- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: As the season draws closer and closer, Oregon fans get crazier and crazier
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:01 am to DucksflyinPAC
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:01 am to DucksflyinPAC
Wow, that was a serious rant.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:15 am to DucksflyinPAC
My reward for boring the crap out of some LSU fans above this. You have repeatedly asked for more hot UO Cheerleaders. Ask and you Shall Receive.
This post was edited on 6/1/11 at 4:52 am
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:17 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Wow, that was a serious rant.
Ya, it was. That jack-wagon ticked me off spouting lies. And that's why I rewarded LSU fans with some Oregon T&A to offset the long boring rant. ~Enjoy
This post was edited on 6/1/11 at 4:31 am
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:23 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
So how does a guy paste any pictures on these threads without having to use "links", so you can just see them in real time?
Click the "img" button to the right of the text box and paste in the url.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:27 am to LSUTigerfaninHtown
.
This post was edited on 6/1/11 at 4:37 am
Posted on 6/1/11 at 4:48 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:We do most of our OOC flying after the reguar season.
Your Conference is last in flying to games
Posted on 6/1/11 at 5:17 am to Mayhawman
quote:
We do most of our OOC flying after the reguar season.
Funny, but you are right. 5 NFL SEC league teams did fly but however got beat.
Arkansas got beat by Ohio St.
South Carolina got beat by Florida St.
Tennessee got beat by North Carolina.
Georgia got beat by University of Central Florida.
Kentucky got beat by Pittsburgh.
But pardon me if I don't believe the spin that the SEC is the NFL extension division and all the others are pathetic.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:16 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:Fify.
Tennessee got beat by Refs.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:16 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Funny, but you are right. 5 NFL SEC league teams did fly but however got beat.
Arkansas got beat by Ohio St.
South Carolina got beat by Florida St.
Tennessee got beat by North Carolina.
Georgia got beat by University of Central Florida.
Kentucky got beat by Pittsburgh.
Then there are the 5 that also flew and won...once again if you are going to give details give them all...
LSU beat Texas A&M
Auburn beat Oregon
Miss St beat Michigan
Alabama beat Michigan St
Florida beat Penn St
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:30 am to LSURulzSEC
quote:4 outa 5 of those were pretty much skulldruggery.
Then there are the 5 that also flew and won
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:35 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
2003 Arizona ........ vs LSU .............. L 13-59
2004 Oregon St ..... @ LSU .............. L 21-22 (ot)
2005 Arizona St .... vs LSU .............. L 31-35
2006 Arizona ......... @ LSU .............. L 03-45
2009 Washington .. vs LSU .............. L 23-31
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:36 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:Tennessee got FUCCKKED by a 'loop hole' in the rules in that game
Tennessee got beat by North Carolina.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 6:53 am to LSURulzSEC
quote:
once again if you are going to give details give them all...
LOL, I only did not give them all because I am on a LSU forum and every single person already knows them all. Why post the obvious.
I only posted the 5 losses because A)it dispels the SEC= NFL myth. B)The SEC is not as strong top to bottom as many claim (see Loosing to UCF and Pitt).
You see, for years we have been used to the moronic comments by some SEC Kool-aid drinkers such as "if Vandy were in the PAC 10 they would of went undefeated".
And other SEC logic of:
1) Pac10 team is no good
2) SEC will pound them
3) When Pac10 team wins, the SEC played very badly since the Pac10 team is no good
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:02 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:I dont think anyone would go that far.... we know why Vandy is in the SEC; helps the GPA
if Vandy were in the PAC 10 they would of went undefeated".
quote:maybe not all the way but a SEC team usually plays more highly ranked and talented teams during the regular season than a PAC team does.
The SEC is not as strong top to bottom as many claim
BCS Bowl wins and appearances by conference
Florida (5-1)
LSU (4-0)
Georgia (2-1)
Alabama (1-2)
Tennessee (1-1)
Auburn (2-0)
Arkansas (0-1)
SEC = .714
USC (5*-1)
Oregon (1-1)
Oregon State (1-0)
Washington (1-0)
Stanford (1-1)
UCLA (0-1)
Washington State (0-1)
PAC = .643*
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:03 am to mylsuhat
quote:
2003 Arizona ........ vs LSU .............. L 13-59
2004 Oregon St ..... @ LSU .............. L 21-22 (ot)
2005 Arizona St .... vs LSU .............. L 31-35
2006 Arizona ......... @ LSU .............. L 03-45
2009 Washington .. vs LSU .............. L 23-31
Gee, I did not know of those games. Thanks for sharing.
True, but also true...
2003 #UR Zona 13 v. #13 LSU 59
Zona 1-7 PAC10 (2-10)
*LSU 7-1 SEC (13-1) Division Champions
2004 #UR OSU 21 @ #4 LSU 22(OT)
OSU 5-3 PAC10 (7-5)
*LSU 6-2 SEC (9-3)
2005 #15 ASU 31 v. #5 LSU 35
ASU 4-4 PAC10 (7-5)
*LSU 7-1 SEC (11-2)
2006 #UR Zona 3 @ #8 LSU 45
Zona 4-5 PAC10 (6-6)
*LSU 6-2 SEC (11-2)
2009 #UR UW 23 v. #11 LSU 31
Washington 4-5 PAC10 (5-7)
*LSU 5-3 SEC (9-4)
Thus:
Unranked Zona vs #13 LSU
Unranked OSU vs #4 LSU
#15 ASU vs #5 LSU
Unranked Zona vs # 8 LSU
Unranked Wash vs #11 LSU
Gee, congrats...
