Started By
Message

re: Biggest Missed Opportunities in LSU Sports History

Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:00 pm to
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10455 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

The Bama game was A setback we are STILL feeling....
Yeah, no LSU fan in their right mind likes that feeling, but remember LSU almost got them in 2012, so not sure it's some lasting effect from 19-12.
Saban has out-recruited and passed LSU up along with most of the rest of the SEC.
quote:

1-9-12 was A total disaster ALL AROUND.
I agree. The OL really got their asses handed to them.
Posted by Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
13493 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:29 pm to
Perrilloux
This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 7:49 pm
Posted by AlbinoGator
Member since Oct 2016
2380 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:17 pm to
Wayne Huizenga in the Miami dolphins plane on the tar Mack in baton rouge in DECEMBER 04'
Posted by RedlandsTiger
Greenwell Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2008
3128 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

4) Bo Rein's plane going down on LSU recruiting trip. 5) Paul Dietzel leaving LSU to coach at Army.


This is good, and Saban going to the NFL
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12084 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 2:44 am to
quote:

Dismissal of Ryan Perilloux. He likely changes the perception of LSU as a poor destination for top QBs. Probably alter the perception of some regarding Les Miles as well


In the previous decade LSU QBs included Josh Booty, Craig Nall, Rohan Davy, Matt Mauck, Jamarcus Russel and Matt Flynn who all went on to play in the NFL and Herb Tyler who was a good college quarterback. Perriloux would not have positively altered the perception of Tiger quarterbacks but would have continued their favorable ratings.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48018 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 2:51 am to
quote:

So the offense only had long drives for two TD'S... Ok... You make it sound like the offense won that game... which is stupid... They had ZERO 1st downs in the 1st half.... The defense and ST play won that game.... There is really nothing to debate about here....





bruh you can't even remember your on stances.
you told me a bad offense in a win is more productive
than an offense in a loss regardless of the yards gained.

now that is doesn't for your stance you're not applying that logic anymore.


you literally told me that......

an offense with 1 yard of offense in a win
IS MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN....
an offense with 600 yards in a loss.


why aren't you applying this logic now?


fricking hypocrite.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:04 am to
quote:

an offense with 1 yard of offense in a win IS MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN.... an offense with 600 yards in a loss.

The offense was NOT very productive in that game.. JJ sucked monkey balls.. ZRO 1st downs in the 1st half????

Now I never said the win wasn't good.... I said the offense sucked which it did...
And yes I will STILL stand by my statement that 1 yard and A win is better than 500 and A loss...

But you don't know the sport on an elementary level so I can see how you would not understand this point.. You have an agenda and its ALL about defending Miles at all costs.... You NEVER show up in A miles thread until someone says something negative about him... Then you troll the thread until its ruined.... BTW At least now I know what 4188 means... That's your employee number at the Wal- mart you stock shelves at...
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48018 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:13 am to
quote:

The offense was NOT very productive in that game.. 




you said

an offense with 1 yard in a loss
IS MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN
an offense with 600 yards in a win.


why are you changing that bullshite stance now?

quote:

And yes I will STILL stand by my statement that 1 yard and A win is better than 500 and A loss..


so then shut the frick about the offense in the seccg.

quote:

But you don't know the sport on an elementary level so I can see how you would not understand this poi


because it's fricking ignorant.
offenses can be more productive in a loss.
you're doing that ignorant thing you do where you take someone's post and turn it into something they never said.

I never said I'd take a more productive offense in a loss.

I said...

An offense with 600 yards in a loss
IS MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN
an offense with 1 yard in a win.

at no point do I say Id rather have a 600 yards in loss.

quote:

But you don't know the sport on an elementary leve


says the guy that didn't know what an individual record as in cfb.

quote:

ou have an agenda and its ALL about defending Miles at all costs.

stating objective facts isn't an agenda.
it's called reality.
quote:

You NEVER show up in A miles thread until someone says something negative about him.



quote:

Then you troll the thread until its ruined.... 


yeah how dare I post FACTS.
quote:

BTW At least now I know what 4188 means... That's your employee number at the Wal- mart you stock shelves at...

bruh....
you live in a trailer.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:22 am to
quote:

And yes I will STILL stand by my statement that 1 yard and A win is better than 500 and A loss..




quote:

so then shut the frick about the offense in the seccg.







quote:

I never said I'd take a more productive offense in a loss.


bullcrap... You have talked many times how great the offense was against Ole Miss where we got creamed 38-17 yet we had 538 yards of offense... You made that sound like it was A good thing... LOSING 38-17 is BAD no matter how many yards you get... With 538 yards we should have gotten more than 17 points... That's NOT productive...

