- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Trade offer: Hurts for Lawrence and Pierce
Posted on 9/21/23 at 8:41 am
Posted on 9/21/23 at 8:41 am
I would receive Pierce and Lawrence. 10 team standard:
My team:
Hurts
RBs: Stevenson, Gus Edwards, Akers, Justice Hill (I had Chubb)
WRs: Adams, Olave, Puka, Jeudy, Cooks, Tank Dell
TE: Pitts, Kincaid
His team:
Lawrence, Dak
RBs: Jacobs, Walker, Sanders, Moss, Pierce, Bigsby
WRs: Lamb, Waddle, Watson, Reed
TE: Kittle, LaPorta
I don’t like Pierce. What’s a reasonable counter?
My team:
Hurts
RBs: Stevenson, Gus Edwards, Akers, Justice Hill (I had Chubb)
WRs: Adams, Olave, Puka, Jeudy, Cooks, Tank Dell
TE: Pitts, Kincaid
His team:
Lawrence, Dak
RBs: Jacobs, Walker, Sanders, Moss, Pierce, Bigsby
WRs: Lamb, Waddle, Watson, Reed
TE: Kittle, LaPorta
I don’t like Pierce. What’s a reasonable counter?
Posted on 9/21/23 at 8:48 am to Yesca11
What have you seen from Pierce that would make you downgrade from Hurts to Lawrence? Hell no.
ETA: missed your last statement.
If you're looking for a RB, I would only do it for Jacobs or maybe Walker but I doubt he would do that.
Lawrence/Walker would probably be the most fair trade. Still not sure I would do it.
ETA: missed your last statement.
If you're looking for a RB, I would only do it for Jacobs or maybe Walker but I doubt he would do that.
Lawrence/Walker would probably be the most fair trade. Still not sure I would do it.
This post was edited on 9/21/23 at 8:51 am
Posted on 9/21/23 at 8:56 am to Yesca11
In a ten team league, you want to the be the 1 side of a 1 for two trade.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 9:35 am to BhamTigah
If you can get Lawrence/Walker then maybe do it. But definitely not for Pierce.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 11:03 am to Yesca11
You are not getting enough. I would try to get Jacobs or Walker
Posted on 9/21/23 at 4:11 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
Lawrence/Walker would probably be the most fair trade. Still not sure I would do it.
Yeah, this seems like the most fair deal overall, but not sure if I'd do it either.
I'd try and counter with Jacobs and Lawrence since Jacobs has started slow, but that's lopsided in your favor.
Popular
Back to top

3







