- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone think some people take food maybe a little too seriously here?
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:22 am to Powerman
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:22 am to Powerman
quote:
Right. But you can have fresh fries that aren't "hand cut"
Just put the exact same fresh potato through a fry cutter.
Ohhhh. I get ya. I use a knife because I am a cheap skate and don't like gadget clutter.
Yeah, if anyone is trying to sell the idea that this somehow improves the fry over a mechanical cutter... that's just laughable.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:23 am to andouille
quote:
There are 4 necessities in life:
Food
Shelter
Clothing
Football
Everyone takes at least one of those things very seriously.
Right. And nothing wrong with taking those things seriously. I guess I just don't get the point of going overboard. For some people it's an inane moral quest and an obsession.
Take Mike da Tigah for instance. Guy is always preaching and acting like he is too good for everything. Yet he lives in Baton Rouge, the city that he decries as being a culinary wasteland. Seems like a rather conflicting life choice given the claim that food is so important to him.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:24 am to coloradoBengal
quote:
Yeah, if anyone is trying to sell the idea that this somehow improves the fry over a mechanical cutter... that's just laughable.
I'll bet you that someone challenges this notion in this thread. They won't have any reason why, but they just "know" it's better.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
oh really?
quote:
The study, published in the journal British Poultry Science, was carried out at Bristol University.
Researchers gave ten tasters samples from 120 chickens which had been reared in various ways.
Wow. Epic sample size there bro.
How about posting some research findings showing how hormone-pumped, preservative laden foods give people higher risk of cancer? (not to mention how disgusting the idea of eating a lab-raised, chemically injected animal is).
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:35 am to Rohan2Reed
I find the the saline bath infuses a great ocean-y taste in farmed fish. 
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:52 am to Powerman
Well, one FACT I can tell you in life is that no place ever changed for the better by accepting the satus quo as the way it is and not making better personal choices and encouraging others to do likewise for the good of their own personal community, a community you don't live in btw.
Similarly, places like Austin didn't have pixie dust sprinkled on them to magically become recognized as a food city. The people simply decided that they wouldn't accept anything less, and yes, it took people to vote for that in their choices. Why do garbage restaurants not work in New Orleans proper? Because there are other choices that are far better, and because the people will not put up with crap when there are better options. Now, New Orleans has been doing this for far longer than any of us have even been alive, so it's a fixture in the city, but to create change where there is no such food environment, it takes the people themselves to vote for that in where they decide to go eat and what they will accept and what they won't.
The Baton Rouge restaurant scene is nothing more than a mirror reflection of the people and their choices. If tomorrow, they decide they are going to choose to only patron those restaurants that serve stellar food, then Baton Rouge itself and it's restaurant scene will change OVERNIGHT. That's how it works. We are not victims to something that befell poor old Baton Rouge. We are victims to our own decisions and what we will tolerate and what we will not. Baton Rouge itself can be as big a food mecca as it chooses to be, and that's all in what we choose to accept. If I didn't believe in Baton Rouge, I would never bother encouraging it, and if I didn't have a vested interest in Baton Rouge it wouldn't bother me, as it doesn't bother you living in the greater NOLA area.
Accepting the low road does nothing but keep the status quo exactly where it is, and while that may benifit those who own restaurants that suck here, and chains that dominate the landscape, it really doesn't make Baton Rouge a "BETTER PLACE" to live, or benifit the people in the quality of life they can experience here. It doesn't make it a point of destination for others either, but rather a place to gas up on their way elsewhere.
In short, Baton Rouge is small because the people of Baton Rouge think small. If and when they begin to think bigger, the place will change for the better. Until then, you will have those who desire change, and the old guard fighting change, because change is nothing any of them take too kindly to in anything here. It's slow and fought tooth and nail every step of the way, because they don't understand it, and what they don't understand is pretentious, liberal, commie, or just flat out unAmerican. Probably USC fans as well. Damn terrorists trying to change me.
