- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/8/12 at 7:23 pm to sgallo3
This post was edited on 4/8/12 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 4/8/12 at 7:55 pm to peaster68
All Hail, King of the Losers.
Always loved that taunt as I'm slowly destroying my enemy into an oblivion.
Always loved that taunt as I'm slowly destroying my enemy into an oblivion.
Posted on 4/8/12 at 8:30 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Army of elephants like that was pretty much unstoppable. We'd do situations like that and even with two people vs someone with the Persians it's near impossible to win unless you're extremely strategic about it
Saracens with Mameluke's or Go Goth with the INSANELY CHEAP and FAST PRODUCING barracks units (halbs). Persians were over feared and easily countered by units that cost a tenth of what the elephants themselves cost.
Posted on 4/8/12 at 9:15 pm to dcrews
british longbowmen were legit
Posted on 4/8/12 at 9:25 pm to sgallo3
Longbowmen were sweet..
Goths were awesome, but only in like the first 5 mins. No long term viability, only good if you're trying just bumrush someone out of a game
Goths were awesome, but only in like the first 5 mins. No long term viability, only good if you're trying just bumrush someone out of a game
Posted on 4/8/12 at 9:44 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Longbowmen were sweet..
Goths were awesome, but only in like the first 5 mins. No long term viability, only good if you're trying just bumrush someone out of a game
Then you weren't using them right ;)
Longbowmen were the shite.
In DM games, I was always a fan of playing Korea/Mongols/Celts and massing scorpions and onagers. If you could micro decently, you were pretty formidable.
Posted on 4/8/12 at 10:27 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
Me and four other friends would all bring our computers to one persons house and have huge arse battles.
Next to all night Super Smash Brothers marathons, and filming Hollis, this is one of my fondest memories from Childhood.
Posted on 4/9/12 at 7:07 am to Breesus
Koreans were my personal favorite. Those ships, scorpions, and battle wagons kicked arse.
I also had to question how dumb people were that got the Mayans or Aztecs. The Jaguar Warriors or the Plumed Archers weren't that good. Huns, while lack of houses was nice, sucked as well because you couldn't build a god damn wall. Thats an even bigger weakness than not having calvary.
I also had to question how dumb people were that got the Mayans or Aztecs. The Jaguar Warriors or the Plumed Archers weren't that good. Huns, while lack of houses was nice, sucked as well because you couldn't build a god damn wall. Thats an even bigger weakness than not having calvary.
This post was edited on 4/9/12 at 7:13 am
Posted on 4/9/12 at 7:40 am to OMLandshark
Anybody else play any of the "Blood" scenario games, like "Germ Blood" and "Castle Blood"? Those kicked arse and were fun quick games.
Posted on 4/9/12 at 7:45 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Anybody else play any of the "Blood" scenario games, like "Germ Blood" and "Castle Blood"? Those kicked arse and were fun quick games.
frick yeah.
Archer blood and castle blood were my favorite.
Posted on 4/9/12 at 7:54 am to taylork37
Forgot all about Archer Blood. That kicked arse as well, but I don't think it was quite as good as Castle and Germ Blood.
Did yall play "The Lord of the Rings" map? If you got Isengard, you were completely fricked, you weren't that much more powerful than the others, and when Rohan, Gondor, Rivendell, and the Shire just come to take you down at once, you didn't stand a chance.
Did yall play "The Lord of the Rings" map? If you got Isengard, you were completely fricked, you weren't that much more powerful than the others, and when Rohan, Gondor, Rivendell, and the Shire just come to take you down at once, you didn't stand a chance.
Posted on 4/9/12 at 2:28 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Did yall play "The Lord of the Rings" map?
i loved this map. It was so much fun
Posted on 4/9/12 at 5:38 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I also had to question how dumb people were that got the Mayans or Aztecs.
Eagle Warriors. Not countered by halbs and they even had a slight bonus vs cavalry. Not to mention, infantry had a bonus against buildings.
There were some other perks to them, but I'm too lazy to look them up.
Posted on 4/9/12 at 5:55 pm to OMLandshark
Used to play this game with a six pack of cream soda and a pack of slim jims. The cheats were awesome too, especially 'howdoiturnthison' which would give you a corvette with dual machine guns.
Posted on 4/9/12 at 7:33 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Used to play this game with a six pack of cream soda and a pack of slim jims. The cheats were awesome too, especially 'howdoiturnthison' which would give you a corvette with dual machine guns.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 11:30 am to dcrews
This thread needs to stay alive because this game is awesome and I want to talk about it some more
Posted on 4/11/12 at 11:47 am to dcrews
The trebuchets were badass, and I loved having a bunch of blacksmiths making cannons and battering rams.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 12:09 pm to Stonehog
quote:
blacksmiths
Siege Workshops ;)
I loved trebs. I remember people playing turks who would just leap frog towers all over the map with the mobile cannons you are talking about....you would be kicked if you tried to use them.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 6:02 pm to dcrews
/thread
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News