Geez you are stupid.. Its football basics which I am seeing that you have ZERO clue about....
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48018 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:38 am to
quote:

You have talked many times how great the offense was against Ole Miss where we got creamed 38-17 yet we had 538 yards of offense.


the offense was ok. at no fricking point have I said the offense was great.

you see this is how you operate.
you take my post of," we actually moved the ball pretty well against ole miss".
into....."our offense was great against 2013 ole miss"

quote:

You made that sound like it was A good thing... L


don't blame me for your 2nd grade reading comprehension skills.
quote:

LOSING 38-17 is BAD no matter how many yards you get...


no shite. I've never said otherwise.
quote:

With 538 yards we should have gotten more than 17 points... That's NOT productive... 



538 yards is more productive than 400 yards.

you don't understand basic math.

quote:


Geez you are stupid.. Its football basics which I am seeing that you have ZERO clue about....




I had to explain why the word,"SUBJECTIVE"means to you.
you didn't know what an individual record in cfb was.
if I asked you why the 5 route was your have to look it up.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:42 am to
quote:

538 yards is more productive than 400 yards.



Not if you only score 17 points...



quote:

you take my post of," we actually moved the ball pretty well against ole miss". into....."our offense was great against 2013 ole miss"


What does 2013 have to do with anything.. That's the last game YOU should bring up considering Miles... They lost to A team that had 8 starters out on defense and had A ton of freshman playing with A top 5 team.. They shite the bed against a totally outmanned Ole Miss squad... But you have excuses for that too I am sure....
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48018 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:51 am to
quote:

Not if you only score 17 points... 



if this is your stance then why are you shitting on the offense in the 2011 seccg?
we won. you should have no issues with that offensive output.
the simple fact that you can't see you're being hypocritical is astounding.
quote:


What does 2013 have to do with anything..

I accidentally put 2013. my bad.
quote:

They lost to A team that had 8 starters out on defense and had A ton of freshman playing with A top 5 team.. 

Nick saban loses to an inferior team every year.
O lost to a team that is had 1 player drafted since 2012 and doesn't have a single top 95 cost since 2012.
where was this outrage then?
even after the troy loss you deem 2017"a pretty good record".
quote:

They shite the bed against a totally outmanned Ole Miss squad... But you have excuses for that too I am sure....


I count 2015 ole miss as an unacceptable loss.

you do know that 2016 Florida was missing 7 starters right?

where we your outrage after that game?
This post was edited on 1/27/18 at 3:56 am
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 3:57 am to
quote:

you do know that 2016 Florida was missing 7 starters right? where we your outrage after that game?



I have said A ton of times that loss was all O... I have said TON of times BOTH the MSU and Troy losses were on O....


quote:

Nick saban loses to an inferior team every year.


Yet he won NC'S.... After 1-9-12 Miles became Saban's BITCH... FACT.........



quote:

even after the troy loss you deem 2017"a pretty good record".


Well its better than 4-8 which is what you hoped O would do this season... FACT.. You are hoping O will fail just to get your rocks off by saying it was a bad hire....
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48018 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 4:01 am to
quote:

Yet he won NC'S.... After 1-9-12 Miles became Saban's BITCH... FACT...


saban has made cfb his bitch

quote:

Well its better than 4-8 which is what you hoped O would do this season... FACT.. You are hoping O will fail just to get your rocks off by saying it was a bad hire..


cool.
you're just further proving that you hate miles more than you like lsu.

it must really hurt your vag to know miles is the most accomplished coach in lsu history.

and thanks for admitting you wanted lsu to lose under miles.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 4:04 am to
quote:

you're just further proving that you hate miles more than you like lsu.


Where have I EVER said I hate Miles????
Ive been following LSU since 1971...



quote:

it must really hurt your vag to know miles is the most accomplished coach in lsu history


Not at all.. He did great here...


quote:

and thanks for admitting you wanted lsu to lose under miles.



LINK????
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48018 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 4:08 am to
quote:

Where have I EVER said I hate Miles???


there is no way that you don't hate miles.
you have a problem with anyone that posts facts about lsu from 2005-2013.
quote:

LINK???


a link? I'm using the logic you apply to every other poster that questions ed orgeron. are you saying that you can question the lsu coach and still want lsu to win?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 4:15 am to
quote:

there is no way that you don't hate miles


Based on what???
He is A great guy and did great things for LSU... But he had very bad moments that I call him out on and YOU go crazy when I do that... Think about it...
Posted by TampaTiger22
Tampa, FL
Member since Jul 2012
6669 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 5:05 am to
You mean the jimbo that didn't want to come here? That jimbo?
Posted by TampaTiger22
Tampa, FL
Member since Jul 2012
6669 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 5:08 am to
That is correct, but the rant seems to be full of experts and once again, prove they have no clue
Posted by Boom_boom
Member since Nov 2015
766 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 6:00 am to
4) hiring a shrimp boat captain instead of a guy that has a resume to back up the job he’s being hired for.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram