- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alleva has denied Wade a golden opportunity
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:32 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:32 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
They do if the NCAA is watching HOW you handle this situation. Because, if you don't deal with it forcefully and immediately, The NCAA may levy the dreaded "Lack of Institutional Control" label on your program. That would be very very bad.
And this is the crux of it all. LSU believes the NCAA will ease up on sanctions if they play along. That is so wrong, it’s hard to even imagine a rational person thinking it’s true.
What is the NCAA watching closely? A media report from October and another from March? Because that’s that is out there. They aren’t investigating LSU, there is not notice of allegations.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:34 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Instead of giving Wade a chance to respond these fricking idiots get the NCAA involved from jump street and tell wade he can’t bring a lawyer.
WOW. The NCAA requested to be in the meeting. If you are LSU, you do not tell the NCAA "NO." Also, LSU (& the NCAA) wanted to hear directly from WW with no interference from a lawyer. LSU HAS THAT RIGHT. WW DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DICTATE TERMS TO HIS EMPLOYER.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:35 pm to Gray Tiger
No he is not. He is refusing to meet with the NCAA present in the meeting. He was going to meet with them until our compliance department said it would be a good idea if the NCAA would also join the meeting. I’m not sure if you know how the NCAA works. Neither LSU or WW is under investigation right now. In order for an investigation to start the NCAA would:
1st - Send LSU a letter of inquiry
2nd - The NCAA waits for LSU’s response in writing to the specifics of the said allegations of the LOE
3rd - The NCAA then determines if they want to accept LSU’s finding of said allegations pertaining to the LOE
4th - If they are not satisfied with the response from LSU they would then send a letter to LSU notifying them that an investigation will begin in reference to the said allegations.
5th - From that point going forward the investigation continues. It could take a few months or usually it takes over a year for the investigation to wrap up
6th - When the investigation is complete they will determine if punishment is warranted. This usually takes time also.
Just a few references about investigations
Ole Miss football took a couple of years
North Carolina basketball took a couple of years ( and guess what. They found no wrong doing. HAHA)
Now back to your original wrong statement. Why would anyone agree to the NCAA sitting in on a meeting if you are not being OFFICIALLY investigated. Only Joe Aleeva and our compliance department would think this would be a good idea
1st - Send LSU a letter of inquiry
2nd - The NCAA waits for LSU’s response in writing to the specifics of the said allegations of the LOE
3rd - The NCAA then determines if they want to accept LSU’s finding of said allegations pertaining to the LOE
4th - If they are not satisfied with the response from LSU they would then send a letter to LSU notifying them that an investigation will begin in reference to the said allegations.
5th - From that point going forward the investigation continues. It could take a few months or usually it takes over a year for the investigation to wrap up
6th - When the investigation is complete they will determine if punishment is warranted. This usually takes time also.
Just a few references about investigations
Ole Miss football took a couple of years
North Carolina basketball took a couple of years ( and guess what. They found no wrong doing. HAHA)
Now back to your original wrong statement. Why would anyone agree to the NCAA sitting in on a meeting if you are not being OFFICIALLY investigated. Only Joe Aleeva and our compliance department would think this would be a good idea
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:36 pm to DBG
quote:
LSU believes the NCAA will ease up on sanctions if they play along. That is so wrong, it’s hard to even imagine a rational person thinking it’s true.
Because it is true. This is how the NCAA deals with schools who are in trouble. They have done this in the past. Check your history.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:38 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Wrong the NCAA did not request anything our brilliant administration reached out first
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:39 pm to Irish LSU Fan
And they have slammed schools who cooperate also.
The infraction is the infraction. Don’t help them, make them do the work.
The infraction is the infraction. Don’t help them, make them do the work.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:39 pm to Irish LSU Fan
If there is no investigation, Wade is under no requirement to talk to the NCAA.
This is a specious argument and not realistic.
If there was a relationship of trust between Alleva and Wade, I’m sguessing he would have gone to the meeting. But, because of things Alleva has done, no one trusts him.
For Alleva and King to have brought in lawyers and the ncaa, and not allowing Wade to bring his, they proved they could not be trusted.
This is a specious argument and not realistic.
If there was a relationship of trust between Alleva and Wade, I’m sguessing he would have gone to the meeting. But, because of things Alleva has done, no one trusts him.
For Alleva and King to have brought in lawyers and the ncaa, and not allowing Wade to bring his, they proved they could not be trusted.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:40 pm to DBG
Alleva
Because I'm point out the obvious truth? BTW obscene name calling is an admission that you have lost the debate.
So Wade broke NCAA rules which could likely result in serious penalties, is that right?
What is supposed to be discussed here is:
So If Wade broke NCAA rules how is this Alleva's fault? Did he make him break the rules?
