
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
When did LSU become championship or bust for this year?
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:02 am
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:02 am
Listening to talking heads, this is their meme.
Geaux Win
Geaux Win
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:05 am to themunch
When LSU paid a giant buyout for CBK and then hired the biggest name in the sport
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:05 am to themunch
quote:
When did LSU become championship or bust for every year?
FIFY
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:06 am to ipodking
And don't forget the $50M NIL roster... so they say.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:06 am to ipodking
Also we have a 40 million dollar roster.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:11 am to TigersBy90
Most were hopeful for the playoffs the first year. The other is not a fair assessment.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:12 am to TigersBy90
Ice seen all kinds of estimates. Average around 42-43. But i know nothing and thats off othe reports. At least 4 or 5 teams spent as much or more
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:14 am to themunch
It hasn't. It never was. If you have common sense.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:14 am to Nado Jenkins83
How many of those have lost like four or five starters in that payroll?
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:28 am to TigersBy90
quote:
Also we have a 40 million dollar roster.
We have that as a budget, which we will spend every year. That doesn’t say anything about what products are for sale when you go shopping. the whole “We spent this much money, so our players should be the best“ is just a huge misunderstanding of what happens each off-season in college football.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:42 am to ipodking
I think getting Seaton was the turning point where expectations went to retarded levels. I think the big names we got distracted people from all the holes we have on offense.
The difference in this team competing for a natty this year vs not was OM beating Georgia in the playoffs last year
The difference in this team competing for a natty this year vs not was OM beating Georgia in the playoffs last year
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:48 am to hall59tiger
Getting Seaton was great. But there were no elite level guards to pair with him to fix the middle. Without that, the line still is middle of the pack at best
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:48 am to themunch
This has been the case since 2003.
Posted on 10/17/26 at 10:49 am to themunch
1) the money (BK's buyout, Lane's salary, money spent on the roster). My counter to that is money doesn't always buy titles though, Indiana wasn't the top spender last year. The Yankees and Dodgers each got swept out of the playoffs against teams with significantly lower payrolls. The roster had a lot of holes last year especially on offense. I don't care what the dollar amount is, it's not my money and there are others that spent around the same of not more. Trying to implement a new system, the QB missing spring, trying to plug up holes in the roster with transfers, that's a tall ask to expect all of that to come together and be the best team in America.
2) Cignetti's Indiana run has warped people's expectations of how fast teams should turn around under new coaches. My counter to that is even Cig's first year, yeah they went 11-2 but they only played 2 ranked teams all year and not only lost but got blown out in both. They were obviously greatly improved from Indiana teams of the past but there was still a noticeable gap between them and true contenders.
If you look at LSU fans expectations in the preseason, the average pick for the final record was around 9-3 and a playoff bubble team. Nobody really expected a natty year 1 despite what talking heads think. The sheer dominance of that Clemson game maybe altered some expectations, people expected to win that game but nobody expected it to be THAT lopsided. That's when people started buying into the hype more, the Ole Miss and Kentucky games were a reality check that Kiffin's program in year 1 isn't a finished product.
2) Cignetti's Indiana run has warped people's expectations of how fast teams should turn around under new coaches. My counter to that is even Cig's first year, yeah they went 11-2 but they only played 2 ranked teams all year and not only lost but got blown out in both. They were obviously greatly improved from Indiana teams of the past but there was still a noticeable gap between them and true contenders.
If you look at LSU fans expectations in the preseason, the average pick for the final record was around 9-3 and a playoff bubble team. Nobody really expected a natty year 1 despite what talking heads think. The sheer dominance of that Clemson game maybe altered some expectations, people expected to win that game but nobody expected it to be THAT lopsided. That's when people started buying into the hype more, the Ole Miss and Kentucky games were a reality check that Kiffin's program in year 1 isn't a finished product.

Popular
Back to top

6











