- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:28 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:28 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
I’m currently running on a FX 8320/HD 7870 w/ 8gb of 1866 RAM.
This was the top of the line when I got into PC gaming. That's 98/99 money.
This post was edited on 7/7/19 at 8:29 pm
0
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:28 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
So apparently there is a bug in the new X570 motherboards causing poor OCing.
Just another reason to go with a 450 board instead.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:30 pm to Korin
Ok that seems to work. This controller is very old. Maybe now I can install my old Mortal Kombat 3 cd.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:32 pm to Brosef Stalin
My Dual Shock 2 with a USB adapter works.
Windows 95?
I got my boy Mortal Kombat 1 for PC back in the day for his birthday and it was still DOS and on floppy disks.
quote:
Maybe now I can install my old Mortal Kombat 3 cd.
Windows 95?
I got my boy Mortal Kombat 1 for PC back in the day for his birthday and it was still DOS and on floppy disks.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:32 pm to Korin
It's an AGESA code issue so it is probably in all of them until they update the code.
This will greatly alter the early benchmarking as well. They are only hitting 4.3-4.4 all core instead of the 4.6-4.7.
quote:
It seemed strange to me, so I first decided to write to my contact with GIGABYTE USA (Matthew Hurwitz, I thank him for all the time he has put in to find a solution) and showed him the WHEA (PCI Express) errors, as well as the rare behavior of the 3900X boost frequencies.
Midnight (Wednesday) GBT HQ gives us news and according to their tests, the new AGESA code, including NPRP BIOS (BIOS for press) replicated our results in single-core frequencies, BUT, the original BIOS (AGESA 1002, without code introduced NPRP) turbo boost was working well.
With this information, I decided to flash BIOS, the first BIOS released for the X570 AORUS MASTER board and surprise, the boost frequencies were working as they should, even beyond the processor at 4.65 GHz.
This will greatly alter the early benchmarking as well. They are only hitting 4.3-4.4 all core instead of the 4.6-4.7.
This post was edited on 7/7/19 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 7/7/19 at 8:52 pm to Korin
I think its from Win95. I still have MK3 and Duke Nuke Em cds that I kinda want to play.
Posted on 7/7/19 at 11:35 pm to Brosef Stalin
Also just want to say that it is pretty misleading garbage for Anandtech to use the pre-security patch numbers for Intel vs Ryzen 3. Intel lost about 15% across the board (5-7ish in gaming) from those security flaws.
Wonder why they would do that and hide it way way hidden in fine print?
Wonder why they would do that and hide it way way hidden in fine print?
This post was edited on 7/7/19 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:55 am to UltimateHog
I always love these little outlier benchmark games like this one:
Posted on 7/8/19 at 1:12 am to UltimateHog
I saw that exact one today. I’ve Ben trying to find out if I’ve screwed myself today and it appears that I haven’t... yet.Posted on 7/8/19 at 9:28 am to finchmeister08
I wonder why no one's reviewed the 3800X yet?
There's also a 3400G with Vega 11 APU.
There's also a 3400G with Vega 11 APU.
Posted on 7/8/19 at 9:43 am to finchmeister08
quote:
I saw that exact one today. I’ve Ben trying to find out if I’ve screwed myself today and it appears that I haven’t... yet.
Why would you think you "screwed" yourself? The 5700 XT is dead even with the 2070 Super at 1080p/medium (since you're getting a 144hz monitor) for $100 less.
Posted on 7/8/19 at 9:54 am to Korin
You're paying $100 less for 9% less performance. Value wise, the 5700 XT is what you wanted since it's a better value card
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 9:56 am
Posted on 7/8/19 at 10:06 am to Korin
quote:
The 5700 XT is dead even with the 2070 Super at 1080p/medium (since you're getting a 144hz monitor) for $100 less.
Eh... Technically the 5700XT is slower than the 2070 Super, although within 10%.
EDIT: Blue's post covers it.
I'm also considering a 5700 XT because I have a 1080p 144Hz MSI monitor with Freesync.
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 10:07 am
Posted on 7/8/19 at 10:36 am to Korin
3800x apparently doesn't release until the 12th is what little information I can find.
Posted on 7/8/19 at 10:52 am to boXerrumble
Nevermind, I was looking at the regular 2070.
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 10:54 am
Posted on 7/8/19 at 10:53 am to Greace
quote:
3800x apparently doesn't release until the 12th is what little information I can find.
Newegg had it but it's out of stock now.
The 3400G still uses Zen + so I guess no one cares about that one.
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 10:55 am
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:27 pm to bluebarracuda
Remember, that relative performance is not seen in gaming. 5700XT is actually more powerful.
This post was edited on 7/8/19 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:29 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Remember, that relative performance is not seen in gaming
What? Their relative performance is taken directly from their gaming benches
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:30 pm to bluebarracuda
Have you not paid any attention to what we've posted yesterday?
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:47 pm to UltimateHog
Not really I rarely check TD on weekends and if I do, I don't go back pages to read stuff
I rarely check TD on weekends and if I do, I don't go back pages to read stuff 
Page 1567 of 1886
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News