Or is that another game that is basically gonna be dead before early access ends? It had so much hype on release, and it seems like not much has changed since. The steam review are steadily dropping.

This whole genre seems like a Neverending cycle of hype and then death by 1,000 cuts because devs promise more than they can deliver.

I think the only reason valheim is successful is because they didn't go for ultra realistic graphics and all the headaches that come with it, opting for more of a Minecraft approach.

5 ...

Report Post

Posted by geauxtigers87

Louisiana

Member since Mar 2011

26916 posts

Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:52 pm to Corinthians420

havent played it in a while. shame too because it had potential

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Josh Fenderman

Ron Don Volante's PlayPen

Member since Jul 2011

6994 posts

Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:26 pm to Corinthians420

quote:
think the only reason valheim is successful is because they didn't go for ultra realistic graphics and all the headaches that come with it, opting for more of a Minecraft approach

Apart from it being a lot of fun and the devs actually giving it attention.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerMyth36

River Ridge

Member since Nov 2005

41025 posts

Posted on 12/11/24 at 9:36 pm to Corinthians420

I enjoyed it when I played it. I thought maybe some larger areas should have the mist cleared as you progressed. It is early access. Why should it still have huge numbers. It isn't an open ended game. I played for about 40 hours and packed it up until it is finally released. Why get burned out on a game before it hits 1.0? They certainly have a good system in place, they just need to finish it off.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by skrayper

21-0 Asterisk Drive

Member since Nov 2012

34406 posts

Posted on 12/13/24 at 9:18 am to Corinthians420

My friends and I were playing for a good while. Kind of hit a point where we didn't feel like the content was terribly "new" anymore and got burned out.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Pendulum