Similarly, places like Austin didn't have pixie dust sprinkled on them to magically become recognized as a food city. The people simply decided that they wouldn't accept anything less, and yes, it took people to vote for that in their choices. Why do garbage restaurants not work in New Orleans proper? Because there are other choices that are far better, and because the people will not put up with crap when there are better options. Now, New Orleans has been doing this for far longer than any of us have even been alive, so it's a fixture in the city, but to create change where there is no such food environment, it takes the people themselves to vote for that in where they decide to go eat and what they will accept and what they won't.
The Baton Rouge restaurant scene is nothing more than a mirror reflection of the people and their choices. If tomorrow, they decide they are going to choose to only patron those restaurants that serve stellar food, then Baton Rouge itself and it's restaurant scene will change OVERNIGHT. That's how it works. We are not victims to something that befell poor old Baton Rouge. We are victims to our own decisions and what we will tolerate and what we will not. Baton Rouge itself can be as big a food mecca as it chooses to be, and that's all in what we choose to accept. If I didn't believe in Baton Rouge, I would never bother encouraging it, and if I didn't have a vested interest in Baton Rouge it wouldn't bother me, as it doesn't bother you living in the greater NOLA area.
Accepting the low road does nothing but keep the status quo exactly where it is, and while that may benifit those who own restaurants that suck here, and chains that dominate the landscape, it really doesn't make Baton Rouge a "BETTER PLACE" to live, or benifit the people in the quality of life they can experience here. It doesn't make it a point of destination for others either, but rather a place to gas up on their way elsewhere.
In short, Baton Rouge is small because the people of Baton Rouge think small. If and when they begin to think bigger, the place will change for the better. Until then, you will have those who desire change, and the old guard fighting change, because change is nothing any of them take too kindly to in anything here. It's slow and fought tooth and nail every step of the way, because they don't understand it, and what they don't understand is pretentious, liberal, commie, or just flat out unAmerican. Probably USC fans as well. Damn terrorists trying to change me.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 10:53 am to Rohan2Reed
quote:
not to mention how disgusting the idea of eating a lab-raised, chemically injected animal is
The idea of eating a lot of things could be theoretically disgusting
For instance: people regularly eat and rave about things such as raw fish, things that are dug up out of the dirt, eating organs, etc.
A lot of other stupid conflicting things as well. People hate on "processed foods" and eat sausage. Then they hate on foods "with preservatives" yet they eat things that are pickled.
It's just amazing to me how silly some people are.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 11:14 am to Powerman
quote:
For instance: people regularly eat and rave about things such as raw fish, things that are dug up out of the dirt, eating organs, etc.
I'll eat a pig nose to tail if I know it was killed in the wild and butchered that morning. (have done this many times at the camp). When I say "disgusting" I'm referring to McDonald's and the like. I'll take fresh goat liver over a fast-food hamburger.
quote:
People hate on "processed foods" and eat sausage. Then they hate on foods "with preservatives" yet they eat things that are pickled.
I agree some people are hypocritical when it comes to such things, but for many educated folks they know the difference between store-bought vacuum-sealed sausage from Sam's Club vs. restaurant sausage where they grind meat and prepare in-house. And not sure how you're comparing preservatives to pickling. Pickling can be done in the home in a matter of minutes. Not the same as processed food containing something like butylated hydroxyanisole.
This post was edited on 4/12/12 at 11:16 am
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:23 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
Why do garbage restaurants not work in New Orleans proper?
I've been to no less than a dozen garbage restaurants in New Orleans. Not sure what you're talking about.
I'd say 75% of the Mexican places here are terrible at best. All the Indian restaurants in New Orleans metro suck. The Japanese restaurants are no better than Baton Rouge.
