- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDBBL Playoffs - Round 1
Posted on 3/29/12 at 3:58 pm to PortCityTiger24
Posted on 3/29/12 at 3:58 pm to PortCityTiger24
I would actually say that if you do a cap, then limiting the roster moves is unnecessary. If a team wants to make extraneous roster moves and waste a game played with a waiver wire quality player, then that's up to them.
And I think if you do both then it leads to the possibility of a double whammy. What I'd a playoff team has more than two injured players happen in a week? I think they should be allowed to pick up and drop off up to 7. bc ultimately it will be the best I.e. 42 games they can muster vs the best 42 of the other team. And I like the activity on the wire. Teams wont be able to stream bc of the cap
And I think if you do both then it leads to the possibility of a double whammy. What I'd a playoff team has more than two injured players happen in a week? I think they should be allowed to pick up and drop off up to 7. bc ultimately it will be the best I.e. 42 games they can muster vs the best 42 of the other team. And I like the activity on the wire. Teams wont be able to stream bc of the cap
1
Posted on 3/29/12 at 6:36 pm to LSU Fan 90812
45 game cap solves all streaming/games issues
5 player acquisitions (to stop streaming and all that shite that happened year 1) per week
5 player acquisitions (to stop streaming and all that shite that happened year 1) per week
Posted on 3/29/12 at 6:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
I like the idea of losers bracket determining pick order of 1-6. Will prevent the complete sell out of every single trade piece possible, and force teams to remain competitive all year.
Fixes the issue of unbalanced schedules and the benefit of facing teams after they have sold out
Fixes the issue of unbalanced schedules and the benefit of facing teams after they have sold out
This post was edited on 3/29/12 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:02 pm to Toula
I too like that. Or a weighted lottery
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:09 pm to LSU Fan 90812
A weighted lottery encourages you to lose as many games as possible.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:17 pm to Toula
i mean i get what you're saying, but if we have a situation like this year where me and knot still have relatively strong teams....it will make a mediocre team have the inside shot to the top pick
since i plan on stacking my team up to where i never sell out again, it won't affect me, but i'm just saying
since i plan on stacking my team up to where i never sell out again, it won't affect me, but i'm just saying
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it will make a mediocre team have the inside shot to the top pick
That's the point. Having guaranteed wins at the end of the season is not a good thing.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:26 pm to PortCityTiger24
well how do we deal with pick trades then?
i own knot's 1st. if he wins, do i get to pick the place for his 1st?
this creates all sorts of smart investment moves
i own knot's 1st. if he wins, do i get to pick the place for his 1st?
this creates all sorts of smart investment moves
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
He would still get to pick his draft position, as it effects all of the rounds and not just the first. Most of the teams not in the playoffs will have their own 1st pick I would imagine.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:02 pm to Toula
quote:
I like the idea of losers bracket determining pick order of 1-6. Will prevent the complete sell out of every single trade piece possible, and force teams to remain competitive all year.
what about for those of us who dont really care if we draft 1 or 6 in a keeper league. I really dont think it will deter anything IMO
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:37 pm to Toula
No the team with the next best record out of the playoffs gets the most chances. That's a good consolation for missing the playoffs
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:44 pm to LSU Fan 90812
For the record, I'd be 8-0'ing Karma, Toula, and Rick this week, and I can't even make add/drops.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:47 pm to reddman
you seem to succeed in losers brackets 
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:51 pm to Toula
Apparently.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:52 pm to Toula
quote:
Marle is going to argue that Caron Butler is a potential keeper
naw. but i havent had any fun following my team all year. some of my guys are finally healthy
Posted on 3/30/12 at 7:42 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
He would still get to pick his draft position, as it effects all of the rounds and not just the first.
see that kind of fricks up the value of the pick
Posted on 3/30/12 at 6:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Damn, didn't realize karma made that big of a comeback
We got a ballgame, folks
We got a ballgame, folks
Posted on 3/30/12 at 6:41 pm to GynoSandberg
Yeah, the injury bug is hitting me now. Doubt I win this week fellas.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 6:43 pm to PortCityTiger24
You're too close dude
Drop whoever is hurt, frick next year
Lin and Jack? you're not keeping those dudes. Lin has Darren Collison type stats now
Drop whoever is hurt, frick next year
Lin and Jack? you're not keeping those dudes. Lin has Darren Collison type stats now
This post was edited on 3/30/12 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 3/30/12 at 6:46 pm to GynoSandberg
I don't need to right now. If they are out tomorrow you know I will. I have 2 adds left.
Deandre is the next to go.
Deandre is the next to go.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News