Started By
Message

re: TD Fantasy: The Auction League | ***OPENINGS AVAILABLE FOR 2015 SEASON**

Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by Libertariantiger
Member since Nov 2012
981 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:44 pm to
I'm down with a 6-7 vote veto and 24 hr. I don't know any of you arse clowns. Seems reasonable.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:49 pm to
24 hours and 6 vetoes is fair.
Posted by Libertariantiger
Member since Nov 2012
981 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:50 pm to
Done and done.
Secretary MWG take care of that.
Posted by AirborneJonny
Fort Bragg
Member since Aug 2014
322 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:54 pm to
No ones going to veto anyway unless they are butt hurt.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162937 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:54 pm to
I'd say no one knowing each other leads to less collusion risk
Posted by Libertariantiger
Member since Nov 2012
981 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:15 pm to
I sent u a trade. Where do u value Brees? How high in say a round snake or overall rank?
In a PPR
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 5:16 pm
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
47981 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

everyone seems fairly active here and if all trades we get notifications through email for I don't see more than 24 hrs needed. Again with trades, unless its obvious collusion just don't need to be discussed, let people manage their teams.
I pretty much agree with this. 24 hours should be enough time. Any obvious collusion should be vetoed by the commish anyway.
Posted by ATLsuTiger
Johns Creek
Member since Aug 2009
5754 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

24 hours and 6 vetoes is fair.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162937 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:50 pm to
What does baseball licker think is the question we need to be asking here
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:00 pm to
We can make trades all year?
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27835 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:12 pm to
I don't know, but y'all be sure to let me know if y'all don't agree with something that I do.

Also, if people could check the defensive scoring settings and let me know if they are OK with ESPN's STANDARD SCORING, or if they would like to eliminate points associated with yards allowed.

Y'all just let me know.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:14 pm to
Well, since I drafted the Seahawks Def, I want to leave the current Standard scoring.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
47981 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:16 pm to
I have the Rams D, so 10 points per sack sounds legit to me.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27835 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:17 pm to
Yeh I prefer the standard scoring -- which everything is except PPR and decimal scoring.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162937 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:31 pm to
I've always put a huge bonus up for shutouts just because they never happen anyway
Posted by baseballkicker
Member since Dec 2011
102 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:39 pm to
I am against changing any scoring setting at this point. The draft was held and selections made according to what the values were. Changing the settings now should make the draft null and void. By the way, I reviewed the rules and scoring before hand and asked a question before the draft for clarification. Had I not asked, u would have been a fool to draft a RB since you got ZERO points for rushing yards. The point I am making is that everyone had a chance to review the league settings before the draft. That is why I questioned what changes were made earlier today, after the draft.
Posted by Libertariantiger
Member since Nov 2012
981 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:46 pm to
I agree with nutlicker, it's too late to change scoring. Waivers and trades that are not competitive issues and were questioned before the draft is different than scoring. Stop screwing with stuff that doesn't need to be messed with.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162937 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:48 pm to
What changes that are being discussed resulted in you drafting a certain player? None of what's being discussed would affect how you drafted lastnight. I could see your gripe if we suddenly wanted to make passing TDs 6 or add return yardage, but sounds like you're just bitching to bitch. If people are fine with tweaking small things I'm fine

The shutout thing was more of a joke
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 6:50 pm
Posted by baseballkicker
Member since Dec 2011
102 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:52 pm to
Also, if people could check the defensive scoring settings and let me know if they are OK with ESPN's STANDARD SCORING, or if they would like to eliminate points associated with yards allowed.

Y'all just let me know.


THIS YOU DUMB FCK. READ BEFORE YOU RESPOND. I AM NOT BITCHING TO BITCH. JUST KEEPING YA'LL HONEST....
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 6:54 pm
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162937 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:54 pm to

this dude is going to be fun
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 57Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram