- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/28/11 at 12:59 pm to rondo
rick is good peeps. a good dad, brother, and lawyer 
Posted on 2/28/11 at 4:56 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
People want to sell out early because they think that's when they will get the most. Not the case IMO. Look at the keepers of the people who sold out
which is AGAIN. why it's total bullshite to then RE-REWARD people for selling out earlier by giving them first crack at draft picks order.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 2/28/11 at 4:57 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
which is AGAIN. why it's total bullshite to then RE-REWARD people for selling out earlier by giving them first crack at draft picks.
Agreed. The team that wins the league should pick first. Makes perfect sense!
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:00 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Agreed. The team that wins the league should pick first. Makes perfect sense!
i was just gonna vote for randomizing it. but hey.
in a way it does make sense.
Reward people for competing. All of the teams in the playoffs are gonna lose 2/3s off their team anyway (many of whom are keeper level players) , while non-competitive teams have been able to stockpile picks and consolidate their teams into the best keepers possible.
i think it sucks that you reward people for giving up early. They get rewarded by being able to start building for the future in advance, and then get rewarded again with first crack at rookies/non-kept players off of the contending teams in the re-draft.
i still don't see how people don't agree with me on this.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:00 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I'll the side over competing in the playoffs over having a pretty draft day all day.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:01 pm to rondo
quote:
I'll the side over competing in the playoffs over having a pretty draft day all day.
the two should not be mutually exclusive.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:02 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
Reward people for competing.
This is a keeper league. I made the move so that I could compete in the future. You think people sell out because they just want to have a shitty team?
FWIW I am all for a lottery, not a complete random selection like you are proposing.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:03 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
i think it sucks that you reward people for giving up early. They get rewarded by being able to start building for the future in advance, and then get rewarded again with first crack at rookies/non-kept players off of the contending teams in the re-draft.
If you want to do it that way, then why not set a limit on how long you can keep someone? How would you feel about that?
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:04 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
This is a keeper league. I made the move so that I could compete in the future. You think people sell out because they just want to have a shitty team?
i think that the advantage given to you in being able to start building for next year should negate ANOTHER advantage being given to you in giving you first pick in the re-draft.
you want to ruin this year for the sake of next? Fine.
But you can do it through keeper consolidation, and compiling of extra picks.
Not then be rewarded twice for this year's futility with prime draft position as well.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:04 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
i still don't see how people don't agree with me on this.
that sounds about right
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:05 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
Not then be rewarded twice for this year's futility with prime draft position as well
lottery
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:05 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
If you want to do it that way, then why not set a limit on how long you can keep someone? How would you feel about that?
a keeper time limit has is completely irrelevant to whether or not you're doubly rewarding someone for being inept.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:06 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
a keeper time limit has is completely irrelevant to whether or not you're doubly rewarding someone for being inept.
yeah, didn't think so
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:06 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
lottery
i'd be in favor of this. and that lottery should include all 12 teams.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:06 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
yeah, didn't think so
if you want to debate that independent of what I'm saying, go ahead.
But it doesn't have a single relevancy to my argument.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:07 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
i'd be in favor of this. and that lottery should include all 12 teams.
It should, I agree. The team with the worst record still has the best chance of landing the top pick, but at least they aren't guaranteed it.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:07 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I can't wait to pick in the top 3 next year. It's gonna be so fricking awesome.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:08 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
It should, I agree. The team with the worst record still has the best chance of landing the top pick, but at least they aren't guaranteed it.
is there a website that would be able to do that? I think it would be pretty neat option to explore.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 5:08 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I think you have some good points. Like I said, I am fine with doing a lottery, but it's something that we will need to vote on in the off-season.
Page 4 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News