Started By
Message

re: Water heater - Tank vs Tankless?

Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:30 pm to
Posted by piratedude
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2009
2756 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

You’re playing semantics and trying to be cute.


and you're both being moronic. The term comes from back in the day when buildings used boilers to heat water for heating by circulation through radiators and water for home use, or as they called it "domestic hot water." Later, when the systems were separated, they had heaters to provide the domestic hot water, and called them domestic hot water heaters. When steam heat fell out of use, there was no longer a need to differentiate between the two uses, and we shortened it to "hot water heater."

Your pedantic friend.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86229 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Less gpm with tankless?

There time involved in start up and delivery. It may not be much, but it's a tad slower than a tank holding already hot water. The shortest run in our house is fairly quick, but nothing like a tank.
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
5332 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 4:18 pm to
It takes us about 5-10 seconds for ignition, burn, and temp rise when hot water is demanded, depending on incoming temp. Add that onto the length of the run and it seems like a long time.

Our new tankless is now completely across my house from my kitchen sink, and during the winter it takes about 4 minutes for hot water to reach the sink. I installed a recirc pump under my sink that uses the cold water line as the return. It worked wonderfully until it broke about 6 months later. Was thinking of either going with a 4 gallon expansion tank under the sink, a point of use 120v heater under the sink, or replacing the recirc pump.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 4:20 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94593 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

be sure I understand I need electricity to keep the computer running.. no electricity.. no hot water


I think this is a potential application for a uninterruptible power supply. I would have concerns with one in the attic, as the operating conditions are harsh and that would be a (potentially) flammable battery in such harsh conditions.

But, in the conditioned space, it might make sense.

On the other hand, a backup generator provides power in an outage as well.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23525 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 7:15 am to
Thanks everyone for the suggestions. There were a couple of things about the tankless that I didn't think about or see anywhere else.

I think I'll just go back with a tanked heater.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
90895 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:42 am to
quote:

I think I'll just go back with a tanked heater.


a well implemented gas-fed tankless heater setup is pure magic.

...so is an inexpensive swap out to a brand new 80 gallon tanked heater.

our current house put us back to a tank and its also brand new (installed about 3 months before we bought the house) so there is zero chance we'd try to swap for a tankless...but having said that and having had a well designed tankless at our previous house complete w/ 'smart' recirculation, i can say with 4 family members who are also part duck, it was a Godsend.
This post was edited on 12/20/24 at 9:44 am
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
61750 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 12:53 pm to
Tankless, want to never go back to a tank. I have two kitchens, 4 baths in my house, we never run out of hot water. Plus tankless are way more efficient. If the tank is in the attic, why would you want to stand a chance of a burst of the tank?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram