Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Pulled pork in less than 3 hours.

Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:04 pm
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4053 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:04 pm
I know everyone will read the subject like and go "yeah right". Any pulled pork in 3 hours wont' be as good as that pulled pork I meticulously watched over for 13 hours on my smoker. Hear me out. I've slaved over many a pork shoulder, brisket, and ribs on a horizontal smoker or vertical smoker. When everyone at the tailgate wants BBQ I'm the guy who gets stuck with the job of setting aside half a day to tend my fire and my meat. I ain't going to lie sometimes watching over a fire for 10+ hours can get tedious.

One noon kickoff last year I fell asleep early and totally forgot to put the butt on the smoker. Woke up at 6am with cold meat still in the fridge. Here is what I did.

I put some deep score lines with my knife in the butt almost quartering it to help with the cook time. Rubbed the butt down like normal then 2 hours on low pressure in the Instapot with just a smidge of water at the bottom to help build the pressure. I actually cooked it for 1 hour, checked it, added 30 more minutes, checked again, and added 30 more until the pork was falling apart. 2 hours seems to work for a 6-8lbs butt. Like any pulled pork made in a crock pot you either have to make it swimming in BBQ sauce (gross, I hate pulled pork like that cooked in BBQ sauce) or there just isn't any flavor to it. I like the flavor in my pulled pork from the bark and the rub. You don't need a sauce the eat my pork as it stands up with flavor on it's own. Sauce is only to compliment the rub. Anyways... back to the pork...

I then coated the pork with more rub and stuck it on a hot charcoal grill with a few chunks of pecan for smoke.



The hot grill chars the fat, caramelizes the sugar in the rub, and gives it a little bark (texture) and color. Because the meat is spread out on the grill in just a couple of minutes it develops a really nice smoke flavor. You also have more rub being caramelized over a greater surface area of meat. There is tons of flavor. The bark is perfect as you grill it just enough to give it a char. Your bark has a hint of texture without having the shoe leather texture. Since you are smoking the meat over a hot grill the smoke is from a nice hot clean burn so your you get that sweet smokey flavor from that thin blue smoke instead of bitter creosote from a poorly developed fire with billowly cold white smoke.



I've done 5-6 butts this way over the last year and no one is on to my gig. In fact I've had many people say the pork done this way is the best I've done. Don't have an instapot but have more time? Same method works in the crock pot you just need 6-8 hours instead. But, still way easier. The results will speak for themselves. Do it this way a couple of times and you won't go back. I know I haven't.
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12729 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:24 pm to
Not bad. I've done it in the crockpot before. I usually use a bone-in picnic roast for it, and when the bone pops out it is ready. I may try this next time and get it out before fully tender and finish on the grill.
Posted by StripedSaint
Member since Jun 2011
2385 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Any pulled pork in 3 hours wont' be as good as that pulled pork I meticulously watched over for 13 hours on my smoker.
Posted by Parrish
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
2082 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 4:42 pm to
How was the moisture? Id worry about the smaller chunks drying out.

quote:

I ain't going to lie sometimes watching over a fire for 10+ hours can get tedious.


This is why I now use an electric smoker.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25852 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 6:04 pm to
Why would you cheat yourself out of 10 hours of cooking (i.e. Drinking beer away from the wife and kids)?
Posted by MeridianDog
Home on the range
Member since Nov 2010
14159 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 7:31 pm to
I love pulled pork and would eat this with gusto!
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38653 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 8:44 pm to
13 hour pork can be better but it also can be a disappointment
I use a variant of your method and its nearly foolproof

the key to succulent pork is less the smoke to me than the long slow cook to melt the collagen and that's the part that this method gets right every time. you still use your fire skills at the end to bring it home
Posted by Nawlens Gator
louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
5827 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 12:21 am to

Pressure Cooker wins again! That looks great!

Posted by Degas
2187645493 posts
Member since Jul 2010
11385 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 3:17 am to
quote:

One noon kickoff last year I fell asleep early and totally forgot to put the butt on the smoker.
AKA passed out the night before.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
25787 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 4:05 am to
Pressure cooker
Posted by bosoxjo13
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
3249 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 3:20 pm to
Similar way to how I make carnitas. Pork doesn't always need to cook that long to be delicious
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram