Started By
Message

re: As the season draws closer and closer, Oregon fans get crazier and crazier

Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:01 am to
Posted by LSUTigerfaninHtown
President of the OT as of 5/26/11
Member since Nov 2008
24433 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:01 am to
Wow, that was a serious rant.
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:15 am to
My reward for boring the crap out of some LSU fans above this. You have repeatedly asked for more hot UO Cheerleaders. Ask and you Shall Receive.









This post was edited on 6/1/11 at 4:52 am
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:17 am to
quote:

Wow, that was a serious rant.


Ya, it was. That jack-wagon ticked me off spouting lies. And that's why I rewarded LSU fans with some Oregon T&A to offset the long boring rant. ~Enjoy
This post was edited on 6/1/11 at 4:31 am
Posted by LSUTigerfaninHtown
President of the OT as of 5/26/11
Member since Nov 2008
24433 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:23 am to
quote:

So how does a guy paste any pictures on these threads without having to use "links", so you can just see them in real time?


Click the "img" button to the right of the text box and paste in the url.
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:27 am to
.
This post was edited on 6/1/11 at 4:37 am
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:48 am to
quote:

Your Conference is last in flying to games
We do most of our OOC flying after the reguar season.
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 5:17 am to
quote:

We do most of our OOC flying after the reguar season.


Funny, but you are right. 5 NFL SEC league teams did fly but however got beat.

Arkansas got beat by Ohio St.
South Carolina got beat by Florida St.
Tennessee got beat by North Carolina.
Georgia got beat by University of Central Florida.
Kentucky got beat by Pittsburgh.

But pardon me if I don't believe the spin that the SEC is the NFL extension division and all the others are pathetic.
Posted by jpbTiger
Tampa FL
Member since Dec 2007
5038 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 5:36 am to
Good work Ducks.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:16 am to
quote:

Tennessee got beat by Refs.
Fify.
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79466 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:16 am to
quote:

Funny, but you are right. 5 NFL SEC league teams did fly but however got beat.

Arkansas got beat by Ohio St.
South Carolina got beat by Florida St.
Tennessee got beat by North Carolina.
Georgia got beat by University of Central Florida.
Kentucky got beat by Pittsburgh.


Then there are the 5 that also flew and won...once again if you are going to give details give them all...

LSU beat Texas A&M
Auburn beat Oregon
Miss St beat Michigan
Alabama beat Michigan St
Florida beat Penn St




Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Then there are the 5 that also flew and won
4 outa 5 of those were pretty much skulldruggery.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49999 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:35 am to
quote:

2003 Arizona ........ vs LSU .............. L 13-59

2004 Oregon St ..... @ LSU .............. L 21-22 (ot)

2005 Arizona St .... vs LSU .............. L 31-35

2006 Arizona ......... @ LSU .............. L 03-45

2009 Washington .. vs LSU .............. L 23-31
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49999 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Tennessee got beat by North Carolina.
Tennessee got FUCCKKED by a 'loop hole' in the rules in that game
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:53 am to
quote:

once again if you are going to give details give them all...


LOL, I only did not give them all because I am on a LSU forum and every single person already knows them all. Why post the obvious.

I only posted the 5 losses because A)it dispels the SEC= NFL myth. B)The SEC is not as strong top to bottom as many claim (see Loosing to UCF and Pitt).
You see, for years we have been used to the moronic comments by some SEC Kool-aid drinkers such as "if Vandy were in the PAC 10 they would of went undefeated".

And other SEC logic of:

1) Pac10 team is no good
2) SEC will pound them
3) When Pac10 team wins, the SEC played very badly since the Pac10 team is no good
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49999 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:02 am to
quote:

if Vandy were in the PAC 10 they would of went undefeated".
I dont think anyone would go that far.... we know why Vandy is in the SEC; helps the GPA


quote:

The SEC is not as strong top to bottom as many claim
maybe not all the way but a SEC team usually plays more highly ranked and talented teams during the regular season than a PAC team does.


BCS Bowl wins and appearances by conference
Florida (5-1)
LSU (4-0)
Georgia (2-1)
Alabama (1-2)
Tennessee (1-1)
Auburn (2-0)
Arkansas (0-1)
SEC = .714

USC (5*-1)
Oregon (1-1)
Oregon State (1-0)
Washington (1-0)
Stanford (1-1)
UCLA (0-1)
Washington State (0-1)
PAC = .643*
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:03 am to
quote:

2003 Arizona ........ vs LSU .............. L 13-59

2004 Oregon St ..... @ LSU .............. L 21-22 (ot)

2005 Arizona St .... vs LSU .............. L 31-35

2006 Arizona ......... @ LSU .............. L 03-45

2009 Washington .. vs LSU .............. L 23-31


Gee, I did not know of those games. Thanks for sharing.

True, but also true...

