- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/7/14 at 8:31 pm to LSUGrad00
quote:
but got tied up opening the store before he had a chance to plate and freeze the cultures.
Bastard!
I'd get in on a Conan strain group order.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:31 pm to s14suspense
There's also been some recent speculation that the Conan in use now is not the same Conan that made Heady in the beginning. Let me do some digging. It apparently has a super quick mutation ability (that's a scientific term, btw)and attenuation drops off pretty quickly after a few generations.
Ah, here we go:
Guess I was wrong about that.
Source
Ah, here we go:
quote:
In his book IPA, Mitch Steele reports that The Alchemist uses a relatively low pitching rate (less than a .5 million cells per ml per degree Plato), fermenting at 68 F for a few days then up to 72 F. Elsewhere it has been reported that as the generation count rises, the attenuation drops. This is a larger concern for craft breweries, as few homebrewers reuse yeast for more than a couple of generations. A yeast which requires a bit of special attention.
quote:
In his article Vermont Cult Clones in the October 2013 issue of BYO, Dave Green mentions that "[I]n my conversations with the brewers it was indicated that Conan is no longer the strain that is being used." However there isn’t an explanation of whether this means that The Alchemist is no longer using the original isolate because it mutated, or if they have switched to a different yeast strain. (Luckily down in the comments, Art filled me in on his conversations with the author of the BYO article and John Kimmich of The Alchemist. Apparently they are still using Conan for Heady Topper, it is Hill Farmstead that is no longer using Conan, something I wasn't aware they did in the first place).
Guess I was wrong about that.
Source
Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:48 pm to LSUGrad00
quote:
I can get you a can. Shoot me an email with your mailing address. foreverlsu00 at gmail.com
Done. You will get first dibs on the yeast

Posted on 1/7/14 at 9:53 pm to BottomlandBrew
quote:
attenuation drops off pretty quickly after a few generations.
I've seen that in a few places. Typically you are going to get more mutations later on once the environment starts to stress the yeast. This is why you can only wash a yeast strand for so many generations before you start to notice changes. However, those changes may be beneficial b/c the yeast is adapting to your setup and style.
I typically top harvest and wash. I've seen estimates that you can top harvest up to maybe a 1,000 generations before running into issues. I have original top harvest of the crooked stave brett and my house blend. I need to slant those up pretty soon and stash away.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 10:20 pm to rds dc
Makes sense. Sort of like a cancer from radiation exposure, I guess? I don't know, just trying to find an analogy.
Get a hold of that Heady and put your micro knowledge to use for the greater good of the TD Homebrew community.
Get a hold of that Heady and put your micro knowledge to use for the greater good of the TD Homebrew community.

Posted on 1/7/14 at 10:38 pm to BottomlandBrew
Interesting read Bottomland.
Yeast is so interesting.
Stone didn't think that yeast that had been through IPA batches would be good for fermenting Arrogant Bastard but somehow it was actually better after a batch or two of IPA, like it toughened it up or something.
Yeast is so interesting.
Stone didn't think that yeast that had been through IPA batches would be good for fermenting Arrogant Bastard but somehow it was actually better after a batch or two of IPA, like it toughened it up or something.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 10:38 pm to BottomlandBrew
Just finished another batch of my Black Ale. It was awesome.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 8:20 am to SouthOfSouth
quote:
SouthOfSouth
I read that book. Pretty interesting read.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 9:40 am to LSUGrad00
quote:
I'm planning on brewing the double sunshine recipe from the VT clone issue of BYO later this week.
I'd pay to try that. Double sunshine is amazing.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:05 am to BugAC
quote:
I read that book. Pretty interesting read.
Yea. I'm a few chapters in. Not bad stuff. Starting to try and see what it would take to open up a brew pub type thing. See how viable an option it is.

Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:17 am to SouthOfSouth
I brewed a milk stout last Saturday and I'm not getting much airlock action as of this morning. Are stouts a longer process?
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:21 am to LSURoss
quote:
I brewed a milk stout last Saturday and I'm not getting much airlock action as of this morning. Are stouts a longer process?
Fermentation can take a day, fermentation can take a month. A lot of stouts are aged longer, but that doesn't depend on the fermentation. Sounds like your brew is just fine at this point.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:25 am to SouthOfSouth
Thanks for the reply. I guess I got spoiled on that saison and the belgian yeast. 8 straight days of monster fermentation 

This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 10:31 am
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:32 am to LSURoss
quote:
Thanks for the reply. I guess I got spoiled on that saison and the belgian yeast. 8 straight days of monster fermentation
Might be a little cool at your place right now. Try to put it in the warmest spot of your house. At least 65+.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:33 am to s14suspense
Checked temp this am and it's at 68. Should have mentioned that in my 1st post. 

Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:37 am to LSURoss
Did you use any maltodextrin in that milk stout? What was your OG? What yeast did you pitch and how much?
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:40 am to BottomlandBrew
I brewed with a buddy and he has all the notes. I know off hand that the OG was right in for what the kit called for. We just a liquid yeast in a bag that had a bubble thing you had to pop in it. I've always used the vial that you just shake. I'll find out and reply in a bit
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:42 am to LSURoss
Just curious. I'm sure your beer is fine.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:59 am to LSURoss
quote:
I brewed with a buddy and he has all the notes. I know off hand that the OG was right in for what the kit called for. We just a liquid yeast in a bag that had a bubble thing you had to pop in it. I've always used the vial that you just shake. I'll find out and reply in a bit
Yall smacked the pack ahead of time and it swelled up on its own?
Popular
Back to top
