- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Full N.O. City Council to Vote on Smoking Ban in All Restaurants, etc.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:41 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:41 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why? I care more about non smokers' health than smokers getting to smoke anywhere they like.
Yeah b/c smokers can smoke where ever they like. There are a ton of bars that are smoke free. In fact a majority of bars I frequent on a regulars basis are smoke free. Henrys, Fat Harry's, Tips, NOLA Tap Room, and Cooters are all smoke free. The only places I go that aren't are Vous and the Bulldog. People should pay attention to what places like Ave Pub are doing. They got it right.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:41 am to LNCHBOX
I fail to see why a non-smoker cannot avoid a designated "smoking friendly" club, if given prior notice. Why is it necessary for the anti-smoking nazis to prohibit smoking in EVERY SINGLE PUBLIC RESTAURANT AND BAR?
Even going so far as to prevent the opening of futre Cigar bars and Hookah bars...... WOW!!!
Even going so far as to prevent the opening of futre Cigar bars and Hookah bars...... WOW!!!
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:42 am to Salmon
quote:
no
Who are you to tell me what I feel?
quote:
you care about your own demands over that of the owner of the private business in which you freely chose to enter
Wrong. I support business owners in just about any other way. In this one particular way, I chose the well being of a group that doesn't want to participate in an activity over the convenience of the group that participates.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:43 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
I fail to see why a non-smoker cannot avoid a designated "smoking friendly" club,
I fail to see why a smoker can't smoke outside, then no one has to avoid anything.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:43 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I chose the well being of a group that doesn't want to participate in an activity over the convenience of the group that participates.
Not Cigar and Hookah bar owners.......
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:44 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Not Cigar and Hookah bar owners.......
Did I say I agree with all provisions of this proposed law?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:44 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I chose the well being of a group that doesn't want to participate in an activity
they don't have to go to those places...
see how freedom works?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:44 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
I fail to see why a non-smoker cannot avoid a designated "smoking friendly" club, if given prior notice. Why is it necessary for the anti-smoking nazis to prohibit smoking in EVERY SINGLE PUBLIC RESTAURANT AND BAR?
Even going so far as to prevent the opening of futre Cigar bars and Hookah bars...... WOW!!!
You're forgetting that the primary role government officials and entities subscribe to themselves is to do something. Anything. Take action. Otherwise why do they exist? They don't allow themselves to keep their hands off any facet of life, including legislating morality - because in their eyes unless they're writing new laws and regulations they're not doing their jobs. They don't understand that sometimes people want their elected officials just keep government out of their hair .. not find "problems" that need fixin'
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 10:46 am
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:45 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I fail to see why a smoker can't smoke outside, then no one has to avoid anything.
I own this bar. I want to smoke inside of it. I cannot because YOU MAY want to enter at some indeterminate time in the future. Preposterous.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:46 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
I own this bar. I want to smoke inside of it. I cannot because YOU MAY want to enter at some indeterminate time in the future.
Don't open a public business if you don't like it.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:47 am to LNCHBOX
I own this PRIVATE CLUB. I want to smoke inside of it. I cannot because YOU MAY want to enter at some indeterminate time in the future. Preposterous.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:47 am to Salmon
quote:
they don't have to go to those places...
Right, so we get inconvenienced for your freedom. Yay for freedom.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:47 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
I own this PRIVATE CLUB.
Business open to the public. Get your terms right.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:47 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Wrong. I support business owners in just about any other way. In this one particular way, I chose the well being of a group that doesn't want to participate in an activity over the convenience of the group that participates.
Yikes. Next thing you know you'll be throwing around terms like "collective" and "centralized."
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:48 am to Rohan2Reed
Right, because I lean this way with everything.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:48 am to LNCHBOX
Screw your convenience. You are not entitled to convenience.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:49 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Right, so we get inconvenienced for your freedom. Yay for freedom.
which makes more sense
inconveniencing the owner of the property, or the person who wishes to enter the property?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:50 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Screw your convenience. You are not entitled to convenience.
Screw you giving me health problems. So at least you admit you're selfish.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:50 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Cantrell’s ordinance would make it illegal to smoke, with a few exceptions, in all enclosed public spaces, private clubs, correctional facilities and school buildings in the city. Smoking also would be prohibited in parks during public events sponsored by the city and outdoors within 25 feet of public property and within 5 feet of commercial buildings.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 10:51 am to Sid in Lakeshore
Again, did I say that I agree with the entire proposed law?
Popular
Back to top


0




