- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDBBL week 19
Posted on 3/2/11 at 10:35 am to GynoSandberg
Posted on 3/2/11 at 10:35 am to GynoSandberg
bottom feeder???
Posted on 3/2/11 at 10:43 am to rondo
quote:
I realize all will have a shot to win it...but only 3 teams should be able to win IMO.
I think just let the lottery decide the whole draft?
Posted on 3/2/11 at 10:45 am to rondo
Doesn't mean you'll finish last
Posted on 3/2/11 at 10:45 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Weighted - Teams get lottery balls in inverse correlation to their place of finish.
i think this option would satisfy both sides of the argument
Posted on 3/2/11 at 10:54 am to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
I think just let the lottery decide the whole draft?
Of course you do...and I disagree with you.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:00 am to rondo
well let's just get the lottery issue decided first. and then we'll decide if we limit the number of lottery slots.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:00 am to LSU Fan 90812
Nope...I vote against unless its predetermined.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:01 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
What if teams start "throwing" games in order to finish lower?
Not setting lineups, dropping and adding, etc
People are doing this now...McCain actually adds and drops players but doesn't set his lineup.
At least this way, they aren't guaranteed a draft slot. That's the point of changing it.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:03 am to rondo
quote:
Nope...I vote against unless its predetermined
ok
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:04 am to PortCityTiger24
nobes is such a drama queen.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:06 am to rondo
quote:
The change that is being proposed is to switch to a draft lottery involving all 12 teams. The teams with the worst records would have the best chances of aquiring the highest picks, however they would not be guaranteed a particular pick.
What is not clear about this?
12 teams are included, the worst record has the most ping pong balls, the 2nd worse has the 2nd most.
You are throwing a wrench into things with the 3 bottom teams being locked into the top 3 picks.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:09 am to PortCityTiger24
Thats how the NBA does the lottery.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:12 am to rondo
The NBA does not do a snake draft. We are just trying to determine a better way to draft than how we are currently doing it. I think that a weighted draft with all 12 teams is a good way of doing it.
Rock the vote!!

Rock the vote!!
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:14 am to PortCityTiger24
ok...I vote no.
I accept the results either way though
I accept the results either way though
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:15 am to rondo
Team Lesi always the contrarians
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:17 am to rondo
Are you voting no because you don't think it's better than the current way we draft, or because we aren't doing it your way? Just curious.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:21 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
because we aren't doing it your way?
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:26 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
because we aren't doing it your way?
this
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:30 am to PortCityTiger24
I think it could be better....my one single vote wont kill your shitty draft idea.
Since when is voting against a rule so frowned upon?
Sorry I am not a sheep.
Since when is voting against a rule so frowned upon?
Sorry I am not a sheep.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 11:33 am to rondo
I think you are taking it a little too personal, for whatever reason. I was just curious as to why you voted against it. I apologize.
Popular
Back to top



1



