Started By
Message

re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts

Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54653 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:37 pm to
Josh, if I'm now wanting an upgraded monitor, what should I lean towards? I know we talked upping to 1440p based on that prior build. Not sure how high a refresh rate.

Also does anyone here have thoughts on curved monitors?

Build link LINK

ETA: I just realized you all were already discussing monitors
This post was edited on 12/26/24 at 4:39 pm
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:40 pm to
I would recommend going with OLED for a new monitor. I also highly recommend going with an ultrawide monitor. You can jump into a relatively cheap ultrawide oled experience with this:

Alienware 34" ultrawide

If you have more money to spend and want something bigger, I would look into the LG 45" ultragear option. I have seen it in person and it's very impressive.
This post was edited on 12/26/24 at 4:42 pm
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54653 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:42 pm to
Excellent. Thanks.

Fwiw this is my current monitor LINK
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54653 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:45 pm to
Those monitors are nuts compared to what I have
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:47 pm to
Just be aware if you go with an OLED, the best conditions for gaming with OLED is in a dark environment with no light or light behind the display. The two weaknesses of OLEDs are the burn in potential (can be mitigated with proper use and maintenance) and not as bright as other panel types.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54653 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:48 pm to
Gotcha. Is there that big of a jump from the $300 range to a $650 monitor?
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Gotcha. Is there that big of a jump from the $300 range to a $650 monitor?



Yea. There are cheaper oled monitors available, but they won't be ultrawide. and would be in the 27" size.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54653 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 4:58 pm to
Thank you sir
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
11532 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
11532 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:17 pm to
FSR4 and RDNA4 later this quarter...
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

FSR4 and RDNA4 later this quarter...


They are probably waiting to see what Nvidia's 50 series is priced at and what the performance looks like per sku before releasing. Which is honestly embarrassing. They claimed they were shifting strategies and were going after market share. If they are trying to price their highest end card slightly cheaper than its 50 series counter part, then they will continue to be annihilated. If they want market share they are going to have to take a haircut on their margins because their product can't compete straight up with Nvidia.
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
11532 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:34 pm to
Most people are willing to pay an extra 20% or more for Nvidia, so ya. Although, Nvidia is supposedly just announcing the 5080.
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Most people are willing to pay an extra 20% or more for Nvidia, so ya. Although, Nvidia is supposedly just announcing the 5080.


If the rumors are true. The 9070 XT will be around 4070ti super to 4080 super levels of performance.

If they price it anything above $500 I don't think they can be considered serious in trying to acquire market share.
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
11532 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:42 pm to
Last "leak" I saw was 5% better than 4070ti. That would've been OK at the right price.
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:45 pm to
Wow and they didn't even announce their GPUs lmao
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
11532 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:47 pm to
Leather jacket man gonna go in dry in a little over 4 hours. And when I say that, I mean our wallets.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 1:55 pm
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:55 pm to
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69383 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 5:57 pm to
Intel needs to accept one of the buyout offers. My God the 2XX series is so bad with no improvement from the 1XX series they've completely stalled again.

CPU market is just a total bloodbath now.



quote:

Compared to the competition's latest Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D offers up to 64% faster performance and 20% improvement on average, with several games delivering over 20-30% uplifts.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 6:00 pm
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:25 pm to


If this is actually legit it fully explains why AMD didn’t want to present anything today
Posted by bamabenny
Member since Nov 2009
15739 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:45 pm to
There is absolutely no way that’s legit
first pageprev pagePage 1899 of 1912Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram