- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Power is Out: Percolator Time
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:04 pm to CharlesUFarley
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:04 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
a properly brewed cup of coffee from the percolator (also depends on proper grind and roast) beats every other method of making coffee
Nah. I like the nostalgia factor too, but let's not go overboard.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 7:44 pm to YOURADHERE
quote:
MawMaw and PawPaw were no coffee nerds. MawMaw probably would've crushed a cig on your neck for this.
MawMaw and PawPaw probably drank shite coffee. No shame in that
Posted on 12/12/23 at 7:54 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
My grandmother in Steele, AL
I drove through there years ago. We stopped at a BBQ joint that had the menu up on the wall like a McDonald's. I had to laugh when I read a choice of a meal... It said enough for 4 people or 2 hogs.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 7:54 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
While it is easy to overextract or burn with a percolator, a properly brewed cup of coffee from the percolator (also depends on proper grind and roast) beats every other method of making coffee, and most drip sucks by comparison.
If you understand how a percolator works, you also understand that there are other brewing methods that have every benefit of the percolator with none, or at least fewer, drawbacks.
Fortunately, Alec has done all the work that it would take me to elaborate on this. And before anyone assumes he's a coffee snob, he basically sings love songs to drip coffee pots. Even the cheap ones.
And even he thinks percolators are the fricking worst
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:34 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
If you understand how a percolator works, you also understand that there are other brewing methods that have every benefit of the percolator with none, or at least fewer, drawbacks.
Fortunately, Alec has done all the work that it would take me to elaborate on this. And before anyone assumes he's a coffee snob, he basically sings love songs to drip coffee pots. Even the cheap ones.
He is complaining about electric percolators. I agree they are not nearly as good.
I use a stove top percolator. The result is tremendously better. I think it is because the water is heated to an more optimal temperature before it is exposed to the coffee. An electric percolator uses a pump and immediately begins to pump cold water over the coffee then heats up the extraction as it continues. An externally heated percolator does not expose the water to the coffee until the water has heated enough to naturally percolate through the mechanism. If you make enough, you clearly understand the differences between the two based on how smell and sound changes while brewing, just like a lot of good foods are cooked more according to feel and smell than time and temp.
In short: I don't like electro-perc either, though many home drip machines aren't even that good.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 5:16 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:
He is complaining about electric percolators. I agree they are not nearly as good.
I use a stove top percolator. The result is tremendously better.
It’s like we didn’t even watch the same video.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 6:33 am to YOURADHERE
quote:
MawMaw and PawPaw were no coffee nerds. MawMaw probably would've crushed a cig on your neck for this.
My PawPaw woulda crushed his cig on your neck. Nanny woulda spit snuff in your eye when you were down.
Both lived into their 80’s drinking shitty coffee, using tobacco, eating high carb/high fat diet, and working all damn day.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 10:46 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:
He is complaining about electric percolators. I agree they are not nearly as good. I use a stove top percolator. The result is tremendously better. I think it is because the water is heated to a more optimal temperature before it is exposed to the coffee. An electric percolator uses a pump and immediately begins to pump cold water over the coffee then heats up the extraction as it continues. An externally heated percolator does not expose the water to the coffee until the water has heated enough to naturally percolate through the mechanism. If you make enough, you clearly understand the differences between the two based on how smell and sound changes while brewing, just like a lot of good foods are cooked more according to feel and smell than time and temp. In short: I don't like electro-perc either, though many home drip machines aren't even that good.
You didn’t watch the video
He discusses and tests both. While he by no means liked the electric perc (which doesn’t use a pump), he found it to be significantly better than the stovetop. The fundamental issue is that percs can only operate with water at boiling temperatures, and boiling water is far too hot to brew coffee. Which means when you brew coffee in a perc, you just scald it over and over again.
If you like thick coffee (which I do), use a French press. You can use as much coffee as you want, steep it as long as you want, *and* control the temperature of the water.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 9:25 pm to Joshjrn
I haven't watched all the video because I find he little sh!t very annoying. You are right, his electro-perc doesn't have a pump. A variation of that design has a diaphragm in the heating element area that constantly circulates water independent of temp. I haven't seen one that didn't have that but I have really only seen three different models because I never really liked electro-perc coffee, but still find it better than most drip coffee.
That glass percolator illustrates why I went through all the trouble to find 50 year old percolators on Ebay. The boiling action he is complaining about is exactly why I don't like any of the modern percolators available today, though you can get good enough results with some of the stainless steel percolators sold today. The problem is the thermal properties of the glass, or steel, or if you've ever seen it, the old Corning Ware percolators (I have two). The various materials affect the process, just like a cast iron pan does some things really good. In the glass percolator, there is too much heat build up inside the percolator and it is causing the coffee to boil. I agree, that will ruin it. In modern stainless percolators, the steel is too thin and at least on an electric stove, it is very easy to scorch the coffee, probably because the heat conducts faster. The older stainless Revere is thicker, and by the time the coffee begins to percolate, you reduce the heat and the percolation continues at a slower rate. This is where the sound and smell comes in I referred to earlier, if you use those things to guide yourself you adjust the heat and get it right.
Note on the Corning Ware: it is a ceramic material with thermal characteristics somewhere between stainless and glass. A smaller one I have does alright, not great. It was given to me by someone who really didn't know what it was. A larger one I have sucks. We bought it when we couldn't find Revere anymore in the early 1970's. The larger one does that same thing as the glass one in the video.
That kid in the video is probably too young to have done any of the things I mentioned, but he is right that coffee made both ways in those two percolators he had will suck.
He is also right that coffee that is put into an insulated container (i.e thermos) will taste better than coffee that is kept warm in an open container, regardless of how it is made.
The Revere seems to be the right amount of thermal mass to be well matched to most stove tops, both gas and electric, and it won't, under normal circumstances, do what the glass one did in his video. I haven't tested it, but percolation occurs at lower than boiling point temps, just like your shower puts off steam at much lower temps than 212 F. I know I drink freshly made coffee out of a percolator, so it can't possibly be 212 degrees F or I'd be dead. In proper use, if there is boiling action it is minimal.
I will measure the temp of my first cup of coffee tomorrow morning to be sure.
That is a lot of typing about percolator coffee, probably more than is available anywhere else in the world today. Most people adapted to the crappy stuff fifty years ago just like most men adapted to sh!tty light American beer after World War II. If you really want to know more, I will continue.
That glass percolator illustrates why I went through all the trouble to find 50 year old percolators on Ebay. The boiling action he is complaining about is exactly why I don't like any of the modern percolators available today, though you can get good enough results with some of the stainless steel percolators sold today. The problem is the thermal properties of the glass, or steel, or if you've ever seen it, the old Corning Ware percolators (I have two). The various materials affect the process, just like a cast iron pan does some things really good. In the glass percolator, there is too much heat build up inside the percolator and it is causing the coffee to boil. I agree, that will ruin it. In modern stainless percolators, the steel is too thin and at least on an electric stove, it is very easy to scorch the coffee, probably because the heat conducts faster. The older stainless Revere is thicker, and by the time the coffee begins to percolate, you reduce the heat and the percolation continues at a slower rate. This is where the sound and smell comes in I referred to earlier, if you use those things to guide yourself you adjust the heat and get it right.
Note on the Corning Ware: it is a ceramic material with thermal characteristics somewhere between stainless and glass. A smaller one I have does alright, not great. It was given to me by someone who really didn't know what it was. A larger one I have sucks. We bought it when we couldn't find Revere anymore in the early 1970's. The larger one does that same thing as the glass one in the video.
That kid in the video is probably too young to have done any of the things I mentioned, but he is right that coffee made both ways in those two percolators he had will suck.
He is also right that coffee that is put into an insulated container (i.e thermos) will taste better than coffee that is kept warm in an open container, regardless of how it is made.
The Revere seems to be the right amount of thermal mass to be well matched to most stove tops, both gas and electric, and it won't, under normal circumstances, do what the glass one did in his video. I haven't tested it, but percolation occurs at lower than boiling point temps, just like your shower puts off steam at much lower temps than 212 F. I know I drink freshly made coffee out of a percolator, so it can't possibly be 212 degrees F or I'd be dead. In proper use, if there is boiling action it is minimal.
I will measure the temp of my first cup of coffee tomorrow morning to be sure.
That is a lot of typing about percolator coffee, probably more than is available anywhere else in the world today. Most people adapted to the crappy stuff fifty years ago just like most men adapted to sh!tty light American beer after World War II. If you really want to know more, I will continue.
This post was edited on 12/13/23 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 12/14/23 at 8:52 am to CharlesUFarley
Well, I was wrong. The temperature in the percolator is reaching 212 F. When finished the temp drops to 207 F when it hits the cup it is 188 F and probably still about that as I begin to sip.
I measured with a meat thermometer through the spout while it was percolating.
My previous conclusion about boiling was based on sound. None of the percolators I use are see through, so , I could still be wrong, but in the "bad" designs, you can hear vigorous boiling happening in the percolator while the coffee is brewing, in the good designs, you don't hear that. For the 50+ years I have been making coffee this way, I have always observed that a bad pot of coffee resulted if you hear that extra noise, but it does not appear to be because of temperature, though you can definitely run the stove too hot with any of them.
If you care, temperature in the cup fell to 136 F in the time it took to type this, which is still hot but nice and drinkable. I switch from sipping to drinking somewhere in between those two temps.
I measured with a meat thermometer through the spout while it was percolating.
My previous conclusion about boiling was based on sound. None of the percolators I use are see through, so , I could still be wrong, but in the "bad" designs, you can hear vigorous boiling happening in the percolator while the coffee is brewing, in the good designs, you don't hear that. For the 50+ years I have been making coffee this way, I have always observed that a bad pot of coffee resulted if you hear that extra noise, but it does not appear to be because of temperature, though you can definitely run the stove too hot with any of them.
If you care, temperature in the cup fell to 136 F in the time it took to type this, which is still hot but nice and drinkable. I switch from sipping to drinking somewhere in between those two temps.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:54 pm to CharlesUFarley
No worries man, I enjoy the discussion
As you noticed, for the perc to work, the water has to be fricking hot. As a general rule, coffee should be brewed between 195f and 205f (higher end of the range for light roasts, lower end for dark roasts). For most forms of brewing, from pour over to french press, this really isn't an issue. Even if you bring the water to boiling, by time you pour it through the air into the room temperature coffee grounds and let it sit, again exposed to air, the slurry temp falls into that range almost immediately. But with percs, physics dictates that for the water to achieve the pressure needed to force itself up, it's going to need to be at or near boiling the entire time. Further, because the entire vessel gets warmed, you aren't going to have the same cooling effect you get when you pour water out of a kettle and then let it sit for a few minutes. It gets hot and it stays hot.
Anyway, as always, people should enjoy what they enjoy. I think chicory in coffee is for poor people or people whose cities are under siege and can't get in enough real coffee, but I don't advocate for people who enjoy it to stop drinking coffee with chicory in it
But, if you find yourself thinking your coffee is a bit out of balance, with the bitter notes heavily outweighing the flavor notes, give something like a french press a try. Might change your perspective
As you noticed, for the perc to work, the water has to be fricking hot. As a general rule, coffee should be brewed between 195f and 205f (higher end of the range for light roasts, lower end for dark roasts). For most forms of brewing, from pour over to french press, this really isn't an issue. Even if you bring the water to boiling, by time you pour it through the air into the room temperature coffee grounds and let it sit, again exposed to air, the slurry temp falls into that range almost immediately. But with percs, physics dictates that for the water to achieve the pressure needed to force itself up, it's going to need to be at or near boiling the entire time. Further, because the entire vessel gets warmed, you aren't going to have the same cooling effect you get when you pour water out of a kettle and then let it sit for a few minutes. It gets hot and it stays hot.
Anyway, as always, people should enjoy what they enjoy. I think chicory in coffee is for poor people or people whose cities are under siege and can't get in enough real coffee, but I don't advocate for people who enjoy it to stop drinking coffee with chicory in it
But, if you find yourself thinking your coffee is a bit out of balance, with the bitter notes heavily outweighing the flavor notes, give something like a french press a try. Might change your perspective
Posted on 12/14/23 at 2:08 pm to Joshjrn
Yet, the equilibrium temperature when the 212 F degree water hits the lower temperature coffee grounds is close to the top of that 195F to 205F range for at least part of the percolation cycle. That would jive with my own suggestion of lowering the heat once the coffee starts to perc, which slows down the percolation. Running it lower would keep it in that range longer. I have noticed this effect for years. Remember also that once I was able to remove the basket and measure the temp of the coffee in the pot, it was 207 F. The actual temp at the point of extraction from the coffee could be at the top end of that range.
