- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 3:41 pm to LSU Coyote
Posted on 2/15/20 at 3:41 pm to LSU Coyote
Gotcha..
On another note, I have an Acer monitor that I'm using for my xbox currently. 75 hz.
Would that be good enough?
On another note, I have an Acer monitor that I'm using for my xbox currently. 75 hz.
Would that be good enough?
1
Posted on 2/15/20 at 5:41 pm to Devious
quote:
Framerate over 60 doesn't matter until high level competitive gaming.
Meaning your 144hz doesn't amount to shite playing fortnite against the general gaming community.
High as frick. I wouldn’t spend $1000 to get the same experience as a console 10 years ago. Y’all need to get with the times and stop using 60fps as a bench. 144hz at 1080p can be done with a tin can nowadays.
Posted on 2/15/20 at 5:43 pm to RouxDog91
75hz is decent and fine to start off. I’d use that until you can get a good monitor 144hz at either 1080p or 1440p.
I started off on an Asus 75hz
I started off on an Asus 75hz
This post was edited on 2/15/20 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 2/15/20 at 5:43 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
Yeah we've moved past 1080p/60 years ago even just for benchmarking.
High refresh rate or go home these days.
We're getting a frick ton of 4K/144Hz monitors this year.
High refresh rate or go home these days.
We're getting a frick ton of 4K/144Hz monitors this year.
This post was edited on 2/15/20 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 2/15/20 at 5:47 pm to UltimateHog
What do you think the min specs are to run 4K/144?
I’d imagine people who want 4K want great picture but can anything right now run 4K at full graphics at 144?
I’d imagine people who want 4K want great picture but can anything right now run 4K at full graphics at 144?
Posted on 2/15/20 at 5:50 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
I’d imagine people who want 4K want great picture but can anything right now run 4K at full graphics at 144?
Nope
My 2080Ti under water struggles to get me 70in most games when everything is turned up.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 3:08 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
What do you think the min specs are to run 4K/144?
I’d imagine people who want 4K want great picture but can anything right now run 4K at full graphics at 144?
When they launch? Yes, AMD and Nvidia's offerings for this year will be out months beforehand. I would imagine someone like LG would even try to stagger a release around the new GPU's but mini-LED tech is cutting edge so I don't think they can speed up on their Q4 release.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 4:02 am to UltimateHog
The new GPUs will still struggle to hit that with everything turned up.
Edt: idt he was asking about display tech but processing power.
Edt2: another note, this is the first gen I haven't ran SLi (usually TITANS) since Fermi (5xx 2011). Soo I can't speak to the current support with SLi drivers but it was dropping off relative to previous years. However, we also didn't need SLi/Cfx to max out titles like previous years. Processing power sort of caught up with display tech, but going into this year that pendulum might be swinging back in the other direction.
Edt: idt he was asking about display tech but processing power.
Edt2: another note, this is the first gen I haven't ran SLi (usually TITANS) since Fermi (5xx 2011). Soo I can't speak to the current support with SLi drivers but it was dropping off relative to previous years. However, we also didn't need SLi/Cfx to max out titles like previous years. Processing power sort of caught up with display tech, but going into this year that pendulum might be swinging back in the other direction.
This post was edited on 2/16/20 at 4:12 am
Posted on 2/16/20 at 8:47 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:I simply said 60 fps was the min I would target if building. And consoles were not hitting 1080p/60fps 10 years ago.
I wouldn’t spend $1000 to get the same experience as a console 10 years ago. Y’all need to get with the times and stop using 60fps as a bench. 144hz at 1080p can be done with a tin can nowadays.
If anyone is high as frick...
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:14 am to Devious
Xbox one came out 7 years ago and mine gets 60 so yeah
144 should be the min for building. Hell the new consoles are going to reach for 120.
144 should be the min for building. Hell the new consoles are going to reach for 120.
This post was edited on 2/16/20 at 10:19 am
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:17 am to UltimateHog
quote:
AMD and Nvidia's offerings for this year will be out months beforehand.
You think they can jump up like 70-80 FPS? I can see esports style gaming getting up there.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:26 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:It does not get 60 fps on every game. Let's cut the crap.
Xbox one came out 7 years ago and mine gets 60 so yeah
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:43 am to Devious
It’s an almost 10 year old console. It’s 2020 man, PCs get way better than that now. All I was saying is don’t target 60 anymore especially at $1000. $400-500 build can get 60 easily with likely getting over 100.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 10:46 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
Why are you struggling so much with comprehension?
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:51 pm to Devious
Why aren’t you? STOP BENCHMARKING WITH 60/1080p
Did you get that?
Did you get that?
This post was edited on 2/16/20 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 2/16/20 at 1:30 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
Yes.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 1:37 pm to UltimateHog
A lot of confusion in here.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 1:46 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
You clearly didn't understand what I said. So I'll repeat yet again.
For me, I would not target anything under 60 fps.
For a grand, he could easily build a 1080p/60fps system.
It's that simple. I never once said that's what he should aim for. Simply said it is easily doable.
Comprende?
For me, I would not target anything under 60 fps.
For a grand, he could easily build a 1080p/60fps system.
It's that simple. I never once said that's what he should aim for. Simply said it is easily doable.
Comprende?
Posted on 2/16/20 at 2:45 pm to Devious
I hope this doesn't confuse anyone but, resolution alone doesn't reflect effort from processing power alone.
In 2012 we all games @ 1440. A lot of 1440/90fps monitors too. We thought 4K/120 would be standard 2yrs later, well here we are..
As graphics engines become more complex, it takes more effort. Resolution alone isn't a great measuring stick.
How this convo even got to that point was goofy, and noobish.
In 2012 we all games @ 1440. A lot of 1440/90fps monitors too. We thought 4K/120 would be standard 2yrs later, well here we are..
As graphics engines become more complex, it takes more effort. Resolution alone isn't a great measuring stick.
How this convo even got to that point was goofy, and noobish.
Posted on 2/16/20 at 2:51 pm to Devious
Incredible.
Page 1652 of 1912
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News