- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anonymous opposing coaches talk LSU
Posted on 5/25/19 at 5:59 pm to lsu2006
Posted on 5/25/19 at 5:59 pm to lsu2006
I think people are underestimating the returning online.Returning QB,Returning wide receivers.Our offense should be top 4 in SEC,and possibly tip 2.If we have a truly dynamic running game to compliment Burrow we should have the best offense we have had in recent history.To me that means being able to get a first down how ever u choose to close out a game.Having defenses on their heels dictating the flow of the game.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:00 pm to The First Cut
The only redeeming thing Joe Alleva did during his tenure was tell Ed Orgeron to back TF off Dave Aranda. There's one he attempted to circumvent.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:01 pm to earl keese
quote:
Was the special council against the constitution or illegal? I'll give you the point of not accepting facts though.
BTW- SCOTUS has struck down the left-coast activist judges more times in the last two years than you’d care to admit.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:03 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
Aranda was the first one that came to my mind as well.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:04 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
The only redeeming thing Joe Alleva did during his tenure was tell Ed Orgeron to back TF off Dave Aranda. There's one he attempted to circumvent
Link please.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:04 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Not accepting a special counsel’s year-long, $25 million investigation because it doesn’t fit your agenda is akin to not accepting the rule of law.
You mean like why we needed 9 Benghazi investigations?
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:08 pm to J2thaROC
I know in your mind a fake dossier about pissing on prostitutes written as the basis for spying on American citizens is akin to the murder of American dignitaries by foreign insurgents, but for us normal people, they are not.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:09 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Link please.
You didn’t need a link to help push a rumor about an LSU player having run ins with the law involving guns and drugs. Why do you need a link now?
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:13 pm to lsu2006
Posting a link wouldn’t make a difference. Remember yesterday when you asked him for a link and he flipped out?
This post was edited on 5/25/19 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:13 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
No I was just referring to the fact that the INVESTIGATIONS found nothing with Benghazi as well yet time after time, it wasn’t ACCEPTED by the Republican because it didn’t fit their AGENDA.
Both sides are guilty of this same bullshite. None of them work together for what it actually best for the country and instead try to further line the pockets of their donors and lobbyists. The American government is a broken system. You are seeing the beginning of the end of it.
Both sides are guilty of this same bullshite. None of them work together for what it actually best for the country and instead try to further line the pockets of their donors and lobbyists. The American government is a broken system. You are seeing the beginning of the end of it.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:17 pm to J2thaROC
I understand your point, but the two are completely different.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:29 pm to earl keese
Earls a Democrat, it all makes sense now
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:30 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Not accepting a special counsel’s year-long, $25 million investigation because it doesn’t fit your agenda is akin to not accepting the rule of law.
Benghazi ring a bell to you?
quote:
BTW- SCOTUS has struck down the left-coast activist judges more times in the last two years than you’d care to admit.
I'm sure you think in that wind tunnel you call a head that you just had a GOTCHA moment, but the SCOTUS striking down left-coast activist judges more times in the last two years than I'd care to admit doesn't bother me one bit.
Try again Mr. Politics.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:30 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
You don't think coaches matter all that much.
In running a program, absolutely.
Game to game, it's more about the talent
This post was edited on 5/25/19 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:32 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
No one. Another straw man.
Put yourself on record.
Give name an estimate for rushing/passing yards this ear?
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Earls a Democrat,
I am?
quote:
it all makes sense now
Roger reads something and just jumps to conclusions. It all makes sense now.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:33 pm to earl keese
quote:
Benghazi ring a bell to you?
Where Americans died and the White House lied?
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:35 pm to la_birdman
quote:
Posting a link wouldn’t make a difference.
No it wouldn't. A link would just piss him off more than he already is.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Earls a Democrat, it all makes sense now
Worse than that he's progressive filth. It sure explains a lot. Why am I not surprised.
Posted on 5/25/19 at 6:40 pm to bencoleman
Oh Lord. It's turned into a political debate. Sure fire sign that this thread is d-u-n done.
Popular
Back to top


0





