Started By
Message
locked post

W.....T.....F.....TRADE???

Posted on 10/28/12 at 11:55 am
Posted by KPCrimson
Dothan, AL
Member since Jun 2008
2103 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 11:55 am
Our league does not have veto privileges. I like it because the players decide what they want and the Commish approves.

HOWEVER, a trade just went down last minute.

Team 1 sends Megatron and Keller
Team 2 sends Andrew Luck



Players are related
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34413 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 11:56 am to
prob collusion

hopefully its not a money league

ETA- Who is team 2's QB?
This post was edited on 10/28/12 at 11:57 am
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 11:56 am to
Wow. Would have to see both squads to really decide.
This post was edited on 10/28/12 at 11:57 am
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82217 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 11:57 am to
LOL

I'm one of the biggest supporters of never vetoing trades unless collusion...but that smells like collusion.
Posted by Iona Fan Man
Member since Jan 2006
27462 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 11:58 am to
dynasty 2 QB league?
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82217 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 12:00 pm to
Well that certainly would change things. OP would be an idiot not to include that tidbit
Posted by KPCrimson
Dothan, AL
Member since Jun 2008
2103 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

dynasty 2 QB league
No and no. 1 QB only and no dynasty. Team 1 had Stafford already. Team 2 was last in the league but is Bro in law of team 1. Team 1 had Wayne, Marshall, Gates and Hernandez. Then Team 2 also dropped Sydney Rice (Obviously not Megatron) which Team 1 then picked up.

I may be done with this league.
This post was edited on 10/28/12 at 12:02 pm
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34413 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 12:02 pm to
collusion
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 12:04 pm to
Why would you play in a league with no vetos?
Posted by KPCrimson
Dothan, AL
Member since Jun 2008
2103 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Why would you play in a league with no vetos?
I was asked to join by a friend last year which was my first. Didn't know how things worked and then just stayed this year.

It's really a just for fun league, but still, it's not fun when people don't go about it the right way. Anyways, carry on.
This post was edited on 10/28/12 at 12:07 pm
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62285 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 1:20 pm to
Punch those motherfrickers in the throat and kick them out of the league. That is obvious collusion and should not be tolerated.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82217 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Why would you play in a league with no vetos?

NO LEAGUE should have a voting veto system. It should only be the commissioner. No trade, no matter how lopsided, should be vetoed unless there is collusion


This case sounds like collusion
This post was edited on 10/28/12 at 1:40 pm
Posted by drewnbrla
The Pool is closed.
Member since Mar 2011
7839 posts
Posted on 10/28/12 at 2:10 pm to
Pure collusion. The league should have a vote to either overturn the trade or vote to allow the option to vote on trades due to the blatant trade rape of the highest level that I have ever heard of.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram