re: So D’Eriq King is officially in the transfer portal

quote:

---

Is Lamar Jackson NFL MVP taking the Ravens to a Superbowl?
Did the mobile Trevor Lawrence run to victory over LSU last night?
Did Justin Fields at Ohio State run to victory over Clemson?
Did Jalen Hurts at Oklahoma run to victory over LSU?

I've seen all the running QB's I care to see coem through LSU during the Miles area. I'll take an accurate passing QB with a little mobility over running QB's that lack accuracy. D'Eriq King can head anywhere but Baton Rouge. He doesn't fit our system which is PASSING the ball down the field.

---

Talk about insanity!!!! Is Tom Brady taking New England to the Superbowl? Is Drew Brees taking New Orleans to the Superbowl? The above statements illustrate you critical thinking is amiss.

Anyone stating they do not want LSU to recruit dual threat QBs is either a moron or something worse. It is asinine! The best QBs in college football over the last 10 - 15 years have unequivocally been dual threat QBs. And it is not even close. Yet LSU has "fans" who state they prefer LSU not recruit dual threat QBs. I can only imagine what their image of a dual threat QB is that leads them to that moronic conclusion.

This guy is so throwed off he actually publicizes the fact that he wouldn't want Lamar Jackson, Trevor Lawrence (not really), Justin Fields or Jalen Hurts as QBs at LSU. I guess it's true that ignorance is bliss.

I posted somewhere that the only 3 transfer QBs I think could compete with Brennan next year were King, Newman, and Costello. Out of all four QBs (including Brennan), Newman is the one I wanted most. That guy can be coached up and he has the NFL physical tools to have had a crazy year at LSU.

I know people said Brennan ran for 1000 yards in high school, but that doesn't mean anything. Winston ran for over 2000 in high school and after 200 yards as a RSFR, he was just your standard mobile QB. Same with Aaron Murray. He ran for 1200 yards in high school (over 900 as a senior in HS), yet he didn't even have 500 rush yards over a 4 year starting career at UGA.


Honestly I'm team Brennan, but I'd bring in King if he wanted and see if he could compete. If he won the job, it would be all that you needed to know about what the coaches think of him. You guys with the "I don't want him, I don't want him" nonsense are stupid. If he beats out Brennan, then that means Brady and the coaches believes he is best suited to run this offense. You know the offense that just destroyed LSU, SEC, and NCAA records?

People were talking about Fields saying he isn't this, he isn't that, and Fromm is so much better. Well the guy went Ohio St, became the starting QB in a couple months, and put up a 41-3 TD-int ratio averaging 9.3 an attempt, and adding almost 500 yards and 10 TDs on the ground. The run game regressed badly at Ohio St last year when Haskins was the QB. There was barely a threat to run from the QB position giving defenses a much easier ro to key in on the RBs. Fields comes in and Dobbins runs for 2000 and 21 TD and the backup runs for almost 800.

King in his great year played three power 5 teams (and no they didn't have good defenses), but he posted 1100 pass yards 12 TDs and 130 rush yards 4 TDs. In the 10 games he started and finished (meaning not the one he only played for a half before getting injured), he threw 3+ TDs 8/10. He had at least 320 passing in 5/10, and had 3/10 games with over 400 pass yards.


Although on another note, if he goes to Oklahoma and wins the competition, I bet Spencer Rattler leaves and I'd love to pick this guy up to replace Brennan when he leaves.

quote:

---

Do you post under the same screen name on 247? Because you have an imposter if so.

You straight up told me guys that I said were going to go pro early, were not, in fact threats to leave

---

I had 4 guys I thought for sure were gone most people believe are gone (Jefferson, Delpit, CEH, then next up a list of guys who were going to make a decision and could be leaning more towards going then the next list up of guys who would be thinking about it but maybe more on the side of returning. Sorry if whatever I responded to with upset you but I'm sure there was good reasoning behind it, like you saying a bunch of guys for sure going pro and you didnt know that right now, some probably on my make a decision list.


Also - extremely creepy you follow me around on boards.

Then we roll with Peter Parrish or Max Johnson

quote:

---

Nothing you said upset me. Was actually rather flattered that I changed your mind. Just funny to hear you call me stupid after something like that

---

You have still yet to post anything specific about this on here, except what your hazy memory is recalling, link to all this on this board? I know exactly what I said on 247 and repeated here now. I highly doubt it was anything close to parroting what you said as I would never in a million years do that for anything you say. I had 3 specific groups I posted there of guys I thought were long gone, making a decision on one side of fence and making decision on other side of fence (but they could really go either way in the end, you just never know). I sincerely hope you dont think that was me saying "ERRBODY LEAVING" if thats what you said.

No thank you