan both look very beatable in 2006 after that 42-39 game?
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 11:04 am
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:03 am to tubucoco
you're out of your mind
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:04 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
Both teams looked very beatable
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:05 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
But only the biggest of SEC homers think that those were two top 5 offenses getting shut down.
I hve seen NOBODY say this. You need to watch some more football and quit GUESSING.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News