The 212 F temp was measured with a meat thermometer inserted into the spout while it was percolating. Hot water rises and would naturally collect there. At the point of percolation there is a natural evaporitve cooling effect, then the solution temp will be reduced due to equalizing with the temp with the coffee grounds.
If I can think of a good experiment I will get back to you.
The 212 F temp was measured with a meat thermometer inserted into the spout while it was percolating. Hot water rises and would naturally collect there. At the point of percolation there is a natural evaporitve cooling effect, then the solution temp will be reduced due to equalizing with the temp with the coffee grounds.
If I can think of a good experiment I will get back to you.
This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 12/14/23 at 2:08 pm to Joshjrn
quote:Thank you
people should enjoy what they enjoy.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 2:30 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
Yet, the equilibrium temperature when the 212 F degree water hits the lower temperature coffee grounds is close to the top of that 195F to 205F range for at least part of the percolation cycle. That would jive with my own suggestion of lowering the heat once the coffee starts to perc, which slows down the percolation. Running it lower would keep it in that range longer. I have noticed this effect for years. Remember also that once I was able to remove the basket and measure the temp of the coffee in the pot, it was 207 F. The actual temp at the point of extraction from the coffee could be at the top end of that range.
The 212 F temp was measured with a meat thermometer inserted into the spout while it was percolating. Hot water rises and would naturally collect there. At the point of percolation there is a natural evaporitve cooling effect, then the solution temp will be reduced due to equalizing with the temp with the coffee grounds.
If I can think of a good experiment I will get back to you.
I get that you could, with enough intervention, get a perc to not be terrible. There just isn't much of a point, in my opinion. At which point you've made it there, using a french press creates an equal or better product with less work. There's nothing that a perc brings to the table as a benefit that you can't have better using a different, less fiddly product.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 3:27 pm to Joshjrn
In my experience:
Stove Top Percolator > Commercial Grade drip coffee maker > pour over coffee/electrocperk > most home drip coffee makers > French Press >>>K-cup > Instant
I have only had French Press one time and I was not impressed. Everyone I know who went down that road abandoned it
I might try it again some day because I know at least three people who will probably give me one they don't use anymore.
Stove Top Percolator > Commercial Grade drip coffee maker > pour over coffee/electrocperk > most home drip coffee makers > French Press >>>K-cup > Instant
I have only had French Press one time and I was not impressed. Everyone I know who went down that road abandoned it
I might try it again some day because I know at least three people who will probably give me one they don't use anymore.
This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 12/14/23 at 3:43 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
I have only had French Press one time and I was not impressed.
Out of curiosity, what didn’t you like? That will help guide what was done wrong.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 3:56 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
Stove Top Percolator > Commercial Grade drip coffee maker > pour over coffee/electrocperk > most home drip coffee makers > French Press >>>K-cup > Instant
Wtf. You should open a cafe and sell your stove top perc coffee if it’s that good.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:14 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Out of curiosity, what didn’t you like? That will help guide what was done wrong.
It was cool and flavorless with no body. It was at a restaurant that made it in front of you. They knew there was a problem with the process because they poured boiling water in your cup to warm it up, then emptied it before they poured the coffee in it. It was still cold.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:17 pm to jordan21210
quote:
Wtf. You should open a cafe and sell your stove top perc coffee if it’s that good.
Then coffee making, something I enjoy, would become like work. It is the same reason I have no interest in entering a BBQ contest or trying to open a BBQ joint. Or for that matter, working for a microbrewery. Extraction temp is real important there too.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:41 pm to CharlesUFarley
I’m honestly intrigued. You come off as a coffee nerd but prefer a stove top percolator. Most coffee nerds go down the pour over or espresso route. What kind of beans and grinder do you typically use?
Back to top


0






