- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anthony Jennings, Maquedius Bain, and Dwayne Thomas Arrested and Suspended
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:31 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:31 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
No. Bain bought it on Craigslist. Cops did not.
of course the cops didnt buy it on CL.
was bain arrested?
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:32 pm to dnm3305
quote:
Im saying it's not likely when it's known that they will be given cool stuff all the time.
Okay, so you're just making up facts to prove your crazy arse position. Gotcha...
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:33 pm to dnm3305
quote:
It's pretty ridiculous honestly
What's really ridiculous is you interjecting into the conversation the possibility of these items being ill gotten. There is absolutely no reason to even assume that they may have been received through improper avenues.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:35 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
No. Bain bought it on Craigslist. Cops did not.
We need LSUFreek to whip of some GIFs of Bain and Jennings conducting their own investigation ala True Detective.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:37 pm to TheWhizzinator
Whizzanator whizz off!
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:38 pm to CptBengal
quote:
So you should RA to have it whacked.
Even the Advocate wont report such spurious rumors.
wut?
quote:
Keep trying though.
ummm...wut?
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:39 pm to Choctaw
I thought posting bullshite rumors is a case for getting whacked.
I'll let you delete or RA yourself before I step in...
I'll let you delete or RA yourself before I step in...
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:40 pm to CptBengal
quote:
I thought posting bullshite rumors is a case for getting whacked.
I'll let you delete or RA yourself before I step in...
knock yourself out, Nancy
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:41 pm to CptBengal
quote:
was bain arrested?
I find it hard to believe you're that obtuse but you've convinced me.
Why don't you go read all the news stories, the 42 TD pages on this very subject and then come back and try to have an intelligent discussion on what you've read?
Oh, and read slow. Reading comprehension is your friend.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:04 pm to Red Stick Tigress
It's a simple question, are you unable to answer?
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:06 pm to Choctaw
quote:Correct.
so apparently the story now is that they were let into the home and were waiting...then forced themselves into the guy's bedroom to get their stuff.
if true...does this change things at all?
The roommate let them into the apartment. He then went into his own room. At this point, no crime has been committed.
Thomas allegedly "broke" into Anderson's room. One or more of them went into the room, and Thomas allegedly walked out with some items. It would seem that the charges arise from these actions.
CptBengal:
quote:This has got to be some of the finest irony in the history of irony.
link?
CptBengal:
quote:Just when you thought posts could not get more ironic.
So you should RA to have it whacked.
Even the Advocate wont report such spurious rumors.
Keep trying though.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:10 pm to Salviati
quote:
so apparently the story now is that they were let into the home and were waiting...then forced themselves into the guy's bedroom to get their stuff.
if true...does this change things at all?
Correct.
How is this correct?
he even said he made it up and has no proof.
Hack.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:16 pm to SportTiger1
Glossy Eyes and Large pupils says it all.


Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:17 pm to CptBengal
quote:Because it is correct.
How is this correct?
quote:No. That's not what he said:
he even said he made it up
quote:LINK (Emphasis added.)
no link...just something i heard
quote:This could be enormous fun for me just based on your posts in this thread.
Hack.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:19 pm to Salviati
So he heard something (questionable in itself) and you claim that it is "correct"?


Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:23 pm to CptBengal
quote:Yes, it is correct. It was reported in several places. Have you not read any of the articles concerning this event?
So he heard something (questionable in itself) and you claim that it is "correct"?
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:24 pm to Salviati
quote:
It was reported in several places.
then link one up.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:24 pm to CptBengal
It could be inferred with some certainty from the Advocate article that they did not break in to the apartment itself.
The roommate was there, he would have heard them attempting to break in, but only comes out of his room when he hears them trying to enter his roommate's bedroom? That wouldn't make sense.
Now, it certainly is possible that the main door wasn't locked and that's how they gained access, but the article says they entered the apartment, and then broke into the room.
So it wouldn't be rumor that they were allowed in, more of a plausible interpretation of events.
The roommate was there, he would have heard them attempting to break in, but only comes out of his room when he hears them trying to enter his roommate's bedroom? That wouldn't make sense.
Now, it certainly is possible that the main door wasn't locked and that's how they gained access, but the article says they entered the apartment, and then broke into the room.
So it wouldn't be rumor that they were allowed in, more of a plausible interpretation of events.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:26 pm to CptBengal
quote:There is a video in the thread where the roommate explained what happened.
then link one up.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:26 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
Now, it certainly is possible that the main door wasn't locked and that's how they gained access, but the article says they entered the apartment, and then broke into the room.
So it wouldn't be rumor that they were allowed in, more of a plausible interpretation of events.
they ENTERED the apartment doesnt mean they were allowed in. It just means they didnt break down a door to get in. They waited a few minutes to start with the destruction of property.
No worries though, this will all come out in the wash.
Popular
Back to top


1




