- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New Roof
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:53 pm
I'm looking at different shingles and debating between CertainTeed Landmark and CertainTeed Belmont options. The color that I want is only offered in the Belmont series but there is an option that's pretty close in the Landmark. Price difference would be ~10k$, including labor. If anyone has any roofing experience, I'd really appreciate an opinion on cost/benefit between the 2 options. Also, if there's a clear difference in aesthetics.
Insurance is w/ State Farm, not sure what the discount would be, but I believe I would get one w/ the Belmont option.
Insurance is w/ State Farm, not sure what the discount would be, but I believe I would get one w/ the Belmont option.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:04 pm to Tigers13
Landmark has a 25 year warranty & Belmont 30 years. I wouldn't spend more money on the 30 year shingles because most insurance companies won't write a policy if your roof is over 15 years old.
For roofs 15–20 years old, State Farm may only pay the Actual Cash Value (replacement cost minus depreciation) rather than the full cost to replace.
For roofs 15–20 years old, State Farm may only pay the Actual Cash Value (replacement cost minus depreciation) rather than the full cost to replace.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:31 pm to Tigers13
quote:
CertainTeed Landmark and CertainTeed Belmon
I'm going to refrain from talking about how much I dislike CT shingles shingles but just know that I do
quote:
Price difference would be ~10k$, including labor. If anyone has any roofing experience, I'd really appreciate an opinion on cost/benefit between the 2 options
The Belmont is a class 4 impact resistant and a pretty tough shingle. The CT Landmark is imo, one of the two worst architectural shingles on the market so the jump from CT class 3 to class 4 is a pretty big jump in quality. In other manufacturers it's not quite as big of a jump because their class 3's are so much better. Though a 10K price difference is extreme. The Belmont is kind of a luxury shingle so you're paying extra for the look as well.. The product will be better no doubt, but is the look 10K important to you? Is this your forever home? If you don't plan on being there a long time I'd have a hard time justifying the cost.
quote:
Insurance is w/ State Farm, not sure what the discount would be, but I believe I would get one w/ the Belmont option.
A class 3 will get you a 10% discount on your premiums with State Farm and a class 4 will get you 15-20% discount.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:50 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
one of the two worst architectural shingles on the market
Whats #2?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:56 pm to Polar Pop
quote:
Whats #2?
I think CT and IKO are fighting for the bottom in the standard architectural. CT has some decent higher end shingles, you just don't see them as much because like the OP, they're normally thousands more and people normally don't go for that.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:26 pm to Tigers13
I need a new roof myself and have been pondering on this recently. I am not sure I believe there is much difference in the quality of any shingle versus another. Basically, the only time insurance comes into play is when a storm takes place.
In my experience, unless you have a storm, basically any shingle will last 20 years.
In my experience, unless you have a storm, basically any shingle will last 20 years.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:25 pm to weadjust
quote:
most insurance companies won't write a policy if your roof is over 15 years old.
Even if it's heavy gauge R panel
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:01 pm to weadjust
quote:
For roofs 15–20 years old, State Farm may only pay the Actual Cash Value (replacement cost minus depreciation) rather than the full cost to replace.
I’ve yet to see SF write an ACV policy.
Popular
Back to top
3







