- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/13/15 at 7:06 pm to Tiger Attorney
i see the emotions are running a little high after a win 
shite fellas yeah it sucks our head coach is a fricking buffoon and the passing offence is hard to watch
but it was a road W and i'll take that every time
no pours down tonight my liver wants but my head say noooz
shite fellas yeah it sucks our head coach is a fricking buffoon and the passing offence is hard to watch
but it was a road W and i'll take that every time
no pours down tonight my liver wants but my head say noooz
This post was edited on 9/13/15 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 9/13/15 at 7:28 pm to No8Easy2
Let me help get us back on track
Posted on 9/13/15 at 7:41 pm to NOLAGT
I'm with you No8
Posted on 9/13/15 at 8:03 pm to JCANS
Just Win Baby!
Posted on 9/13/15 at 9:47 pm to jflsufan
Oban 14
Scotch is just more complex and interesting. I love it all...just the way I have seen it for years.
Scotch is just more complex and interesting. I love it all...just the way I have seen it for years.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:17 am to Tiger Attorney
quote:
Scotch is just more complex and interesting.
Much like Les Miles.
Still feeling that EHTBP from Sat night. Love that stuff. Bring on Auburn.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 10:50 am to Tiger Attorney
I think that's why I prefer bourbon and ryes. They're rougher around the edges, there can be a lot there, but you have to kinda peel at the layers. Nothing against Scotch, but it's almost too smooth quite often. The flavors are too muted or subtle for me. I'd rather something hitting me in the face with flavor, even if it's overpowering. Plus Bourbon is 'Merican and that wins every time for me on principle alone.
Give me the tough to handle sports car any day over the easy driving luxury sedan.
Give me the tough to handle sports car any day over the easy driving luxury sedan.
This post was edited on 9/14/15 at 10:51 am
Posted on 9/14/15 at 11:01 am to SnglMaltScotch
quote:
Enjoying a pregame flight and celebrating the procurement of some sweet wheat
1792
Barrel Select
Sweet Wheat
Barrel Select Q Bins
Barrel Select Calandros
Small Batch
Thoughts:
Barrel Select Q Bins (7.5): Flavor was aggressive with solid complexity. Finish was a little harsh for me.
Barrel Select Calandros (7.5): Pretty sure it is the same stuff as the Q Bins. If not, I couldn't tell the difference.
Barrel Select (7): Could very well be the same as the other Barrel Selects. Maybe a touch lighter on the flavor and the finish.
Small Batch (5): Reasonable flavor. Much smoother than the Barrel Selects but the smoothness seems to mask a lesser flavor.
Sweet Wheat (0.5): Not very good at all. No reasonable flavor to speak of. No finish. Nothing. It was like drinking water.
This post was edited on 9/14/15 at 11:14 am
Posted on 9/14/15 at 11:13 am to SnglMaltScotch
quote:
To celebrate the beginning of the NFL season. Brought out some solid artillery.
How but them Cowboys?
Review (Scores out of 10):
Talisker 18 yo (8.5): Yeah... I know what you are saying... But SMS you are a Glenfiddich guy. I am.. But the Talisker is better. The best combination of the oakiness of the Glenfiddich and the peatness of the Laphroaig. Delicious, complex, flavorful, smooth. Really nice.
Glenfiddich 18 yo (8.0): What can I say. It's delicious. The older Glen's get a bit sweet for me. Sweetness of almost an apple juice.
Jonnie Walker Platinum (6.0): Solid but uninspiring. Kinda like the Honda Accord of 18yo scotches. Solid flavor, solid complexity, just solid.
Highland Park (5.99): It was really close between the Highland Park and the JW. The Highland Park lost out on the finish. An small unpleasant woodiness a bit like eating bark. Not too bad but not great.
Laphroaig (3.5): What can I say. I am trying. I really am... But the Islay scotches might just not be for me. It is so peaty and so different. I will continue my effort to like them but I am not there yet.
Glenmorangie (1.5): Very strong woody finish. Overpowers the entire scotch. Unpleasant. Really doesn't compete with the others.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 11:33 am to SnglMaltScotch
quote:
Sweet Wheat (0.5): Not very good at all. No reasonable flavor to speak of. No finish. Nothing. It was like drinking water.
THANK YOU!
Posted on 9/14/15 at 11:38 am to PurpGold 14-0
So disappointed in the Sweet Wheat.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 11:58 am to jflsufan
Alot of good info SMS and thanks for sharing, I always find it interesting comparing my tastes with someone else's and while I don't have many of the bottles you sampled I dont think I'll be hunting sweet wheat!
But my next bottle of scotch with be the Glen 18
But my next bottle of scotch with be the Glen 18
Posted on 9/14/15 at 1:56 pm to No8Easy2
Glad I didnt swing by Martins on Friday to pick up the Sweet Wheat.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 3:32 pm to JCANS
Sweet wheat is pretty good I though.. There just isn't enough rare notes in it for some
FPD sazerac
FPD sazerac
Posted on 9/14/15 at 3:53 pm to jflsufan
quote:
So disappointed in the Sweet Wheat.
I'm more disappointed in the odd balls trading ETL for Sweet Wheat.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 4:11 pm to PurpGold 14-0
quote:
quote: I'm more disappointed in the odd balls trading ETL for Sweet Wheat.
I bought 2 bottles of Sweet Wheat. I would love to do that trade.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 4:32 pm to jflsufan
quote:
quote: I'm more disappointed in the odd balls trading ETL for Sweet Wheat.
I bought 2 bottles of Sweet Wheat. I would love to do that trade.
Me too.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 5:09 pm to SnglMaltScotch
Are people really doing that? I can always go pick some up if it gets me some ETL haha
Posted on 9/14/15 at 6:00 pm to Uncle JackD
quote:
Sweet wheat is pretty good I though.. There just isn't enough rare notes in it for some
I'm a wheater so may be partial, but it's a mild bourbon I like every once in a while to break up the ECBP/high proofers. The Wellers, especially the 12/107 mix is admittedly deeper and more flavorful.
It isn't worth more than $35, and had I paid $50 I'd be a little more bothered by it.
Also, not having to search too hard to find it was a plus.
Page 1150 of 1513
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News