(next up #3 Oregon VS #4 LSU -your going to have to earn this puppy)
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:06 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:you dont have to be a dick, dude.... I was just reposting LSU's wins
Gee, I did not know of those games. Thanks for sharing.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:08 am to DucksflyinPAC
A. No one seriously believes the SEC schedules a hard OOC schedule we did this year but thats not usually the case.
B.This "Gauntlet" of Pac-12 conference play is a joke right? This gauntlet of yours allows us to schedule non-AQ teams and still beat out your strength of Schedule by a landslide
C. You said when USC was dominant they only lost to PAC teams because its so competitive but then go on to cite that bigger SEC teams lose to Ole Miss and Tenn
D. Just because we root for each other in the post-season and always show pride in our conference does not mean we are not fierce rivals and every game( except against Vandy) is considered a big rivalry
And finally i look at Oregon's schedule and see maybe 3 good games...maybe in LSU, Stanford, and maybe Arizona State and USC
LSU on the other hand has 8 Oregon, Miss St., West Virginia, Auburn, Alabama, Florida, and Arkansas
How can you argue that we have a weak schedule when we are cited as having the toughest schedule in CFB next year?
B.This "Gauntlet" of Pac-12 conference play is a joke right? This gauntlet of yours allows us to schedule non-AQ teams and still beat out your strength of Schedule by a landslide
C. You said when USC was dominant they only lost to PAC teams because its so competitive but then go on to cite that bigger SEC teams lose to Ole Miss and Tenn
D. Just because we root for each other in the post-season and always show pride in our conference does not mean we are not fierce rivals and every game( except against Vandy) is considered a big rivalry
And finally i look at Oregon's schedule and see maybe 3 good games...maybe in LSU, Stanford, and maybe Arizona State and USC
LSU on the other hand has 8 Oregon, Miss St., West Virginia, Auburn, Alabama, Florida, and Arkansas
How can you argue that we have a weak schedule when we are cited as having the toughest schedule in CFB next year?
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:32 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
maybe not all the way but a SEC team usually plays more highly ranked and talented teams during the regular season than a PAC team does.
Only if you use circular reason by not hardly playing out of Conference during the regular season and only playing D-2 schools and Non BCS schools and only playing internally.
Think of it this way. Your in a 12 member family of 12 brothers. You are all fighters. And down the street are 5 more more with around 12, (give or take) fighters in each family. You claim you have the strongest family top to bottom each year. However mostly what you rather do is just fight internally. And each other family fights all the others regularly. You pick on 4th graders and junior boys to pad your boxing records. Yes lately in the champ bout, you have won 5 straight. Usually only because you only had 1 good fighter that year in your family and or the other guy was overrated. All the other families see you as good, no doubt, but you choose not to fight all the other fighters in each family to prove it much. You choose to fight 4th graders and junior boys which normally you wipe pretty bad(except for OleMiss).
You claim to all the other ones that not only do you have the top dog each year but also you are the best top to bottom. Yet, you still continue to schedule way more 4th graders and junior high boys each year to pad your records so you can attempt to boast like that. All the other fighters fight each other's family regularly all the time while you focus on 4th and 7th graders. But there is one family top to bottom that has beat all the leading 6 families more. (that would be the PAC 10). And all the while, you have media spin and spin and spin claiming your the best top to bottom and you say, look at our record(which is loaded with 4th graders) to prove it. And because of that fact, the media ranks all fighters way absurdly high to start each year in your family. And when one fighter looses, "hey, he did not do so bad, he only lost to the 6th best fighter", which comes out of your own family. And so on and so on. And you use a circular argument to prove your point, all because too many of your fighters in your family got way highly over-ranked to start the year(see Floria, Georgia, USC jr ect.). It happens every single year.
And on top of boasting you are the best top to bottom, you continue to schedule mainly 4th and 7th graders, which ticks off the others because they fight each family all the time. And also, one family fights each other more internally then you(which means more internal losses) and does not usually fight the 4th graders; and all in a row unlike one family who schedules a 4th grader to fight at the end of the year for a for sure win and nice break to rest.
And on top of it all, again, one family has a higher percentage of wins vs all the other main 6. (PAC) And not only that, but one family when they settle it not by polls but actual fighting each other head to head actually beats you more.(PAC)
And to top it off, your family claims you descended from aliens and from a tribe called NFL. But actual play on the field shows hardly a demonstration of this claim.
Your a good fighting family, no doubt, but just not all you claim to be is all. And you are diffidently not descended from the alien tribe called the NFL-extension.
Posted on 6/1/11 at 7:39 am to DucksflyinPAC
We have each othetr on our schedule, so throw that out.
your other OOC games are Nevada and Missouri State.... real power houses there!
Ours are Northwestern and WKU, cupcakes, no argument here
2010:
UO
Portland State
New Mexico
Tennessee
LSU
UNC
WVU
ULM
McNeese
2009:
UO
Boise
Purdue
Utah
LSU
Washington
ULL
Tulane
LaTech
I'd say our OOC is a push
your other OOC games are Nevada and Missouri State.... real power houses there!
Ours are Northwestern and WKU, cupcakes, no argument here
2010:
UO
Portland State
New Mexico
Tennessee
LSU
UNC
WVU
ULM
McNeese
2009:
UO
Boise
Purdue
Utah
LSU
Washington
ULL
Tulane
LaTech
I'd say our OOC is a push
Popular
Back to top



0