2003 #UR Zona 13 v. #13 LSU 59
Zona 1-7 PAC10 (2-10)
*LSU 7-1 SEC (13-1) Division Champions

2004 #UR OSU 21 @ #4 LSU 22(OT)
OSU 5-3 PAC10 (7-5)
*LSU 6-2 SEC (9-3)

2005 #15 ASU 31 v. #5 LSU 35
ASU 4-4 PAC10 (7-5)
*LSU 7-1 SEC (11-2)

2006 #UR Zona 3 @ #8 LSU 45
Zona 4-5 PAC10 (6-6)
*LSU 6-2 SEC (11-2)

2009 #UR UW 23 v. #11 LSU 31
Washington 4-5 PAC10 (5-7)
*LSU 5-3 SEC (9-4)

Thus:

Unranked Zona vs #13 LSU
Unranked OSU vs #4 LSU
#15 ASU vs #5 LSU
Unranked Zona vs # 8 LSU
Unranked Wash vs #11 LSU

Gee, congrats...

(next up #3 Oregon VS #4 LSU -your going to have to earn this puppy)
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49999 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:06 am to
quote:

Gee, I did not know of those games. Thanks for sharing.
you dont have to be a dick, dude.... I was just reposting LSU's wins
Posted by BoynamedLeslie
Member since May 2011
203 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:08 am to
A. No one seriously believes the SEC schedules a hard OOC schedule we did this year but thats not usually the case.

B.This "Gauntlet" of Pac-12 conference play is a joke right? This gauntlet of yours allows us to schedule non-AQ teams and still beat out your strength of Schedule by a landslide

C. You said when USC was dominant they only lost to PAC teams because its so competitive but then go on to cite that bigger SEC teams lose to Ole Miss and Tenn

D. Just because we root for each other in the post-season and always show pride in our conference does not mean we are not fierce rivals and every game( except against Vandy) is considered a big rivalry

And finally i look at Oregon's schedule and see maybe 3 good games...maybe in LSU, Stanford, and maybe Arizona State and USC

LSU on the other hand has 8 Oregon, Miss St., West Virginia, Auburn, Alabama, Florida, and Arkansas

How can you argue that we have a weak schedule when we are cited as having the toughest schedule in CFB next year?
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:32 am to
quote:

maybe not all the way but a SEC team usually plays more highly ranked and talented teams during the regular season than a PAC team does.


Only if you use circular reason by not hardly playing out of Conference during the regular season and only playing D-2 schools and Non BCS schools and only playing internally.

Think of it this way. Your in a 12 member family of 12 brothers. You are all fighters. And down the street are 5 more more with around 12, (give or take) fighters in each family. You claim you have the strongest family top to bottom each year. However mostly what you rather do is just fight internally. And each other family fights all the others regularly. You pick on 4th graders and junior boys to pad your boxing records. Yes lately in the champ bout, you have won 5 straight. Usually only because you only had 1 good fighter that year in your family and or the other guy was overrated. All the other families see you as good, no doubt, but you choose not to fight all the other fighters in each family to prove it much. You choose to fight 4th graders and junior boys which normally you wipe pretty bad(except for OleMiss).

You claim to all the other ones that not only do you have the top dog each year but also you are the best top to bottom. Yet, you still continue to schedule way more 4th graders and junior high boys each year to pad your records so you can attempt to boast like that. All the other fighters fight each other's family regularly all the time while you focus on 4th and 7th graders. But there is one family top to bottom that has beat all the leading 6 families more. (that would be the PAC 10). And all the while, you have media spin and spin and spin claiming your the best top to bottom and you say, look at our record(which is loaded with 4th graders) to prove it. And because of that fact, the media ranks all fighters way absurdly high to start each year in your family. And when one fighter looses, "hey, he did not do so bad, he only lost to the 6th best fighter", which comes out of your own family. And so on and so on. And you use a circular argument to prove your point, all because too many of your fighters in your family got way highly over-ranked to start the year(see Floria, Georgia, USC jr ect.). It happens every single year.

And on top of boasting you are the best top to bottom, you continue to schedule mainly 4th and 7th graders, which ticks off the others because they fight each family all the time. And also, one family fights each other more internally then you(which means more internal losses) and does not usually fight the 4th graders; and all in a row unlike one family who schedules a 4th grader to fight at the end of the year for a for sure win and nice break to rest.

And on top of it all, again, one family has a higher percentage of wins vs all the other main 6. (PAC) And not only that, but one family when they settle it not by polls but actual fighting each other head to head actually beats you more.(PAC)

And to top it off, your family claims you descended from aliens and from a tribe called NFL. But actual play on the field shows hardly a demonstration of this claim.

Your a good fighting family, no doubt, but just not all you claim to be is all. And you are diffidently not descended from the alien tribe called the NFL-extension.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49999 posts
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:39 am to
We have each othetr on our schedule, so throw that out.

your other OOC games are Nevada and Missouri State.... real power houses there!
Ours are Northwestern and WKU, cupcakes, no argument here

2010:
UO
Portland State
New Mexico
Tennessee
LSU
UNC
WVU
ULM
McNeese


2009:
UO
Boise
Purdue
Utah
LSU
Washington
ULL
Tulane
LaTech

I'd say our OOC is a push
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram