- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Feist and Gordon fall to 3-stars on rivals update?
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:55 pm
Wow, the hits just keep on coming
I see none of our commits got bumped up.
Did they give an explanation as to why?

I see none of our commits got bumped up.
Did they give an explanation as to why?
This post was edited on 1/19/12 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:56 pm to thunderbird1100
All the while Alabama gets 3-4 néw 4*
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:59 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
All the while Alabama gets 3-4 néw 4*
Already processed 2 guys (3-stars of course) to get back down to 25

Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:08 pm to thunderbird1100
Rivals is approaching espn on recruiting.
Scout and 247 >>>>>>>>> Rivals
Scout and 247 >>>>>>>>> Rivals
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:09 pm to c on z
This looks intentional, why do they keep downgrading our recruits?
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:09 pm to thunderbird1100
Feist and Gordon aren't going to be as good now that rivals has taken away a star OMG : (
The program is in shambles.
The program is in shambles.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:10 pm to thunderbird1100
fwiw they were both overrated.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:18 pm to thunderbird1100
Didn't say a thing about Gordon.
For Fiest, the hack Perroni said he's a guy without a position because he's only played DE in hs and struggled at UA at LB. Also said he disappeared in the Dome. Basically for no reason.
We had 2 guys drop from the 250 to 3* players on there. Just more reason and evidence in my argument that Rivals is a sham of it's old self. Haven't taken them serious since the funding problems started and people started bolting. Their rankings are 90% based on camps,combines,7 on 7, all star games and politics. The fact that they'll outright deny this and will say that the entire body of work means more is not evident from their actions. If Fiest was a 4* and top 250 player based on his body of work all year but a 3* based on 1 all star week where he was playing LB for the 1st time and actually impressed most people then their explanations of how the rankings work is just a flat out lie. That's just an example of 1 of our commits. There are many more.
Avery Johnson was rightly dropped but the question is why now and not earlier? He had a bad year before now. It is purely based on the all star game but they deny that. He is now ranked 247 after previously being 75. If his true ranking was that different then why wait until the final ranking to drop the kid 172 spots? Their actions don't support their explanation and reasoning.
For Fiest, the hack Perroni said he's a guy without a position because he's only played DE in hs and struggled at UA at LB. Also said he disappeared in the Dome. Basically for no reason.
We had 2 guys drop from the 250 to 3* players on there. Just more reason and evidence in my argument that Rivals is a sham of it's old self. Haven't taken them serious since the funding problems started and people started bolting. Their rankings are 90% based on camps,combines,7 on 7, all star games and politics. The fact that they'll outright deny this and will say that the entire body of work means more is not evident from their actions. If Fiest was a 4* and top 250 player based on his body of work all year but a 3* based on 1 all star week where he was playing LB for the 1st time and actually impressed most people then their explanations of how the rankings work is just a flat out lie. That's just an example of 1 of our commits. There are many more.
Avery Johnson was rightly dropped but the question is why now and not earlier? He had a bad year before now. It is purely based on the all star game but they deny that. He is now ranked 247 after previously being 75. If his true ranking was that different then why wait until the final ranking to drop the kid 172 spots? Their actions don't support their explanation and reasoning.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:20 pm to dj30
Don't care about the stars.....if they lose or gain a star doesn't change the player or what they bring to the table. Consider it a preseason ranking 3 years too early.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:43 pm to jdg91878
quote:
Whatever site(s) has us ranked higher >>>>>>>>> whatever site(s) have us ranked lower
fify
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:51 pm to thunderbird1100
Feist dropping just proves how much a joke rivals is now.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 11:10 pm to deuce985
They can drop them all to 2* for all I care. Same players, we know they're good, and outside of Oxford and Alabama, they don't hang banners for "recruiting national championships".
Heck, maybe other schools would stop trying to take sway our commits if they were ranked lower.
Oh, and frick all teams who wear red.
Heck, maybe other schools would stop trying to take sway our commits if they were ranked lower.
Oh, and frick all teams who wear red.
Posted on 1/20/12 at 12:13 am to thunderbird1100
What difference does it make if the LSU coaching staff wanted them? Ronnie Feist's performance in the Under Armor All Star game was better than several other players who are rated much higher. I was more impressed with Feist in the game than Landon Collins.
Posted on 1/20/12 at 4:48 am to thunderbird1100
These ratings I would bet is used by these teams to close out their recruiting. You can see a recruit who is trying to make up his mind may do so if he thinks he'll be among the best class. The only one in 1st place every year is Bama and texas. Now I see that Duval from Bama is still a 4*. Did he play in any all star games? Skewing the rankings is favor of your favorite team is all Rivals is doing.
Posted on 1/20/12 at 6:24 am to thunderbird1100
who cares , when they play on Saturday I don't any stars next to their name . It's all nonsense anyway .
Posted on 1/20/12 at 6:32 am to Prominentwon
quote:
Feist and Gordon fall to 3-stars on rivals update
quote:
All the while Alabama gets 3-4 néw 4*
Who gives a frick about stars? We know they're studs.
Popular
Back to top
