Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

So what are the chances the water goes over the levees in BR/LSU?

Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:23 am
Posted by Krewe Of Tigers 0307
Tiger Stadium
Member since Feb 2011
353 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:23 am
This is with Morganza open.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49473 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:24 am to
0.000000000000000000016%
Posted by jmcamz2899
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2009
883 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:28 am to
i hope 0.000000000000000000000000%
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25545 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:29 am to
Sadly anytime a levee system is stressed this much there is always some chance of catastrophe.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55594 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:37 am to
Even with the Morganza closed, it's not supposed to top the levees here (at least that's what I was told by someone from the Ponchatrain Levee Board).

At this point (not counting any possible rain) it's going to get about 6ft from topping the levee downtown, 10ft at the campus.

The problem isn't topping the levee, the problem is possible levee breaks. The pressure this will put on the levees and any weakness exaccerbated by the seepage is another story though.

Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34166 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:47 am to
Will not top, but the main concern is the water will crest on the 23rd and remain at that level for a week or more if not longer. Thats a long time and constant pressure on the levees.

This is the Mississippi River drainage system. All the oxbow lakes, floodways up north, and various other water holding areas will flow back down the mississippi eventually
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
105600 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:55 am to
Posted by HeadBusta4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
11331 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:55 am to
quote:

10ft at the campus


Its pretty much there now
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55594 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 11:59 am to
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
20967 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Even with the Morganza closed, it's not supposed to top the levees here (at least that's what I was told by someone from the Ponchatrain Levee Board).


A lot of conflicting information:

Problems 3 Miles South of Baton Rouge, including LSU, if Morganza not opened
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55594 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 12:03 pm to
In my defense, he had a gun so I was forced to believe him
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
20967 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

In my defense, he had a gun so I was forced to believe him


Not taking a shot. I really don't know what to believe. I guess we'll have to trust the Corps on this.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9855 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 12:43 pm to

I cannot imagine the state would allow flood waters anywhere near LSU. They have to much money invested in the LSU area with research, buildings, critical state infrastructure.

You have to believe that if an imminent failure of the levees in the LSU area occurred that the State would breach the levees elsewhere to keep water away from LSU.
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Consider this a warning



Second Warning
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55594 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

I cannot imagine the state would allow flood waters anywhere near LSU. They have to much money invested in the LSU area with research, buildings, critical state infrastructure.

You have to believe that if an imminent failure of the levees in the LSU area occurred that the State would breach the levees elsewhere to keep water away from LSU.


If there were a place where the impact would be barely felt, sure. The problem is that a lot of the area long both sides of the Mississippi are decently populated and there is such a wide-ranging are of lower lands that any breach would end up effecting lots and lots of people because of the sheer amount and depth of water.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9855 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 1:12 pm to

quote:

If there were a place where the impact would be barely felt, sure


They would be forced to find a place.

Of course, someone would lose big time.

But the University is one of the biggest economic drivers for the state. There is no way they could allow it to be flooded.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55594 posts
Posted on 5/10/11 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

But the University is one of the biggest economic drivers for the state. There is no way they could allow it to be flooded.


You're probably right. I'm just glad I'm not the guy that has to make that call.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram