- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Top 10 Recruits that have Stayed (Plus Top 5)
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:02 pm to RATeamWannabe
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:02 pm to RATeamWannabe
quote:
tduecen
good job
but dat avi brah wtf is dat thang???
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:03 pm to tduecen
quote:
2014:
4 of the Top 10 players in State stayed in State with 1 undecided still (1 of Top 5 with 2 to decide)
This confuses me... are there one or two undecided players here?
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:04 pm to tduecen
Then you don't know about Leonard. We aren't just talking about a typical talented running back. This is a huuuuuge get. I seriously don't understand the "underwhelming" sentiment you and others are showing.
It's ridiculously baffling to be honest.
It's ridiculously baffling to be honest.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:07 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
This is a huuuuuge get. I seriously don't understand the "underwhelming" sentiment you and others are showing.
I don't get it either. LF will single handedly take over games. I have no doubt.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:26 pm to BeeFense5
quote:Hyped to be the best ever recruiting class in the state of Louisiana and LSU misses out on several kids from the state and you don't "get" it?
Then you don't know about Leonard. We aren't just talking about a typical talented running back. This is a huuuuuge get. I seriously don't understand the "underwhelming" sentiment you and others are showing.
It's ridiculously baffling to be honest.
Is LF that much better than Gray was coming out of HS (#1 RB/#9 overall prospect)?
Is LF that much better than Savon Huggins coming out of HS? (#1 RB/#5 overall)
Marcus Lattimore (#1 RB/#2 overall)
Cierre Wood (#1RB/#3 overall)
Bryce Brown (#1RB/#2 overall)
Is LF going to single handily change the complexion of the team and is the missing piece? It is always HUGE to grab the #1 player overall in recruiting, how is LF any different that the previous ones?
Now you can just say, "you just don't understand"
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:28 pm to Utah Tiger
quote:
So basically this year is LSU worst haul for top state recruits in the past decade (by # of players in top 5) What we thought was going to be the best recruiting year in history is now the worst in the last decade.
Our talent this year was huge and not that many big talents stay in state for any school.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:32 pm to tduecen
Yes.... LF is that much better than Gray, Huggins, Wood, Brown, and a little better than Lattimore was. Thats as a prospect. Hes different from all those guys because hes NFL ready today. All of those guys werent. LF is an 18 year old in a 25 year old NFL RBs body. And has the speed, vision, speed, physical play, toughness, etc. The best comparison ive seen of LF, besides the AP thing, is that hes a combination of both Gurley and Marshall for UGA. Size, power, tackle breaking ability of Gurley, but also has the speed, vision, balance, and moves of Marshall.
Best prospect in a decade and best RB prospect since AP. Hes a "once in a lifetime" type recruit.
Best prospect in a decade and best RB prospect since AP. Hes a "once in a lifetime" type recruit.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:32 pm to Utah Tiger
quote:If you're a fricking ignoramoos.
worst [recruiting year] in the last decade
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:59 pm to KG5989
quote:Phrase gets overused IMO... They were saying it about the kid who went to Ole Miss last year (I can't spell his name so won't try) and it has been used a few times in recruiting the past few years. That and "this is a kid we can't miss on" or "he is a must get for the class"
Hes a "once in a lifetime" type recruit.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:13 pm to BeeFense5
Ben is joke. No one saying a bad class just the worst in a while with home grown talent in a year when people were saying we would have the best class ever.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:21 pm to tduecen
quote:
Eh I know I will get blasted for this, but while getting the #1 player is nice it is just a ranking. I doubt there is THAT much difference in the #1-#3 RB in the nation recruiting wise.
So, the number 1 recruit in the nation is "just a nice ranking" but we're still supposed to be sad over having the #5 class in the country? You're trying to have it both ways. If LF is no different from the #3 RB then whoever we get to replace Noil and Willis will be just as good as well.
There is no question that LF is a more important recruit than Noil, Willis, and Brown combined. To say otherwise is just dumb. We have tons of wide receiver and defensive talent in this class, and we're severely lacking at RB, and it's just false that it's easier to recruit elite RB talent than the other positions. That's laughable. An elite running back is rare and one elite running back can be a total game changer, MUCH more than the other positions.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:24 pm to Louisiania
quote:
There is no question that LF is a more important recruit than Noil, Willis, and Brown combined
No way in hell. That makes no sense. Hell, Barry Sanders wasn't worth three other elite players.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:31 pm to Louisiania
quote:Yes it is all opinion based actually, so having the #1 player because a few people said he was the #1 player is nice.
So, the number 1 recruit in the nation is "just a nice ranking"
quote:Did I say this no? Thanks for trying to put words on my fingers
but we're still supposed to be sad over having the #5 class in the country?
quote:No that is just dumb in my opinion, 1 player ranked as a 5* vs several ranked 5* gimme the several any day of the week.
There is no question that LF is a more important recruit than Noil, Willis, and Brown combined. To say otherwise is just dumb.
quote:What makes a RB more of a game changer than a stud defensive end, corner back, receiver/returner, etc.
it's just false that it's easier to recruit elite RB talent than the other positions. That's laughable. An elite running back is rare and one elite running back can be a total game changer, MUCH more than the other positions.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:34 pm to tduecen
We could have pulled 4/5 the other day with that one being fournette going somewhere else and this place would have been nuclear.
Pls if you actually have any knowledge of recruiting and have followed the recruitment of fournette you would not be trying to act like him jumping aboard isn't that big of a deal.
Pls if you actually have any knowledge of recruiting and have followed the recruitment of fournette you would not be trying to act like him jumping aboard isn't that big of a deal.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:34 pm to Louisiania
Whew. I am glad we did not land all the great talent. Why am I glad? I do not know but ghe RB gurus seem to think we should not regret the ue chippers that left us so them not coming must be a good thing.
Thanks for the enlightenment.
Thanks for the enlightenment.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:36 pm to BeeFense5
quote:It is either way, I prefer 4/5 with Adams/Garrett.
We could have pulled 4/5 the other day with that one being fournette going somewhere else and this place would have been nuclear.
quote:
Pls if you actually have any knowledge of recruiting
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:37 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
We could have pulled 4/5 the other day with that one being fournette going somewhere else and this place would have been nuclear.
Who gives a frick? I swear you worry more about other posters than you do anything else. More than half your posts are calling someone else out.
LSU will be fine, but missed on a lot of in state talent. They've got a month to regroup and go out of state and make up for it.
It will be a decent class regardless, but let's not pretend there wasn't a lot of talent left on the table here.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
It is ok, he takes any critique or question of staff/players as some sort of personal attack. It has been his thing since he joined, you are not allowed to question the players, staff, program in any form.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:41 pm to tduecen
quote:
It is ok, he takes any critique or question of staff/players as some sort of personal attack
Oh, I'm aware. He calls out everyone, even on the poli board.
It's a mixed bag recruiting cycle so far and no one knows how it will pan out for a couple of years but there is a bit of disappointment, rightly so.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 1:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Mixed bag?
That's my problem with people on here.
Lsu's class is far from a mixed bag.
And I'm also 100% sure that you and tdeucen do not actually follow the recruiting cycle but have jumped on the bandwagon to criticize.
It really does amaze me that we have people shitting on this lsu class.
That's my problem with people on here.
Lsu's class is far from a mixed bag.
And I'm also 100% sure that you and tdeucen do not actually follow the recruiting cycle but have jumped on the bandwagon to criticize.
It really does amaze me that we have people shitting on this lsu class.
Popular
Back to top


0