The bread and butter for NOLA is fine dining, creole, and Italian IMO. There just happens to be a huge abundance of those places.
quote:
In short, Baton Rouge is small because the people of Baton Rouge think small. If and when they begin to think bigger, the place will change for the better. Until then, you will have those who desire change, and the old guard fighting change, because change is nothing any of them take too kindly to in anything here. It's slow and fought tooth and nail every step of the way, because they don't understand it, and what they don't understand is pretentious, liberal, commie, or just flat out unAmerican. Probably USC fans as well. Damn terrorists trying to change me.
Seems like a bit of a generalization to me
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:28 pm to Cold Cous Cous
quote:
really can't speak to the benefits of organic meat, but for veggies organics are often way better. Farmer's market creole tomatoes vs. Wal Mart tomatoes is not even a close call in terms of quality. That's partly due to relative freshness, partly due to breeding (some tomatoes are bred to be delicious, some are bred to be hardy, easily shippable, and look attractive.)
Just because they are Farmer's Market doesn't mean they are organic. Most aren't. I grow ton's of great tasting homegrown creole and heirloom tomatos and I Miracle Gro the shite out of them.
quote:
Anyone think some people take food maybe a little too seriously here?
I made butter today.
quote:
Anyone think some people take food maybe a little too seriously here?
If you put anything other than sea salt and fresh ground cracked black pepper on your steak you are a freak.
quote:
Anyone think some people take food maybe a little too seriously here?
I can toss out an "F" bomb from time to time to keep it real.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:28 pm to Rohan2Reed
quote:
I agree some people are hypocritical when it comes to such things, but for many educated folks they know the difference between store-bought vacuum-sealed sausage from Sam's Club vs. restaurant sausage where they grind meat and prepare in-house.
Sure, but the point is, it's all "processed"
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:34 pm to Martini
Martini...
"When keeping it real meant something"
"When keeping it real meant something"
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:34 pm to Powerman
So? Are you suggested that's not a relative term? That there aren't varying degrees? I'd argue that each polar end of the "processed" spectrum are rather far apart with many levels in between.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:40 pm to Powerman
quote:
Take Mike da Tigah for instance.
Stop taking HIM so seriously.
Seems, he really gets you worked up here.
As for me, I'll prefer people with passion on any number of subjects, who may tend to go a bit overboard with their passion sometimes, to bland sameness any day -- especially if my only exposure to their overboardness is running across a message board posting of their's now and then revealing them going overboard.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:42 pm to Rohan2Reed
This thread has gotten really serious for not being about chili or gumbo.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:44 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
Why do garbage restaurants not work in New Orleans proper?
You serious Clark? There are countless shitty restaurants in NOLA proper.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:44 pm to coloradoBengal
quote:
This board suffers from the "my way is better than yours" syndrome
So true
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:47 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Take Mike da Tigah for instance.
Stop taking HIM so seriously.
Seems, he really gets you worked up here.
I'm also willing to bet anybody on here that he has eaten at a chain in the last two weeks. He also waited over a year to go to Beausoleil, if he has even been. His heart is in the right place but his head is generally up his arse.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 12:50 pm to Rohan2Reed
quote:
Wow. Epic sample size there bro.
are there any other independent surveys you can link? there aren't many huge blind taste testings of organic v non-organic out there. one day, but they just aren't out yet
as has been shown countless times in general, though, when you THINK you're eating "better" food, you're going to THINK it tastes better. now, how that food is "better" varies. for some it's price. for some it's perceived freshness. for some it's organic. study after study shows that taste is LARGELY a function of stuff having nothing to do with what you're putting in your mouth
for example,
quote:
(not to mention how disgusting the idea of eating a lab-raised, chemically injected animal is
this clouds your perception of "disgusting" food
regardless of how it tastes, if you're told you have to eat an organic chicken dish and processed chicken dish made exactly the same, you're going to say the organic tastes better due to perception, and not taste
quote:
How about posting some research findings showing how hormone-pumped, preservative laden foods give people higher risk of cancer?
any legit links to studies on this?
there seems to be a lot of bark and inconsistent data on this point. organic and inorganic foods both seem to have positives and negatives, health-wise
Popular
Back to top


1







