- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
are you all worried that we lose our spot with a loss?
Posted on 12/4/19 at 5:36 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 5:36 am
The narrative this week is that they only look at last week's games, past record be damned!
14
Posted on 12/4/19 at 5:38 am to IndianInBR
Yes
Posted on 12/4/19 at 5:42 am to IndianInBR
It is OVER with a loss. NY6 bowl
Posted on 12/4/19 at 5:43 am to IndianInBR
I’m not worried about losing to begin with
Posted on 12/4/19 at 5:43 am to IndianInBR
That is not the narrative at all. No one has ever said “only last weeks game”. The narrative is “blank slate each week and judge the entirety of the schedule including the most recent game”
Not saying I believe that. But, it is never said that only last weeks game count.
Not saying I believe that. But, it is never said that only last weeks game count.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:28 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
The narrative is “blank slate each week and judge the entirety of the schedule including the most recent game”
This seems like double speak. How can one simultaneously say we are going to start with a blank slate, but then also include all of the past? Doesn’t make any sense.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:31 am to Revelator
Of course it makes sense. A team that has a back loaded schedule may be rated lower because they’ve not proven anything. This week- they beat a great team.
No reason to keep them low rated because they were the week before. “Blank slate” means ranking position. Not as if you know nothing about them at all.
No reason to keep them low rated because they were the week before. “Blank slate” means ranking position. Not as if you know nothing about them at all.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 6:32 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:33 am to IndianInBR
We are going to roll Georgia out of Georgia 
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:33 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
I just find the blank slate comment stupid. All they have to say is, we consider the entire body of work each week.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:34 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
A blank slate each week will help LSU. Beating UGA should get us to 1.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:35 am to IndianInBR
Sure but if we can’t beat GA, we wouldn’t beat Ohio State and possibly Clemson.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:36 am to IndianInBR
We arent losing...especially to Georgia. This will be another Auburn game but without the red zone snafu. We win by 2-3 scores.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 6:40 am to IndianInBR
I doubt we get in with a loss, if Utah beats Oregon. We might get in over The B12 winner but it would be close.
Regardless, we want the SEC Title!
Regardless, we want the SEC Title!
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:09 am to IndianInBR
I ain't worried about a loss, so....
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:17 am to IndianInBR
Historically, late losses, even conf champ games, have hurt more than early losses.
The CFPPC "reserves the right" to make assessments of progress. If your last data point is down, that is a decline; you don't have the opportunity to show it was anomaly like you would in week 6.
Oregon and Bama losing gave us a little insurance. But losing to UGA does put us in a crowded field of 1-loss teams, at least one of them (OU/Baylor) will be a conf champ and UGA will be a conf champ, in this scenario.
I don't think the cmte would do it, but the door is definitely open in that scenario. It's best to beat the absolute dog shite out of UGA, get that pennant, hope for #1 and play in Atlanta two weeks in a row against Utah/OU/Baylor... if we can.
The CFPPC "reserves the right" to make assessments of progress. If your last data point is down, that is a decline; you don't have the opportunity to show it was anomaly like you would in week 6.
Oregon and Bama losing gave us a little insurance. But losing to UGA does put us in a crowded field of 1-loss teams, at least one of them (OU/Baylor) will be a conf champ and UGA will be a conf champ, in this scenario.
I don't think the cmte would do it, but the door is definitely open in that scenario. It's best to beat the absolute dog shite out of UGA, get that pennant, hope for #1 and play in Atlanta two weeks in a row against Utah/OU/Baylor... if we can.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:21 am to IndianInBR
Only if OSU loses too. Since apparently they're better than us in the eyes of the committee that'll put clemson, OSU, UGA at 1, 2, and 3. Then we're battling for spot number 4 with oklahoma. Baylor, and Utah. I still think we should get #4 but that's way too close for comfort
Eta: i guess it doesnt matter if osu loses. I need coffee
Eta: i guess it doesnt matter if osu loses. I need coffee
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 7:34 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:24 am to lsutigermall
quote:
Sure but if we can’t beat GA, we wouldn’t beat Ohio State and possibly Clemson.
I agree with that. Out of the 4, UGA is the most inferior
Posted on 12/4/19 at 8:04 am to IndianInBR
Since the committee is against the SEC and in love with the big 10, we will drop out
Posted on 12/4/19 at 8:17 am to IndianInBR
Yes.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 8:39 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
It is OVER with a loss. NY6 bowl
Actually they have been saying the top 3 are locked in pretty much regardless unless there is just some massive collapse
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News