Started By
Message

re: Admins.....DEAL WITH THIS CRAP!!....Zach has done lost his mind on the PoliBoard

Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:01 pm to
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165198 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

The inability of you people to comprehend the written word is truly amazing.

I never defended Sandusky. Your thinking goes like this:

Topic: Coach rapes 12 year old in shower.

Zach: Odd that the child didn't tell his parents.

You: Well, that means you are for child rape.

Sandusky is a gay sexual predator. He set up a situation to increase his chances of finding a victim. Same thing happens with some Boy Scout leaders. If you're a wolf you'd love a job as night watchman at the Hen House.
I knew one gay guy who created the Shreveport Boys Choir years ago. If there were 50 boys in it he knew at least 1 or 2 would be gay.

But gays are a protected class in the media. That's why they are called 'molesters' 'pedophiles' or 'child abusers' instead of being called gay.

How is this defending Sandusky?

Too bad you're such a pussy. The thread could have been very interesting.


No the entire thread was you completely ignoring the fact that you were wrong about everything

You claimed all were post pubescent. None of them were. This was proven to you.

You claimed they were willing. At least some of them weren't. This was in the report and proven to you.

You claimed that pedophilia isn't 13 and under. You were wrong about that.

You were literally wrong about everything you posted in the thread and you were beaten over the head with sources to cite those facts.

On the age range issues you weren't even close.

You are just too much of a spineless fricking count to admit that you are wrong ever. You have no place on the board.
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14642 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:02 pm to
Yeah, I can understand that - I don't agree with Zach's take on it - but I do agree with him that it's stupid for that thread to be whacked. Oh well - it's not the first time that people call for censorship over things they don't agree with, and it won't be the last time.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165198 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:03 pm to
quote:



I don't really care. I'm never in favor of banning posters for any reason. I guess I'm still wondering what point you were trying to make.


He was trying to be the guy with the unique different angle

Unfortunately for him, he didn't get his facts lined up and was literally wrong about every easily refutable claim in the thread. Even after he was proven wrong by me and a host of others beyond any reasonable doubt, he still clung to his stupidity.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165198 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I can understand that - I don't agree with Zach's take on it - but I do agree with him that it's stupid for that thread to be whacked. Oh well - it's not the first time that people call for censorship over things they don't agree with, and it won't be the last time.


I don't think anyone called for it to be whacked

I was hoping it would stay there so everyone could see what a fricking stupid lunatic Zach is.
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14642 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately for him, he didn't get his facts lined up and was literally wrong about every easily refutable claim in the thread. Even after he was proven wrong by me and a host of others beyond any reasonable doubt, he still clung to his stupidity.
Well in this case, yeah it would be a bad thread. Too bad I didn't get to read it.

I still tend to wonder why the boys didn't do more about it. That's the only interesting part of Zach's point, from what I can guess.
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14642 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I was hoping it would stay there so everyone could see what a fricking stupid lunatic Zach is.
He'll be back soon with more stories from the gym, I'm sure
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160200 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:08 pm to
Scared that no one would believe them, worried that they'd lose all the cool shite they were getting, probably embarrassed, etc. Those boys were fricked up for life by Sandusky. They were not and probably aren't completely rational to this day.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
115666 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

I don't really care. I'm never in favor of banning posters for any reason. I guess I'm still wondering what point you were trying to make.

Honest question and I shall give you an honest response.
The OP was about Rush saying he could not say what he thought because he would be banned from radio. He said nothing else.
I guessed it. I was right. The issue of Consent would have gotten him hell.

This board has proven me right. Posters called for my banning instead of logical discourse.
Chicken, in his wisdom, realized that none of my posts justified what Sandusky did.

The issue of consent in the Sandusky case is interesting but it is banned on this board.

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
115666 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

You have no place on the board.

Then tell Chicken that I should be banned and I shall be gone forever.
Or tell him that we can debate the issue on the poli board.
Your choice.
Why are you people so afraid of discourse? You keep calling for banning and censorship. It's very sad.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165198 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Why are you people so afraid of discourse? You keep calling for banning and censorship. It's very sad.


I didn't call for you to be banned

I said you have no place here. If you wish to stick around and embarrass yourself be my guest

I started a thread about yesterday's thread on the poli board. Feel free to defend your idiocy there.

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

The issue of Consent would have gotten him hell.

Don't put that shite on even being in Rush's head.

There is NO ISSUE OF CONSENT for a sub-13 year old having sex with an old man, gay or not.

You should still be banned for CONTINUALLY asserting that perhaps these boys might have consented.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
107489 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:25 pm to
Yeah, I've never been a big fan of admins protecting people's reputations from their own stupidity.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:26 pm to
I suspect the ONLY thing Rush worried about talking about was the fact the press is avoiding the gay aspect of the story.

I can pretty much guarantee you that Rush wasn't thinking that perhaps sub-13 year old boys consented and that even if they had, it would be relevant.

THAT shite is all on you.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 2:15 pm to
I'm not afraid to talk about anything, and I'm not a fan of whacking threads because others don't like it, but I'm assuming you don't like the gays, and though I did not read the original thread,

you believe that "pederast" and "gay" are synonymous, which is even dumber than someone claiming they invented the word "diddle"
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
115666 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

I didn't call for you to be banned I said you have no place here

You just contradicted yourself.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
75037 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

The way you are trivializing and minimizing child sexual abuse makes it seem like you are trying to justify something.


Completely and utterly fricked up to insinuate someone is a child molester because of a point of view.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165198 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 6:09 pm to
quote:



Completely and utterly fricked up to insinuate someone is a child molester because of a point of view.



No one is doing that

It's also completely fricked up to flat out assert that victims of child rape were all willing participants with no proof but that didn't stop Zach.

Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:28 pm to
yeah, it is fricked up


but all opinions, no matter how stupid, should be welcome
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram