re: alabama (scarbinsky)agrees sec should end guarantee win vs TN

Folks, the real problem is that Bama skipped having UGA this time through the rotation. "One year deal" my butt. There really is no reason for the SEC to not have just inserted Mizzou into the SECW rotation and aTm into the SECE rotation and press on. But no, they had to come up with some silly "return game one-off" schedule that means that LSU will play UGA three times in the regular season since Bama has.

Now, I agree that the division rivals should be gone so that a player can play every team during his career. But that has never happened, so why expect it now? I remember when we played 6 conference games and 5 of them were the same every year. This kind of madness has to stop.

But the real issue for 2013 is that UGA and Kentucky swapped places on Bama's rotation for no reason.

GEAUX TIGERS

quote:

---

But the real issue for 2013 is that UGA and Kentucky swapped places on Bama's rotation for no reason.

---

Come on!

With that change, Alabama plays SEC 1-7 Tennessee and 0-8 Kentucky while LSU plays 7-1 Florida and 7-1 Georgia.

There is your reason, but let's not complain about the major shaft job the SEC office shoved up our arse.

Let Bama and UT play yearly if they want, just dont count it as an SEC game unless its that time in the rotation. Like someone said, catering to certain teams (like SEC does for Bama and Big 12 does for Texas) only hurts the rest of the conference.