If I'm to believe you, he took a big chance in breaking NCAA rules.
Then he took another chance by refusing to meet with Alleva.
So how is this
Apparently the title should read: "Wade has denied Wade a golden opportunity"
The point is; no matter if many of you hate Alleva, this is a problem of Wade's making. Not Alleva's
quote:
Gray, you retarded piece of shite
Because I'm point out the obvious truth? BTW obscene name calling is an admission that you have lost the debate.
quote:
That’s not what’s being discussed here
So Wade broke NCAA rules which could likely result in serious penalties, is that right?
What is supposed to be discussed here is:
quote:quote:has denied Wade a golden opportunity
Alleva
So If Wade broke NCAA rules how is this Alleva's fault? Did he make him break the rules?
If I'm to believe you, he took a big chance in breaking NCAA rules.
Then he took another chance by refusing to meet with Alleva.
So how is this
quote:
Alleva has denied Wade a golden opportunity
Apparently the title should read: "Wade has denied Wade a golden opportunity"
The point is; no matter if many of you hate Alleva, this is a problem of Wade's making. Not Alleva's
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:43 pm to DBG
No wonder we can’t maintain succeful athletics. Anybody that supports this current administration should be lbanned from all LSU sporting events for life
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:44 pm to Gray Tiger
Once again, the propaganda and partial truths persist.
The NCAA has NEVER said Wade or LSU is under investigation.
There are only PARTIAL snippets of tapes that have been revealed. NO ONE has provided ANY context.
LSU Admins made this sooo much worse. Not saying Wade did, or did not, commit an offense. But, he deserves his day in court.
A FAIR day.
Not some railroad job set up by Alleva and King.
The NCAA has NEVER said Wade or LSU is under investigation.
There are only PARTIAL snippets of tapes that have been revealed. NO ONE has provided ANY context.
LSU Admins made this sooo much worse. Not saying Wade did, or did not, commit an offense. But, he deserves his day in court.
A FAIR day.
Not some railroad job set up by Alleva and King.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:46 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:actually, no.
Because it is true.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:46 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:Wade agreed to meet with his BOSS and his BOSSES BOSS.
Wade refused to meet with his BOSS.
Fact.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:48 pm to Gray Tiger
So let’s get this straight, wade is being called as a witness not a defendant, Correct?
There has been no investigation that shows wade has done anything wrong and you say he has broken rules. No wonder you like Alleva you think like he does.
There has been no investigation that shows wade has done anything wrong and you say he has broken rules. No wonder you like Alleva you think like he does.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:48 pm to Miketheseventh
quote:
No he is not. He is refusing to meet with the NCAA present in the meeting. He was going to meet with them until our compliance department said it would be a good idea if the NCAA would also join the meeting. I’m not sure if you know how the NCAA works. Neither LSU or WW is under investigation right now. In order for an investigation to start the NCAA would:
1st - Send LSU a letter of inquiry
2nd - The NCAA waits for LSU’s response in writing to the specifics of the said allegations of the LOE
3rd - The NCAA then determines if they want to accept LSU’s finding of said allegations pertaining to the LOE
4th - If they are not satisfied with the response from LSU they would then send a letter to LSU notifying them that an investigation will begin in reference to the said allegations.
5th - From that point going forward the investigation continues. It could take a few months or usually it takes over a year for the investigation to wrap up
6th - When the investigation is complete they will determine if punishment is warranted. This usually takes time also.
Just a few references about investigations
Ole Miss football took a couple of years
North Carolina basketball took a couple of years ( and guess what. They found no wrong doing. HAHA)
Now back to your original wrong statement. Why would anyone agree to the NCAA sitting in on a meeting if you are not being OFFICIALLY investigated. Only Joe Aleeva and our compliance department would think this would be a good idea
Solid post.
I wonder how much Gray and Irish get paid to lie for the administration?
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:48 pm to Gray Tiger
You don’t get it gray. I’ve explained the issues with your “argument”.
Go watch murder she wrote
Go watch murder she wrote
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:48 pm to clamdip
Gray...just wanted to let you know I gladly downvoted everyone of your pathetic posts.
See....this is what being a dickhead on the rants entitles you to.
See....this is what being a dickhead on the rants entitles you to.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:54 pm to DBG
quote:
The infraction is the infraction. Don’t help them, make them do the work.
WOW. Then you guys really don't know the history of NCAA rule infractions. Sorry.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:55 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Tell that to Missouri
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:55 pm to Jb1994
Alleva can get fricked.
I will rejoice the day he is removed from LSU.
I will rejoice the day he is removed from LSU.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:57 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Alleva has a track record of overreacting. See Duke Lacrosse
The Missouri reference is gold. Well done
The Missouri reference is gold. Well done
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 8:59 pm
Popular
Back to top


1



