- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DICE may have saved me $60
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:09 am to finchmeister08
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:09 am to finchmeister08
Come on, finch. Get your head out of your arse and catch up.
1
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:17 am to LewDawg
it didn't seem that bad to me. i enjoyed it. still do actually.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:22 am to finchmeister08
Not sure if this has been answered, but are they capping it at 30fps, or is it only capable of that?
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:29 am to finchmeister08
ps3
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:30 am to sicboy
quote:
Not sure if this has been answered, but are they capping it at 30fps, or is it only capable of that?
I'm going to assume it isn't capable of 60 with the current level of graphics so to answer your question...both
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:35 am to taylork37
The game should still look pretty good, right? I mean, I never expected the console version to come close to the PC version, looks wise.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:36 am to taylork37
quote:
I'm going to assume it isn't capable of 60 with the current level of graphics
Meaning what 360 and PS3 are capable of??
Considering the scale of the game, I wonder if this is just a conscious decision to scale back to make sure the game doesn't have any hiccups, and it's mainly because of the limitations the consoles.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:46 am to The Sad Banana
quote:
The game should still look pretty good, right? I mean, I never expected the console version to come close to the PC version, looks wise.
Yeah it will look good. Probably be one of the best looking multiplat games out there.
Most games are 30 FPS and 720p. So that shouldn't be something that scares anyone away.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:50 am to taylork37
I think with the fact that people are expecting BF3 to really challenge MW3 for FPS supremacy, any news like this is chum for the sharks. Especially COD fanbois (Anti).
<=====deuces wild..............until I post again
<=====deuces wild..............until I post again
This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 9:51 am
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:50 am to sicboy
Well all these factors are intertwined.
The bigger the scale or the higher the detail, the more processing power that will be required. Since BFS is bigger in scale and detail, there is less power that can be used to make it a 60 FPS 1080 game.
COD has less detail and scale so more power can be devoted to resolution and framerate.
The bigger the scale or the higher the detail, the more processing power that will be required. Since BFS is bigger in scale and detail, there is less power that can be used to make it a 60 FPS 1080 game.
COD has less detail and scale so more power can be devoted to resolution and framerate.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:52 am to taylork37
But CoD is still a very pretty, polished product.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:52 am to sicboy
i'd have to agree. since it's gonna be 30 fps and 1080p, people won't like it cause it won't be as smooth. i'm predicting a medal of honor type of feel to it. and we all know how that game turned out. i don't know why i'm bitching though. cod is 720p on the ps3. but at least it's still 60fps.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:54 am to sicboy
quote:
I think with the fact that people are expecting BF3 to really challenge MW3 for FPS supremacy, any news like this is chum for the sharks. Especially COD fanbois (Anti).
They will be 2 totally different style games though.
Either way, using the resolution and frame rate to determine quality is just dumb.
COD is a smaller scale faster paced game that would probabaly be unplayable at 30 FPS....BF3 won't be.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:54 am to finchmeister08
Considering BLOPS was 1080p, I think it could have looked a lot better
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:55 am to The Sad Banana
quote:
But CoD is still a very pretty, polished product.
Graphically yes. But remember they have been using the same exact engine for quite a while.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:56 am to taylork37
I'm with you. I think with the demo we saw on Fallon and everything else we've seen over the last couple of months, we will still get a legit game.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:57 am to finchmeister08
quote:
i'd have to agree. since it's gonna be 30 fps and 1080p, people won't like it cause it won't be as smooth. i'm predicting a medal of honor type of feel to it. and we all know how that game turned out. i don't know why i'm bitching though. cod is 720p on the ps3. but at least it's still 60fps.
Again most games are 30 FPS. And MOH wasn't bad because of low frame-rate.
Resolution is even a bigger moot point IMO. There are plenty of games on 360 and PS3 that are 540p. 720 will be fine.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 10:00 am to sicboy
it's 720p on the ps3
Posted on 6/20/11 at 10:01 am to taylork37
Agreed on MoH.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 10:04 am to taylork37
quote:Most logical statement in this thread.
using the resolution and frame rate to determine quality is just dumb.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News