- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 5* CB Elias Ricks commits to LSU
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yet it's saying the same thing
Not even close.
0
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:37 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Defense didn’t hold onto the lead at the end of the game
Vs
The defense lost the game
Did the defense lose the lead against all odds? Yes
At this point it's just semantics.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It's kind of important here.
So all of us knowing how many 7OT games there's been in college football is important concerning the discussion of LSU losing the one they played in?
How the frick does the other 4 7OT games factor into the one that we played a month ago?
It doesn't matter if there's been 5 or 50 of those kind of games. The only one that fricking matters is the one that A&M and LSU played last November.
quote:
If OT was so easy, you'd think most would go longer than 2-3 OTs eh?
What the frick does any other schools OT games have to do with the LSU A&M OT game? Jesus jumped up and down.
I know you're not that stupid Roger, but I got to say your post is really really stupid.
You should stop with the "how many 7OT games have been played" and go back to debating about who and how the game was lost.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yet it's saying the same thing, just termed to where it makes more sense to you
It's not even remotely the same thing. It's saying that the defense failed to hole aTm on ONE drive. You've been saying the defense is out fault for the outcome of the ENTIRE game. That's completely different.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
At this point it's just semantics
Only if you can't comprehend the difference in failing to win the game and losing.
LSU failed to win in OTs 1-6. They lost in OT 7. This is basic logic.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:40 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
You've been saying the defense is out fault for the outcome of the ENTIRE game.
You can narrow it down to two plays that the outcome hinged upon.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
the Muffed punt and the missed FG?
Gaining 0 yards on 2nd down with th ball under 2 minutes?
The missed 2 pt conversion?
Or does it seem like more than 2 plays changes this game.
Idk
Gaining 0 yards on 2nd down with th ball under 2 minutes?
The missed 2 pt conversion?
Or does it seem like more than 2 plays changes this game.
Idk
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You can narrow it down to two plays that the outcome hinged upon.
You can and you can also go back through the other 59 minutes and find other times the offense didn't get a first down or dropped a pass, missed a block or an errant throw. What if each punt went 5 more yards? It's a team game.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:42 pm to RB10
quote:
Only if you can't comprehend the difference in failing to win the game and losing.
Absolutely wrong. The defense could not have won the game on the final drive, we had the lead.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:43 pm to RogerTheShrubber
We also had 59 minutes of game time before that to have had a bigger lead.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You can narrow it down to two plays that the outcome hinged upon.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:46 pm to TigerLunatik
I agree. However it hinged on the final drive
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Absolutely wrong. The defense could not have won the game on the final drive, we had the lead.
Wait, so the defense can't win the game, they can only lose it?
Jesus Christ.....
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
However it hinged on the final drive
Simple minds will agree with you.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:48 pm to RB10
You're a retard.
Not remotely what I said
Not remotely what I said
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:50 pm to TigerLunatik
I'm having a flashback. I'm pretty sure Roger is the one who claimed anyone could be as good a pitcher as Greg Maddux. All it would take I'd practice.
Honestly, that clears a lot of this up
Honestly, that clears a lot of this up
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Not remotely what I said
You literally just said it.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:52 pm to RB10
Again you have a second grade comp level.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:52 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You can narrow it down to two plays that the outcome hinged upon.
No. No you can’t.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:52 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
I do agree with Roger that given the way that the 2nd half had gone, it looked highly unlikely that Mond was gonna be able to score. LSU had completely shut them down the entire 2nd half. I never thought in a million years that aTm would have gotten into the endzone
Except it just happened last year, in the ND game. That was also a game in which the head coach, who I'm sure has LSU's best interests at heart, made what we'll call a risk-averse decision, which ended up costing us.
Page 25 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News