Started By
Message

Should this trade be vetoed?

Posted on 10/12/22 at 10:15 pm
Posted by Tiger_Eye
Member since Feb 2021
30 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 10:15 pm
Mostert and Joe burrow for Josh Allen?

Person getting mostert has Kamara, Chase Edmonds, Tony pollard, eno Benjamin as his runningbacks and is 1-4.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 10:18 pm
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7904 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 10:23 pm to
Nope

ETA: that’s a great trade. For both.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 10:25 pm
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37136 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 10:28 pm to
frick no. Why on Earth would you think this should be vetoed?
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8428 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 10:37 pm to
Someone has shitty RB depth so they’re downgrading from allen to burrow to pick up an RB2

I’m not sure I think it’s a good deal…but not even close to vetoable
Posted by wrlakers
Member since Sep 2007
5748 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Should this trade be vetoed?


No. You don't veto a trade just because you don't like it.
Posted by Tiger_Eye
Member since Feb 2021
30 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 12:04 am to
I actually was the person getting Allen. Had a lot of backlash though. Just curious on opinions of fairness
Posted by obdobd918
Member since Jun 2020
3228 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 12:25 am to
Allen is #1 QB in FF. Burrow is Top 5-10, so adding a RB like Mostert evens this trade. whoever is getting Allen might not be getting enough; however, Burrow plays the Saints this week and he could light it up with Lattimore injured.
Posted by Jumbo_Gumbo
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2015
5691 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:48 am to
No. Josh Allen is a 40-50 point/game guy. JB is 20-30 and Mostert is 10-20 and injury prone. Seems pretty fair to me.
Posted by WuShock
Metairie
Member since Aug 2018
1316 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:37 am to
Let people run their team the way they want to. Unless it’s an obvious value difference (Like only Mostert for Allen) and the two are close friends/family, there’s no reason to veto a trade in fantasy football.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65955 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 7:09 am to
It's fine enough. I also agree with you.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14107 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 8:29 am to
I like the Allen side, but not veto material.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38409 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 8:56 am to
If you ask the question, I know all I need to know about you.
Posted by ThatTahoeOverThere
Member since Nov 2021
3621 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 9:55 am to
Yes
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7904 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 10:01 am to
When you’re 1-4 to start the season, you’ve gotta make moves.

You can hold on to a top scorer and potentially keep losing.. or you can take some risk.

Betting that Burrow improves and securing a RB2 by holding both of the MIA backs is a move. Not without risk, but it’s clear what he has isn’t working.

Mostert > Edmonds so far. Now he’ll have both.
Posted by Tiger_Eye
Member since Feb 2021
30 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 10:23 am to
Again, I said I’m the one who got Allen. Everybody in league was upset but I think it’s because of how good it made my team.
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7904 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 10:39 am to
Let them cry. Burrow isn’t a slouch. And Allen probably won’t keep averaging nearly 30 points per game.

Again, I like it for both sides.
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7904 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

And Allen probably won’t keep averaging nearly 30 points per game


So before I get myself into a pissing match… there’s data behind that statement. Not saying Burrow outperforms Allen, but the gap could surely close.

Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28724 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 11:21 am to
The trade is flat out terrible if thats what you are asking.

Trade rapes happen. Dont believe its veto worthy though. The other owner should have shopped around
This post was edited on 10/13/22 at 11:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram