Started By
Message

re: Lipitor side effects

Posted on 8/16/18 at 7:00 pm to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125410 posts
Posted on 8/16/18 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

a restricted diet


what do you mean restricted

have you tried Keto, vegan or anything else to cut out all the processed crap
Posted by Rust Cohle
Baton rouge
Member since Mar 2014
1944 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 6:23 am to
This is going to be all over the news. Another questioner study, anti meat, pro carb.

LINK
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 6:25 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125410 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Heart disease is caused by ingested carbohydrate. That's it. (see edit below) Prior, to, say, 1910, CVD essentially didn't show up in the entire medical history of humanity. It was invented by us when sugar consumption went from x to 150x in 150 years.



Not at carbs are the same and you know that

And humans have been consuming carbs to a long long time

Eating whole foods(grass fed beef, good fats,natural chicken and vegetables) , and whole grains isn’t bad for you

It’s all about the right balance and cutting out the processed crap.
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 8:17 am
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Not at carbs are the same and you know that
I mostly disagree. Yes, some carbs do have the benefit of being delivered alongside some valuable micronutrients (vs, say, literal candy). However, that doesn't mean it's necessarily worth eating them. It's also the case that carbs crowd out micronutrients, essentially requiring them to be ingested in vastly greater quantity than if carbs were not present. In a no/low-carb environment, just trace amounts of some micronutrients are ample.

quote:

And humans have been consuming carbs to a long long time
Yes and no. I don't consider the ~10K years since the ag revolution to be a "long long time "in terms of the human body's evolution. In any event, "some" carbs would still be but a mere fraction of what modern day humans are being scolded to eat.

quote:


Eating whole foods(grass fed beef, good fats,natural chicken and vegetables) , and whole grains isn’t bad for you
One of those doesn't belong. It is my belief (and I think amply supported) that consumption of ANY grains is not good for you. That doesn't mean there aren't some micronutrients. That doesn't mean you'll drop dead if you eat some. It just means that - purely from the standpoint of health (which I always define as "disease-free longevity) - they do not serve any long-term positive end.

quote:


It’s all about the right balance and cutting out the processed crap.


"Balanced diet" and "varied diet" are two tropes not supported by the evidence.

I obviously agree on the processed crap.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Yes and no. I don't consider the ~10K years since the ag revolution to be a "long long time "in terms of the human body's evolution.


But you continually cite the last 100 years for heart disease. Selection and confirmation bias, no?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125410 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

I mostly disagree. Yes, some carbs do have the benefit of being delivered alongside some valuable micronutrients (vs, say, literal candy). However, that doesn't mean it's necessarily worth eating them. It's also the case that carbs crowd out micronutrients, essentially requiring them to be ingested in vastly greater quantity than if carbs were not present. In a no/low-carb environment, just trace amounts of some micronutrients are ample


Getting your carbs from vegetables, bananas and other natural sources is not bad for you and contains those beneficial micronutrients.
quote:

Yes and no. I don't consider the ~10K years since the ag revolution to be a "long long time "in terms of the human body's evolution. In any event, "some" carbs would still be but a mere fraction of what modern day humans are being scolded to eat.
and cavemen were also pretty dumb, the broadening of the human diet has helped with human brain development to an extent with the physiological changes to the human body.
quote:

One of those doesn't belong. It is my belief (and I think amply supported) that consumption of ANY grains is not good for you. That doesn't mean there aren't some micronutrients. That doesn't mean you'll drop dead if you eat some. It just means that - purely from the standpoint of health (which I always define as "disease-free longevity) - they do not serve any long-term positive end.
eating whole grains isn’t bad for you. Processed white grain is. Now the argument can be made that they are not needed in the human diet esp on large scales but whole grain isn’t bad for you.
quote:

Balanced diet" and "varied diet" are two tropes not supported by the evidence.

yea keep thinking that

Balance doesn’t mean all your macros break down has to be equal
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 12:11 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 1:55 pm to
quote:


But you continually cite the last 100 years for heart disease. Selection and confirmation bias, no?
What? I don't think you understand what you are saying.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Getting your carbs from vegetables, bananas and other natural sources is not bad for you and contains those beneficial micronutrients.
Bananas have way too much sugar and are a terrible way to get the micronutrients some of them have.

quote:

and cavemen were also pretty dumb, the broadening of the human diet has helped with human brain development to an extent with the physiological changes to the human body.


This does not make sense.

quote:

eating whole grains isn’t bad for you. Processed white grain is. Now the argument can be made that they are not needed in the human diet esp on large scales but whole grain isn’t bad for you.


They are bad for you.

quote:

yea keep thinking that


What evidence is there of a physiological requirement for a "balanced diet"?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram