re: Now that I have an On3 Subscription

Mashburn, Williams and Ramos. The others don’t have eligibility left. So, unless I’m missing something, that’s actually 3

Oops, missed Roy and Clayton. But, that doesn’t mean that they will all retain them since they are awarded year to year

Clearly, you didn’t read the article. I just summarized what he said. I didn’t say he was right.

68 is the start

Seniors likely gone - Emery (I just think after all the crap that has happened during his time, he is gone), Brooks (years of Arkansas and LSU tape), Jenkins (will likely finish with 400 yards and 6 TDs), Ward (think he's done enough to get drafted at worst 5th round), Banks (that dude is gone. Way too many injuries and a wasted non profitable year to put more tear on his body)

Early outs for sure - Ojulari, Boutte,

Possible early outs - Roy (I think he's gone. With the way Wingo has played and Maason coming back, how does he start? His combine will likely put him in the 2nd or 3rd round)

Guys that I believe will be in the transfer portal after spring - Raydarious Jones, Nussmeier (I think Jayden comes back and Walker Howard is the future IMO), at least 3 more in the trenches and at least 1 more DB

So that is 14 setting LSU at 54. That means they can take 31. We likely lose 1-2 in the class right now so I'll say even the we have 25 commits, we likely only keep 23 and then add 1 DL, 4 DB, and 2 "others".

quote:

---

What 4 walk ons are getting a scholarship? Outside of Josh Williams

---

Josh has been on scholarship since 2020

quote:

---

Why would we leave the RB?

---

Because ON3 employs people to write the articles that are being shared on a different site. Quit being cheap fricks and subscribe to a premium board.

It's $1 for an entire year. As an LSU fan, it's the best money I think I've spent all year.

This site is the best money I’ve ever spent. Ever.

Sorry for responding so late, but I thought this was confusing as well. I can only guess, but I think it’s because walk-on scholarships are year to year?
If not, I don’t know what he means. In fact, he might be wrong and missed something.
Regardless, if he’s only off by three let’s say, it’s still pretty tight. But it’s a good problem to have compared to last year.

quote:

---

I rather read it here

---

As would I and I paid the dollar. Much like the Scout and 247 boards, its essentially a slurpfest when things are good, all out catastrophe when bad and borderline good info all boxed up in a mini rant like setting. No thanks

Take that 68 number and factor in 8-10 transfers, you're down to 58-60 players. Add 5 more non seniors leaving early for the NFL, that's down to 53-55, allowing a class+transfers of 30-32 players.