- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Has anyone ever sous vide a pork tenderloin for 12 hours? (Updated with pics)
Posted on 3/12/19 at 9:45 am
Posted on 3/12/19 at 9:45 am
I put one in before 8 this morning and I won't be home till shortly before 8 tonight. I figured I would give it a shot since I wasn't going to have time to cook this evening any ways. Should I pick something else up on the way home or will it turn out fine? TIA
It held up its texture pretty well. 3 hours is definitely better but if I’m ever in a crunch I will not hesitate to do it again.
It held up its texture pretty well. 3 hours is definitely better but if I’m ever in a crunch I will not hesitate to do it again.
This post was edited on 3/12/19 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 3/12/19 at 9:49 am to al_cajun
well it's not going be overcooked, but the texture might be different than what you are used to
12 hours is a long time (too long) for a tenderloin IMO
12 hours is a long time (too long) for a tenderloin IMO
Posted on 3/12/19 at 9:55 am to Salmon
Report back, I've always been curious how something like this would hold up if I set something out before work or at lunch to save time at night.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 10:06 am to al_cajun
No, not that long... but I've done them for 4 or 5 hours before and they were amazing.
I've done pork ribs for 36ish hours, also amazing.
I've done pork ribs for 36ish hours, also amazing.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 10:11 am to Salmon
quote:
texture might be different than what you are used to
Yeah I've done lamb and steaks for 4 hours and the texture really started to get on the mushy side. Wouldn't do that again. I know pork is a different animal and all, but I imagine a tenderloin would react similarly.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 10:27 am to The Last Coco
quote:
but I imagine a tenderloin would react similarly.
Yep, it's not called a "tenderloin" for nothing. One of the most tender pieces of pork available.
It takes me no more than 15 minutes on the grill once the grill is hot enough to cook on----if that long. I'll marinate the loin for several hours prior to grilling and they come out great.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:13 am to al_cajun
That's 12X longer than I usually do mine in the water bath
I haven't seen anywhere where they recommend more than 4 hours.
May be a weird pulled pork tenderloin you come home too. Let us all know
I haven't seen anywhere where they recommend more than 4 hours.
May be a weird pulled pork tenderloin you come home too. Let us all know
Posted on 3/12/19 at 1:06 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
I've done pork ribs for 36ish hours, also amazing.
I may try this. Can't smoke at the house we are currently in while we are building, so this may be a great way to get some ribs. What temp you set and for how long?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 4:10 pm to al_cajun
Shouldn't be a problem for pork, just make sure to get a good sear.
This post was edited on 3/12/19 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 3/12/19 at 8:35 pm to al_cajun
Over cooked imo.
I’d go for 113 for 3 hours.
Rest then sear to 125. I like it medrare-med.
I’d go for 113 for 3 hours.
Rest then sear to 125. I like it medrare-med.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 8:42 pm to GeauxTigers80
Definitely over cooked, my old lady isn’t a fan medium rare to medium pork. So I go for medium well.
Posted on 3/13/19 at 2:00 pm to al_cajun
I still haven't seen a temperature mentioned but it looks dry and cooked at too high of a temp for my preference. I usually go 135 for over an hour.
Popular
Back to top
7











